The DOI matches its Crossref record; 406 of the 406 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 95 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
State of science: mental workload in ergonomics
Open accessAbstract
Mental workload (MWL) is one of the most widely used concepts in ergonomics and human factors and represents a topic of increasing importance. Since modern technology in many working environments imposes ever more cognitive demands upon operators while physical demands diminish, understanding how MWL impinges on performance is increasingly critical. Yet, MWL is also one of the most nebulous concepts, with numerous definitions and dimensions associated with it. Moreover, MWL research has had a tendency to focus on complex, often safety-critical systems (e.g. transport, process control). Here we provide a general overview of the current state of affairs regarding the understanding, measurement and application of MWL in the design of complex systems over the last three decades. We conclude by discussing contemporary challenges for applied research, such as the interaction between cognitive workload and physical workload, and the quantification of workload 'redlines' which specify when operators are approaching or exceeding their performance tolerances.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This state-of-science review traces mental workload (MWL) research in ergonomics from definition and measurement to application, arguing that MWL remains a multidimensional and still-nebulous construct. It highlights transport as the dominant applied domain and identifies neuroergonomics and the quantification of workload “redlines” as key future challenges.
Key findings
- Ergo-Abs searches show MWL references rising from 58 hits in the 1980s to 140 in the 1990s and 191 in the 2000s; the 2000s decade-on-decade increase was 36% for “mental workload” versus 17% for “physical workload” and “workload.”
- Applied MWL publications increased as a proportion of the field: 26% in the 1980s, 39% in the 1990s, and 46% in the 2000s; transport dominated, especially driving (40 total papers, including 28 in the 2000s), aviation (19), ATC (17), and rail (12).
- Both overload and underload can degrade performance, with an optimum range of MWL; measurement typically uses primary/secondary task performance, subjective reports (e.g. NASA-TLX, SWAT, RSME), and physiological metrics (e.g. heart rate, heart rate variability, EEG, facial muscle activity, NIRS).
- The paper reports approximate redlines such as working memory at roughly seven chunks, relational complexity at roughly three interacting relations, tracking bandwidth at roughly one cycle per second, and timeline analysis TR/TA, with Parks and Boucek suggesting errors begin around the 80% level rather than 100%.
Methods
- Narrative state-of-science review, not an empirical study; no primary data collection or participants are reported.
- Uses decade-by-decade searches of the Ergo-Abs database for “mental workload,” “physical workload,” and “workload,” plus a title-field search of “mental workload” categorized into broad application areas.
- Synthesizes conceptual, measurement, and application literature across the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s, with discussion of current and future challenges.
Limitations
- Stated: the applied review “is not intended to be an exhaustive review”; application categorization was selective and based on the most obvious theme from title and abstract; database coverage grew over time, partly inflating later counts.
- Stated: MWL remains “just as nebulous a concept today as it did three decades ago”; research has failed to provide absolute limits on human performance, and underload lacks a widely accepted theory, making its redline especially elusive.
- Evident from the text: the review is narrative and selective rather than systematic, and the authors note that dissociation among workload measures complicates interpretation and that absolute workload prediction remains difficult.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
71 Not checked yet · 57 No basis given · 28 Own interpretation · 11 Own result
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A search of Ergo-Abs (the Ergonomics Abstracts online database, which covers international books, journals and conference proceedings across a variety of ergonomics-related fields) over the last three decades (which reflects the vast majority of sources indexed in the database) shows that references to 'mental workload' have increased more than threefold since the 1980s (see Table 1).”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The Ergo-Abs database search results are representative of the broader MWL literature.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In terms of thematic trends within the MWL applications themselves, it is interesting to note the peak in software engineering and/or computer-aided design (CAD) in the 1980s, but the clear dominance of transport-related applications (e.g. air traffic control, aviation, driving and rail) from the 1990s onwards.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The categorisation of publications into application areas based on title and abstract is valid for identifying thematic trends.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In terms of thematic trends within the MWL applications themselves, it is interesting to note the peak in software engineering and/or computer-aided design (CAD) in the 1980s, but the clear dominance of transport-related applications (e.g. air traffic control, aviation, driving and rail) from the 1990s onwards.”
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The categorisation of publications into application areas based on title and abstract is valid for identifying thematic trends.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of these, driving stands out as a particular focus area especially in the last decade, although we should also note the rapid growth of MWL research in the rail industry, reflecting the resurgence in ergonomics and human factors interest within this domain (e.g. Wilson and Norris 2005).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The categorisation of publications into application areas based on title and abstract is valid for identifying thematic trends.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When taken in conjunction with the pattern of results observed in Table 1, this represents some 46% of the total publications in the field for that decade.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A review of trends in applied MWL research over time supports this assumption, showing a much higher proportion of publications relating to applications in recent years.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The categorisation of publications into application areas based on title and abstract is valid for identifying thematic trends.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The result of this search shows that the first decade of the twenty-first century saw a total of 87 publications concerning specific applications of MWL.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The categorisation of publications into application areas based on title and abstract is valid for identifying thematic trends.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Compared to the 1990s (39%) and the 1980s (26%), this would seem to suggest a relative increase in focus on applications from the earlier publications on MWL to the present.”
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Indeed, the contribution of physical demands to MWL is often neglected in applied research, despite the oft-quoted analogy between mental and physical load, as well as numerous other implicit and explicit acknowledgements of its influence.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A key part of this problem is that a widely accepted theory of underload does not yet exist - and if we cannot describe a concept, we will certainly struggle to quantify it.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 68
- It may state two separate claims as one. 48
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Research in the 1990s was also concerned with the proliferation of automation, and a significant body of work was directed at the emergence of more advanced physiological metrics of workload.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, the relative decade-on-decade increase in hits for MWL in the 2000s suggests a more recent prominence over the comparator terms - 36% for 'mental workload' against 17% for 'physical workload' and 'workload'.”
