Cited by 363Lower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionMuscle activation and electromyography studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanics and Energetics of Human Locomotion on Sand

Lejeune, T. M., Willems, P. A., Heglund, N. C.·1998·Journal of Experimental Biology

Abstract

Moving about in nature often involves walking or running on a soft yielding substratum such as sand, which has a profound effect on the mechanics and energetics of locomotion. Force platform and cinematographic analyses were used to determine the mechanical work performed by human subjects during walking and running on sand and on a hard surface. Oxygen consumption was used to determine the energetic cost of walking and running under the same conditions. Walking on sand requires 1.6–2.5 times more mechanical work than does walking on a hard surface at the same speed. In contrast, running on sand requires only 1.15 times more mechanical work than does running on a hard surface at the same speed. Walking on sand requires 2.1–2.7 times more energy expenditure than does walking on a hard surface at the same speed; while running on sand requires 1.6 times more energy expenditure than does running on a hard surface. The increase in energy cost is due primarily to two effects: the mechanical work done on the sand, and a decrease in the efficiency of positive work done by the muscles and tendons.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jeb.201.13.2071

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Margaria, 1938, Sulla fisiologia e especialmente sul consumo energetico della marcia e della corsa a varia velocitá ed inclinazione del terreno, Atti. dei Lincei, 7, 299

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lejeune, T. M., Willems, P. A., & Heglund, N. C.
Affiliations
Université catholique de Louvain , Place P. de Coubertin , 1 B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
Venue
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
1998-07-01
Volume
201
Issue
13
Pages
2071-2080
ISSN
  • 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9145
OpenAlex
W2146393466
Cited by
363
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 17
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
human locomotion, mechanical work, energy expenditure, oxygen consumption, muscle efficiency, gait energetics
MeSH terms
Biomechanical Phenomena, Energy Metabolism, Humans, Oxygen Consumption, Running, Soil, Tendons, Walking, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review