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The relative increase in MWL hits over comparator terms indicates a genuine increase in prominence rather than only database coverage.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A cursory review of these search results indicates that the focus in the 1980s was much more on the measurement of MWL, while the 1990s saw a shift towards theoretical developments and modelling efforts.”
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A cursory review of these search results indicates that the focus in the 1980s was much more on the measurement of MWL, while the 1990s saw a shift towards theoretical developments and modelling efforts.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, the first decade of the twenty-first century has seen more examples of MWL applications coming to the fore.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Of these, driving stands out as a particular focus area especially in the last decade, although we should also note the rapid growth of MWL research in the rail industry, reflecting the resurgence in ergonomics and human factors interest within this domain (e.g. Wilson and Norris 2005).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wilson and Norris 2005
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: The categorisation of publications into application areas based on title and abstract is valid for identifying thematic trends.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Another theme emerging from this review surrounds the impacts of skill (or experience) and age on MWL, which can, more generally, be related to the still unsolved puzzle of individual differences (see Damos 1988; Szalma 2009).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Damos 1988
- Not checked yetcites Szalma 2009
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The predominance of transport applications among MWL research over the last two decades cannot be ignored.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The other key theme in the 1980s was on adaptive interfaces.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The theoretical underload redline does exist and is illustrated on Figure 2, but identifying or quantifying it remains elusive.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We would certainly not wish to claim that progress in measurement or definition has ended; MWL looks to be just as nebulous a concept today as it did three decades ago, and researchers continue to debate over definitions to this day.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But we know this is not the case; underload is just as bad for performance as overload, and leads to the classic inverted-U curve as illustrated in the figures.”
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The field has developed from tackling the thorny issue of defining the concept, through the development of metrics of MWL, to the more recent focus on applied research, which, in turn, reflects the technological and societal concerns of our times.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is particularly the case as technology progresses in areas such as transportation, which has already dominated the MWL scene in recent years.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While this notion offers a neat hypothetical explanation of underload and overload, it still does not let us quantify or predict these redlines in an applied setting.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Indeed, in measurement, new neuroergonomics techniques are emerging as strong contenders for finally ascertaining the physiological correlates of mental demand.”
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Research in this field has so far failed to provide absolute limits on human performance due to the complex nature of the subject and of the processes involved.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Earlier in the paper, we reviewed research from the 1980s promising workload-based adaptive automation. Some 25 years later, that promise is yet to be fulfilled.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Mental workload (MWL) is one of the most widely invoked concepts in ergonomics research and practice (Flemisch and Onken 2002; Loft et al. 2007; Parasuraman and Hancock 2001; Tsang and Vidulich 2006; Wickens 2008).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Flemisch and Onken 2002
- Not checked yetcites Loft et al. 2007
- Not checked yetcites Parasuraman and Hancock 2001
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“It is easier to state what underload is not: it is not vigilance (since the consensus has been for some time that vigilant monitoring is actually a highly demanding task; Warm, Dember, and Hancock 1996) nor is it boredom (usually it is about doing very little rather than doing nothing at all).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Warm, Dember, and Hancock 1996
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Indeed, the current opinion is that there is an optimum range of MWL which is associated with best performance (Hancock and Warm 1989; see also Figure 1).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hancock and Warm 1989
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Automatic processing is associated with expert performance and is characteristically fast, unconscious and almost completely liberated from attentional resource constraints.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schneider and Shiffrin 1977
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If demands begin to exceed capacity, skilled operators can either adjust their strategy to compensate or else performance necessarily degrades.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, it is probably fair to say that the jury is out as to whether underload is distinct from other influences on performance such as automation-related complacency and supervisory control.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There may also be different kinds of resources available, as in other team members, or technological support to cope with demand.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, there is no direct guarantee that simply reducing MWL improves performance, and in fact the opposite may be true.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fixed resource models of workload are not without their drawbacks, though. For instance, absolute capacity demands are illusive; they do not directly consider nonattentional factors, such as experience, or more slowly changing variation in attentional resources due to learning or the reduction of capacity with age, or even the willingness to invest effort.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although numerous definitions have been offered, it is obvious that there is no universal agreement between these disparate statements.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is easier to state what underload is not: it is not vigilance (since the consensus has been for some time that vigilant monitoring is actually a highly demanding task; Warm, Dember, and Hancock 1996) nor is it boredom (usually it is about doing very little rather than doing nothing at all).”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Demands (stress) can have multiple facets, such as time pressure and task complexity.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The converse is controlled processing, and in the practical world these two elements lie on a continuum.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Suboptimal workload can mean either overload or underload (Brookhuis and de Waard 2000).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Brookhuis and de Waard 2000
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“MWLhasthus become a topic of increasing importance as modern technology imposes ever greater cognitive demands.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Consequently, if effort is invested, then MWL will be increased (cf. Shaw et al. 2013) - which may be a positive adaptation in circumstances of underload, but could be further detrimental when faced with overload.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is consistent with the attentional resources approach, as automatic processing releases attentional resources for other tasks, with a resulting decrease in MWL.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, MWL as a multidimensional construct, is determined by characteristics of the task (e.g. demands, performance), of the operator (e.g. skill, attention) and, to a degree, the environmental context in which the performance occurs.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the present authors' view, there has to be some engagement in the task, but such engagement is exceptionally low.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Underload itself, while an intuitive concept, is in many ways a more nebulous term than MWL, as different researchers take it to mean different things.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From this view, MWL in real-world tasks is determined by the balance of automatic and controlled processing involved.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“That said, there is a strong consensus that mental underload can be just as detrimental to performance as mental overload, with both leading to performance degradation, attentional lapses and errors (Wilson and Rajan 1995).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wilson and Rajan 1995
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are, however, commonalities among the various interpretations, which do help to shed light here.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although the stress/strain comparison has been criticised for being too simplistic (e.g. Bainbridge 1974), even the international standard on MWL (ISO 10075, 2000) is heavily dependent on the analogy for its terminology.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites ISO 10075, 2000
- Not checked yetcites Bainbridge 1974
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“MWL is a peculiar concept that has intuitive appeal, but remains surprisingly difficult to define (see also situation awareness; Smith and Hancock 1995).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Smith and Hancock 1995
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Finally, the trade-off between stress and strain may have different effects on the human - as measured by the different objective and subjective metrics which we describe later (see, e.g., Bevan and Macleod 1994).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bevan and Macleod 1994
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Resources, in this arena of discussion, often refer to attentional resources (e.g. Wickens 1980, 2002); thus, MWL becomes a product of the resources available to meet task demands (Welford 1978).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Welford 1978
- Not checked yetcites Wickens 1980, 2002
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“An analogy is often made between mental and physical load, in that each expresses two components - stress (i.e. task demands) and strain (impact on the human; cf. Schlegel 1993).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schlegel 1993
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, performance can be maintained at the cost of individual strain or vice versa.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overload occurs, for instance, when the operator is faced with more stimuli than (s)he is able to handle while maintaining their own standards of performance.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As workload increases, the response time to, and the chance of missing, a signal increases.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Visual perception is crucial for drivers while concurrent execution of another in-vehicle visual task (for instance, looking at a cell phone) competes for visual attention with the primary driving task.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“MWL can increase heart rate and decrease heart rate variability at the same time.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Physiological measures are a natural type of workload index since work demands physiological activity by definition.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“So far, these methods have been restricted to laboratory conditions, and the equipment is extremely expensive to purchase and use.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Recently, Posner (2012) illustrated that new methods to study human operators at work are gaining momentum, advancing our understanding of brain plasticity.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Posner 2012
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Other measures of interest are the activity of the brain (Brookhuis and de Waard 1993; de Waard and Brookhuis 1991) and of certain facial muscles, such as the corrugator supercilii (Hoogendoorn et al. 2010; Jessurun, Steyvers, and Brookhuis 1993).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Brookhuis and de Waard 1993
- Not checked yetcites de Waard and Brookhuis 1991
- Not checked yetcites Hoogendoorn et al. 2010
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Closely coupled to heart rate and also sensitive to workload is blood pressure (Rau 2004).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rau 2004
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Suboptimal workload may also emerge from disruptions in the operator's physiology, for instance when under stress (Hancock and Warm 1989), although other non-workload stressors (such as from the environment or sleep loss) can influence these indices.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hancock and Warm 1989
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the complex, safety-critical systems where MWL research is usually most pertinent and/or most pursued (such as transport, as we shall see later), both underload and overload are very real concerns.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Operator conditions in fixed positions such as operating motor vehicles, trains and airplanes are suitable for this next generation of MWL field studies.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While numerous physiological measures are now relatively easily measured in the operational environment, attention is less easily monitored in ambulant situations - but not impossible.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“MWLis a subjective state as well; people are able to express themselves in words or indications on scales in post-task responses (Zijlstra 1993).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Zijlstra 1993
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Beta activity (1230 Hz) is predominant when the participant in the study is generally awake and alert, while the activity dropping to Alpha activity (8-12 Hz) indicates developing drowsiness, and going further down into the theta region (5-8 Hz) may even lead to falling asleep.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As we have noted, the multidimensional nature of MWL is reflected in the variety of workload metrics available (see also, e.g. Gawron 2008).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gawron 2008
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But while both low and high MWL are undoubtedly basic precursors to errors, an exact relationship between MWL and accident causation is not easily established, let alone measured in practice.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Modern integrated, wireless measurement facilities enable more easily accessible EEG measurement (e.g. Makeig et al. 2002), while more integrated approaches such as neuroergonomics, suggested by Parasuraman (2011), open new windows to the study of MWL.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Parasuraman 2011
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The PDT is based on the premise that visual attention narrows as workload increases.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Driving on an urban road with traffic, traffic signs and traffic lights leads to increased workload according to these measures (high heart rate, low variability), which immediately reverses when the driver stops if one of the lights turns red.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites De Waard 1996
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Modern integrated, wireless measurement facilities enable more easily accessible EEG measurement (e.g. Makeig et al. 2002), while more integrated approaches such as neuroergonomics, suggested by Parasuraman (2011), open new windows to the study of MWL.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Makeig et al. 2002
- Not checked yetcites Parasuraman 2011
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Brookhuis and de Waard (2000) discriminated between underload and overload by referring to error sources, the former leading to reduced alertness and lowered attention, the latter to distraction, diverted attention and insufficient time for adequate information processing.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Brookhuis and de Waard 2000
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In fact, recent research has explored the interaction between physical and MWL across some of these metrics, espousing the idea that light physical activity could actually compensate for the deficits imposed by mental underload (Basahel, Young, and Ajovalasit 2010).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Basahel, Young, and Ajovalasit 2010
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Both physical workload and MWL are well known to have a clear impact on heart rate, heart rate variability and respiration (Mulder 1992), and delineating the effects of one over the other can prove troublesome in applied research.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mulder 1992
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the central region, workload gradually increases while performance is at its best, remaining relatively constant.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the apparent concern is more with overload than underload, it is clear that issues of optimising workload and defining workload 'redlines' or thresholds have occupied researchers since some of the earliest work in this field.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Thus, higher task demand leading to increased MWL does not have to affect performance, and not all measures have to be strongly correlated.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites de Waard 1996
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Also, Hayashi (1988; Hayashi and Kosugo 1987) examined the MWL of software engineers in programming tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hayashi 1988
- Not checked yetcites Hayashi and Kosugo 1987
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“If one measure reflects an increase in workload and another measure does not, then measures are said to dissociate (see also Hancock 1996; Yeh and Wickens 1988).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hancock 1996
- Not checked yetcites Yeh and Wickens 1988
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“All of this chimes with recent suggestions that mind and body cannot be separated in ergonomics research (cf. Marras and Hancock 2014).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Marras and Hancock 2014
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Similarly, Nowakowski (1987) was also concerned with online MWL assessment for a knowledge-based adaptive system, with a particular focus on individual differences between users.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nowakowski 1987
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For instance, glass cockpits in commercial aircraft have relieved workload in some areas, such as reduced display clutter and more automated flight procedures. However, the same systems have increased workload in other areas, such as more decision options in any given situation (Hilburn 1997), and confusion with respect to operating modes (Ferris, Wickens, and Sarter 2010; Sarter and Woods 1995).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hilburn 1997
- Not checked yetcites Ferris, Wickens, and Sarter 2010
- Not checked yetcites Sarter and Woods 1995
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The problem with some automation is that it reduces workload when demand is low but problematically increases workload when demand is high. This tendency is evident when the automation is 'dumb and dutiful' as Wiener (1989) cast it.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wiener 1989
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Dissociation has usually been reported between self-reports and measures of performance, and sometimes between physiological and self-report measures (Myrtek et al. 1994).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Myrtek et al. 1994
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notwithstanding the progress reported here, the measurement of mental work is founded on the science of psychology and comparatively speaking, psychology is an immature, if no less difficult, science.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Count variables can be used to predict absolute workload values, both above and below the redline, but multitask interference models cannot easily do so at the current stage of their maturity.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In any resource-limited system, the most relevant measure of demand is specified relative to the supply of available resources.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These metrics suggest a resolution of the physical versus MWL question, and perhaps even augur the potential to quantify workload and those redlines of performance.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It has been suggested (Perrey, Thedon, and Rupp 2010; Shaw et al. 2013) that metrics of brain oxygenation could essentially represent a quantitative measure of attentional resources.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Perrey, Thedon, and Rupp 2010
- Not checked yetcites Shaw et al. 2013
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example we have noted the redline for working memory at roughly seven chunks of information.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, alongside these evident scientific concerns, the need to assess mental work is also very much fuelled by the ever-present practical necessity to measure mental activity and allocate tasks in the modern electronic workplace.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Alternatively, low demands could be misperceived by the operator, leading to a mismatch in terms of effort invested to perform the task (Matthews and Desmond 1997).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Matthews and Desmond 1997
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many of the measures are also differentially sensitive in the different regions.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Young and Stanton's research into vehicle automation led them to propose a theory whereby attentional resources shrink in situations of low workload, thus leading to problems when demands suddenly increase (see Young and Stanton 2002).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Young and Stanton 2002
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The redlines of both underload and overload coincide with the points where the demand and resource lines cross over; performance degrades in both regions of underload and overload when demands exceed resources.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“As we have already seen earlier in this paper, effort is voluntary and is related to resource investment (cf. Shaw et al. 2013), so this could be compatible with Young and Stanton's (2002) idea.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Shaw et al. 2013
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, it is reasonable to suggest that the applied problems will assume even greater prominence as we move forward.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Advances in mobile and wearable computing, augmented reality and similar technologies no doubt present great challenges for MWL research in the near future.”
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is reflected (albeit with some artistic licence) in Figure 2, as resource supply (based on activation and/or effort) at first lags behind task demands in the underload region, then exceeds it until resources start to asymptote towards the upper capacity limit, and we reach overload.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These advances also reflect and further emphasise the role of mental work over physical work in the modern workplace.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Here, very low workload is often coupled with fatigue and automationrelated complacency. Then the sudden unexpected failure rapidly throws the operator into a highly stressful fault diagnosis and failure management mode, well above the redline, in such a way that the prior loss of situation awareness has rendered them unprepared.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The Ergo-Abs database search results are representative of the broader MWL literature.
“A search of Ergo-Abs (the Ergonomics Abstracts online database, which covers international books, journals and conference proceedings across a variety of ergonomics-related fields) over the last three decades (which reflects the vast majority of sources indexed in the database) shows that references to 'mental workload' have increased more than threefold since the 1980s (see Table 1).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The categorisation of publications into application areas based on title and abstract is valid for identifying thematic trends.
“There is an element of selectivity in this: the categorisation process being necessarily one of independent determination and based on the most obvious theme from the title and abstract of the publication and where the application was the main focus of the paper (as opposed to focusing on a workload metric albeit in a particular application).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The relative increase in MWL hits over comparator terms indicates a genuine increase in prominence rather than only database coverage.
“This increase no doubt partly reflects the growing coverage of the database in more recent years, as evidenced by equivalent searches for 'physical workload' and 'workload'. Nevertheless, the relative decade-on-decade increase in hits for MWL in the 2000s suggests a more recent prominence over the comparator terms - 36% for 'mental workload' against 17% for 'physical workload' and 'workload'.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Timeline analysis assumes that workload is proportional to the ratio of the time occupied performing tasks to total time available.
“In a simplified but readily usable version, it assumes that workload is proportional to the ratio of the time occupied performing tasks to total time available.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Assessing mental workload as a multidimensional context-dependent construct is generally done by a combination of self-report, performance, and physiological indicators rather than by any single measure alone (Young et al., 2015; Longo et al., 2022; Hart and Staveland, 1988).”
From Enhancement of modern defense capabilities by convergence of cognitive neuroscience and artificial intelligence (2026) · cites this paper as Young et al., 2015
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ 1. Context · p. 2
“Thus, the general evolution of research in MWL has progressed from trying to measure it, through trying to define it, to the real-world applications of it today.”
§ 6. Summary and conclusions · p. 12
“The field has developed from tackling the thorny issue of defining the concept, through the development of metrics of MWL, to the more recent focus on applied research, which, in turn, reflects the technological and societal concerns of our times.”
Citations
Cites
Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems
Holling, C. S. (1973) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245 · Cited by 18,995
Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research
(1988) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62386-9 · Cited by 15,003
Flow: the psychology of optimal experience
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-0597 · Cited by 12,654
Vannote, R. L., Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J. R., & Cushing, C. E. (1980) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f80-017 · Cited by 9,984
Self-organized criticality: An explanation of the 1/ f noise
Bak, P., Tang, C., & Wiesenfeld, K. A. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.381 · Cited by 7,644
The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit formation
Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908) · Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology · doi:10.1002/cne.920180503 · Cited by 6,911
Power-law distributions in empirical data
Clauset, A. J., Shalizi, C. R., & Newman, M. E. J. (2018) · Figshare · doi:10.1184/r1/6586835.v1 · Cited by 6,710
Poff, N. L., Allan, J. D., Bain, M. B., Karr, J. R., Prestegaard, K. L., Richter, B. D., Sparks, R. E., & Stromberg, J. C. (1997) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1313099 · Cited by 6,500
Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.1.1 · Cited by 5,902
Newman (2005) · doi:10.1080/00107510500052444 · Cited by 5,749
Engineering Psychology and Human Performance
Wickens, C. D., Hollands, J. G., Banbury, S. P., & Parasuraman, R. (2015) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315665177 · Cited by 5,017
Self-citationOrganisms as Ecosystem Engineers
Jones, C. G., Lawton, J. H., & Shachak, M. (1994) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4018-1_14 · Cited by 4,376
The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics.
Proctor, J., Pickett, S. T. A., & White, P. S. (1986) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2403105 · Cited by 3,948
The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior
Easterbrook, J. A. (1959) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0047707 · Cited by 3,090
The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications
Leopold, L. B., & Maddock, T. (1953) · Professional Paper · doi:10.3133/pp252 · Cited by 2,966
(2003) · Cited by 2,898
The Ecology of Interfaces: Riparian Zones
Naiman, R. J., & Décamps, H. (1997) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.621 · Cited by 2,791
Multiple resources and performance prediction
Wickens, C. D. (2002) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/14639220210123806 · Cited by 2,621 · cited 2×
“When this performance decrement results because of multitasking overload, models such as the multiple resource model (Wickens 2002, 2005, 2008) or models of crosstalk interference (Wickens et al. 2013) can offer a framework for design or task changes that will reduce the demand and resulting…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationHabitat, the Templet for Ecological Strategies?
Southwood, T. R. E. (1977) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/3817 · Cited by 2,271
Controlled and automatic human information processing: I
Schneider, W. E., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977) · Cited by 2,228
Multiple Resources and Mental Workload
Wickens, C. D. (2008) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872008x288394 · Cited by 2,164
Self-citationPlant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties
Grime, J. P. (2001) · Cited by 2,087
Magnitude and Frequency of Forces in Geomorphic Processes
Wolman, M. G., & Miller, J. P. (1960) · The Journal of Geology · doi:10.1086/626637 · Cited by 2,002
Adaptation to natural flow regimes
Lytle, D. A., & Poff, N. L. (2003) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.002 · Cited by 1,753
Robert J. Hockey, G. (1997) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0511(96)05223-4 · Cited by 1,753
Charlton, R. (2007) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203371084-12 · Cited by 1,689
Biodiversity: Population Versus Ecosystem Stability
Tilman, D. G. (1996) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/2265614 · Cited by 1,633
Dynamic Brain Sources of Visual Evoked Responses
Makeig, S., Westerfield, M., Jung, T.-P., Enghoff, S., Townsend, J., Courchesne, E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1066168 · Cited by 1,630
The Geology of Fluvial Deposits
Miall, A. D. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-03237-4 · Cited by 1,558
The origin and early evolution of plants on land
Kenrick, P., & Crane, P. R. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/37918 · Cited by 1,466
Strangman, G. E., Culver, J. P., Thompson, J. H., & Boas, D. A. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1227 · Cited by 1,421
Walling, D. E. (1983) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(83)90217-2 · Cited by 1,367
Landslide inventories and their statistical properties
Malamud, B. D., Turcotte, D. L., Guzzetti, F., & Reichenbach, P. (2004) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.1064 · Cited by 1,308
Disturbance, patchiness, and diversity in streams
Lake, P. S. (2000) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.2307/1468118 · Cited by 1,230
Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine
(2011) · Wilderness and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.wem.2010.11.006 · Cited by 1,200
Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems
Townsend, C. R., & Hildrew, A. G. (1994) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01740.x · Cited by 1,188
Knighton, D. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203784662 · Cited by 1,122
Riparia: ecology, conservation, and management of streamside communities
Naiman, R. J., Décamps, H., & McClain, M. E. (2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-5880 · Cited by 1,010
Hancock, P. A., & Meshkati, N. (1988) · Cited by 954
Self-citationThe riverine ecosystem synthesis: biocomplexity in river networks across space and time
Thorp, J., Thoms, M., & Delong, M. D. (2006) · River Research and Applications · doi:10.1002/rra.901 · Cited by 948
Zander, T. O., & Kothe, C. A. (2011) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/025005 · Cited by 947
The Patch Dynamics Concept of Stream Community Ecology
Townsend, C. R. (1989) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.2307/1467400 · Cited by 942
Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H., & Phillips, S. D. (1998) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x98001769 · Cited by 940
A Guide To Task Analysis: The Task Analysis Working Group
Kirwan, B., & Ainsworth, L. (1992) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 919
Regular pattern formation in real ecosystems
Rietkerk, M., & van de Koppel, J. (2008) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.013 · Cited by 896
A Dynamic Model of Stress and Sustained Attention
Hancock, P. A. (1989) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872088903100503 · Cited by 874
Self-citationHow in the World Did We Ever Get into That Mode? Mode Error and Awareness in Supervisory Control
Sarter, N. B., & Woods, D. D. (1995) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872095779049516 · Cited by 853
A temporal comparison of BOLD, ASL, and NIRS hemodynamic responses to motor stimuli in adult humans
Huppert, T. J., Hoge, R. D., Diamond, S. G., Franceschini, M. A., & Boas, D. A. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.065 · Cited by 846
Geomorphology and River Management: Applications of the River Styles Framework
Brierley, G., & Fryirs, K. (2005) · doi:10.1002/9780470751367ubr01 · Cited by 834
Quaternary Refugia of North European Trees
Bennett, K. D., Tzedakis, P. C., & Willis, K. J. (1991) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.2307/2845248 · Cited by 830
Tolerance of riverine plants to flooding and exposure indicated by water regime
BLANCH, S. J., Ganf, G. G., & Walker, K. F. (1999) · Regulated Rivers Research & Management · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1646(199901/06)15:1/3 · Cited by 828
The Subjective Workload Assessment Technique: A Scaling Procedure for Measuring Mental Workload
Reid, G. B., & Nygren, T. E. (1988) · Advances in psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62387-0 · Cited by 827
The science and practice of river restoration
Wohl, E., Lane, S. N., & Wilcox, A. C. (2015) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2014wr016874 · Cited by 770
Algeo, T. J., & Scheckler, S. E. (1998) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0195 · Cited by 769
Corenblit, D., Tabacchi, É., Steiger, J., & Gurnell, A. M. (2007) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2007.05.004 · Cited by 764
The structure of attentional resources.
Wickens, C. (1980) · Attention and performance · Cited by 762
Self-citationMental workload while driving: effects on visual search, discrimination, and decision making.
Recarte, M. A., & Nunes, L. (2003) · Journal of experimental psychology. Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.9.2.119 · Cited by 757
Plants as river system engineers
Gurnell, A. M. (2013) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.3397 · Cited by 751
Green algae and the origin of land plants.
Lewis, L., & McCourt, R. (2004) · American-Eurasian journal of botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.91.10.1535 · Cited by 751
Relative scales of time and effectiveness of climate in watershed geomorphology
Wolman, M. G., & Gerson, R. (1978) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.3290030207 · Cited by 738
Streamflow requirements for cottonwood seedling recruitment—An integrative model
Mahoney, J. M., & Rood, S. B. (1998) · Wetlands · doi:10.1007/bf03161678 · Cited by 728
(Dis)Connectivity in catchment sediment cascades: a fresh look at the sediment delivery problem
Fryirs, K. (2012) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.3242 · Cited by 711
Landscape Sensitivity and Change
Brunsden, D., & Thornes, J. B. (1979) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.2307/622210 · Cited by 691
THE INTERMEDIATE DISTURBANCE HYPOTHESIS: PATCH DYNAMICS AND MECHANISMS OF SPECIES COEXISTENCE
Roxburgh, S. H., Shea, K., & Wilson, J. B. (2004) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/03-0266 · Cited by 683
Kirwan, B., & Ainsworth, L. K. (1992) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b16826 · Cited by 677
The human role in changing river channels
Gregory, K. J. (2006) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.06.018 · Cited by 674
Fluvial landscape ecology: addressing uniqueness within the river discontinuum
Poole, G. (2002) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00922.x · Cited by 673
PROCESS DOMAINS AND THE RIVER CONTINUUM 1
Montgomery, D. R. (1999) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb03598.x · Cited by 661
Deciphering the effect of climate change on landslide activity: A review
Crozier, M. J. (2010) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.04.009 · Cited by 651
Optical brain monitoring for operator training and mental workload assessment
Ayaz, H., Shewokis, P. A., Bunce, S., Izzetoglu, K., Willems, B., & Onaral, B. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.023 · Cited by 650
Landslide erosion controlled by hillslope material
Larsen, I. J., Montgomery, D. R., & Korup, O. (2010) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo776 · Cited by 649
Buffers, barriers and blankets: The (dis)connectivity of catchment-scale sediment cascades
Fryirs, K., Brierley, G., Preston, N. J., et al. (2006) · CATENA · doi:10.1016/j.catena.2006.07.007 · Cited by 644
Structural Stability And Morphogenesis
Thom, R. (2018) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780429493027 · Cited by 625
Evolutionary consequences of niche construction and their implications for ecology
Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, F. J., & Feldman, M. W. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.18.10242 · Cited by 624
Sediment connectivity: a framework for understanding sediment transfer at multiple scales
Bracken, L. J., Turnbull, L., Wainwright, J., & Bogaart, P. W. (2014) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.3635 · Cited by 621
The measurement of drivers' mental workload
de Waard, D. (1996) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 619
Comparing landslide inventory maps
Galli, M., Ardizzone, F., Cardinali, M., et al. (2007) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.09.023 · Cited by 608
Impact of Climate Change on Hydrological Regimes and Water Resources Management in the Rhine Basin
Middelkoop, H., Daamen, K., Gellens, D., Grabs, W., Kwadijk, J., Lang, H., Parmet, B. W. A. H., Schädler, B., Schulla, J., & Wilke, K. R. (2001) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1023/a:1010784727448 · Cited by 604
Large wood and fluvial processes
Gurnell, A. M., Piégay, H., Swanson, F. J., et al. (2002) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00916.x · Cited by 601
Poff, N. L., & WARD, J. V. (1990) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/bf02394714 · Cited by 599
Geomorphic Thresholds: The Concept and Its Applications
Schumm, S. A. (1979) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.2307/622211 · Cited by 598
The ecology and management of aquatic-terrestrial ecotones.
Naiman, R. J., & Décamps, H. (1990) · Cited by 564
Situation Awareness Is Adaptive, Externally Directed Consciousness
Smith, K. C. S., & Hancock, P. A. (1995) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872095779049444 · Cited by 551
Self-citationMass wasting triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake is greater than orogenic growth
Parker, R. N., Densmore, A. L., Rosser, N. J., et al. (2011) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo1154 · Cited by 550
Geomorphic thresholds in riverine landscapes
Church, M. A. (2002) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00919.x · Cited by 543
The life history of Salicaceae living in the active zone of floodplains
Karrenberg, S., Edwards, P. J., & Kollmann, J. (2002) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00894.x · Cited by 524
Physical Geography: A Systems Approach
Clayton, K., Chorley, R. J., & Kennedy, B. A. (1972) · Geographical Journal · doi:10.2307/1795984 · Cited by 523
Gurnell, A. M., Bertoldi, W., & Corenblit, D. (2011) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.11.005 · Cited by 518
The Evolutionary Biology of Plants.
Simpson, B. B., & Niklas, K. J. (1997) · Systematic Botany · doi:10.2307/2419438 · Cited by 487
Studies of the morphological activity of rivers as illustrated by the River Fyris
Hjulström, F. (1935) · Cited by 486
Biodiversity: towards a unifying theme for river ecology
Ward, & Tockner (2001) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2001.00713.x · Cited by 485
Ecology, evolution and 1f-noise
Halley, J. M. (1996) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(96)81067-6 · Cited by 483
Willis, K. J., & McElwain, J. C. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/hesc/9780199292233.001.0001 · Cited by 478
Regan, M., Lee, J. D., & Young, K. L. (2008) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420007497 · Cited by 470
Wainwright, J., Turnbull, L., Ibrahim, T. G., Lexartza‐Artza, I., Thornton, S. F., & Brazier, R. E. (2010) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.07.027 · Cited by 458
Usability measurement in context
Bevan, N., & MACLEOD, M. (1994) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449299408914592 · Cited by 456
Effective timescales of coupling within fluvial systems
Harvey, A. M. (2002) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/s0169-555x(01)00174-x · Cited by 454
Aviation space & environmental medicine
Missoni, E. (2003) · Cited by 440
Recent climatic change and catastrophic geomorphic processes in mountain environments
Evans, S. G., & Clague, J. J. (1994) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/0169-555x(94)90011-6 · Cited by 434
Corenblit, D., Baas, A. C. W., Bornette, G., Darrozes, J., Delmotte, S., Francis, R. A., Gurnell, A. M., Julien, F., Naiman, R. J., & Steiger, J. (2011) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.03.002 · Cited by 425
Giant landslides, topography, and erosion
Korup, O., Clague, J. J., Hermanns, R. L., et al. (2007) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2007.07.025 · Cited by 408
Effects of vegetation on channel morphodynamics: results and insights from laboratory experiments
Tal, M., & Paola, C. (2010) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.1908 · Cited by 407
Young, M. S., & Stanton, N. A. (2002) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/0018720024497709 · Cited by 406
Self-citationDissociation of Performance and Subjective Measures of Workload
Yeh, Y., & Wickens, C. D. (1988) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872088803000110 · Cited by 365
Self-citationThresholds and the spatial variability of flood power during extreme floods
Magilligan, F. J. (1992) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/0169-555x(92)90014-f · Cited by 360
Channel widening and flood-plain construction along Cimarron River in southwestern Kansas
Schumm, S. A., & Lichty, R. W. (1963) · USGS professional paper · doi:10.3133/pp352d · Cited by 355
River adjustment to altered hydrologic regimen - Murrumbidgee River and paleochannels, Australia
Schumm, S. A. (1968) · USGS professional paper · doi:10.3133/pp598 · Cited by 351
Wickens, C. D., & McCarley, J. S. (2019) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780429059261 · Cited by 350
Self-citationMental workload : its theory and measurement
Moray, N. P. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 343
Sources of nonlinearity and complexity in geomorphic systems
Phillips, J. D. (2003) · Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment · doi:10.1191/0309133303pp340ra · Cited by 343
Tools in Fluvial Geomorphology
Piégay, H., & Kondolf, M. G. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118648551 · Cited by 342
Neuroergonomics: a review of applications to physical and cognitive work
Mehta, R. K., & Parasuraman, R. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00889 · Cited by 342
Davies, N. S., & Gibling, M. R. (2009) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2009.11.002 · Cited by 339
Bloom, D. E. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1209290 · Cited by 338
Patterns in vascular land plant diversification
Niklas, K. J., Tiffney, B. H., & Knoll, A. H. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/303614a0 · Cited by 327
Loft, S. D., Sanderson, P. M., Neal, A. F., & Mooij, M. (2007) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872007x197017 · Cited by 321
Measurement and analysis methods of heart rate and respiration for use in applied environments
Mulder, L. J. M. (1992) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/0301-0511(92)90016-n · Cited by 318
Island‐dominated landscapes of large floodplain rivers, a European perspective
Gurnell, A. M., & PETTS, G. E. (2002) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00923.x · Cited by 300
Human factors of advanced technology (glass cockpit) transport aircraft
Wiener, E. L. (1989) · NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) · Cited by 294
Effects of deposited wood on biocomplexity of river corridors
Gurnell, A. M., Tockner, K., Edwards, P. J., et al. (2005) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0377:eodwob]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 291
To interpret the earth: ten ways to be wrong
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3911 · Cited by 287
Late Precambrian Oxygenation; Inception of the Clay Mineral Factory
Kennedy, M. J., Droser, M. L., Mayer, L. M., Pevear, D. R., & Mrofka, D. D. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1118929 · Cited by 286
Toward an integration of evolutionary biology and ecosystem science
Matthews, B., Narwani, A., Hausch, S. J., Nonaka, E., Peter, H., Yamamichi, M., Sullam, K. E., Bird, K. C., Thomas, M. K., Hanley, T. C., et al. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01627.x · Cited by 285
Corenblit, D., Steiger, J., Gurnell, A. M., et al. (2009) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.1876 · Cited by 284
Linking continental-slope failures and climate change: Testing the clathrate gun hypothesis
Maslin, M. A., Owen, M. J., Day, S. J., & Long, D. A. (2003) · Geology · doi:10.1130/g20114.1 · Cited by 281
Kantowitz, B. H. (1987) · Advances in psychology · Cited by 280
EARLY HISTORY OF ARTHROPOD AND VASCULAR PLANT ASSOCIATIONS
Labandeira, C. C. (1998) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.26.1.329 · Cited by 279
Ice, moraine, and landslide dams in mountainous terrain
Korup, O., & Tweed, F. S. (2007) · Quaternary Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2007.10.012 · Cited by 274
A timeline for terrestrialization: consequences for the carbon cycle in the Palaeozoic
Kenrick, P., Wellman, C. H., Schneider, H., & Edgecombe, G. D. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0271 · Cited by 274
Wickens, C. D., & McCarley, J. S. (2007) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420063363 · Cited by 273
Self-citationGeomorphically effective floods
Costa, J. E., & O’Connor, J. E. (1995) · Geophysical monograph · doi:10.1029/gm089p0045 · Cited by 270
Agricultural influence on landscape sensitivity in the Upper Mississippi River Valley
Knox, J. C. (2001) · CATENA · doi:10.1016/s0341-8162(00)00138-7 · Cited by 267
Nutrient Spiralling in Streams: Implications for Nutrient Limitation and Invertebrate Activity
Newbold, J. D., O’Neill, R. V., Elwood, J. W., et al. (1982) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284017 · Cited by 263
Biomorphodynamics: Physical‐biological feedbacks that shape landscapes
Murray, A. B., Knaapen, M. A. F., Tal, M., et al. (2008) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2007wr006410 · Cited by 256
Subjective rating scales: science or art?
Annett, J. (2002) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140130210166951 · Cited by 252
Trees as riparian engineers: the Tagliamento river, Italy
Gurnell, A. M., & Petts, G. E. (2006) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.1342 · Cited by 252
Friis, E. M., Pedersen, K. R., & Crane, P. R. (1999) · Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden · doi:10.2307/2666179 · Cited by 251
Quasi-equilibrium states in channel morphology
Langbein, W. B., & Leopold, L. B. (1964) · American Journal of Science · doi:10.2475/ajs.262.6.782 · Cited by 246
Workload transition: Implications for individual and team performance.
Huey, B. M., & Wickens, C. D. (1993) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · Cited by 245
Self-citationThe use of psychophysiology to assess driver status
Brookhuis, K., & de Waard, D. (1993) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139308967981 · Cited by 245
Self-citationGeomorphology and ecology: Unifying themes for complex systems in biogeomorphology
Stallins, J. A. (2006) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.01.005 · Cited by 245
The Tagliamento River: A model ecosystem of European importance
Tockner, K., Ward, J., Arscott, D., Edwards, P., Kollmann, J., Gurnell, A., Petts, G., & Maiolini, B. (2003) · Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00027-003-0699-9 · Cited by 242
Eeckhaut, M. V. D., Poesen, J., Govers, G., et al. (2007) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2007.01.040 · Cited by 241
Climate and vegetational regime shifts in the late Paleozoic ice age earth
DiMichele, W. A., Montañez, I. P., Poulsen, C. J., & Tabor, N. J. (2009) · Geobiology · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4669.2009.00192.x · Cited by 228
Plant resistance to mechanical stress: evidence of an avoidance–tolerance trade‐off
Puijalon, S., Bouma, T. J., Douady, C. J., van Groenendael, J., Anten, N. P. R., Martel, E., & Bornette, G. (2011) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03763.x · Cited by 227
Minimum stream power and river channel patterns
Chang, H. H. (1979) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(79)90068-4 · Cited by 221
Evolutionary geomorphology: thresholds and nonlinearity in landform response to environmental change
Phillips, J. D. (2006) · Hydrology and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-10-731-2006 · Cited by 221
Climate change and geomorphological hazards in the eastern European Alps
Keiler, M., Knight, J., & Harrison, S. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0047 · Cited by 219
Fossil evidence of water lilies (Nymphaeales) in the Early Cretaceous
Friis, E. M., Pedersen, K. R., & Crane, P. R. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35066557 · Cited by 218
Metzger, U., & Parasuraman, R. (2005) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/0018720053653802 · Cited by 217
Under niche construction: an operational bridge between ecology, evolution, and ecosystem science
Matthews, B., Meester, L. D., Jones, C. G., Ibelings, B. W., Bouma, T. J., Nuutinen, V., van de Koppel, J., & Odling‐Smee, J. (2013) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/13-0953.1 · Cited by 214
Recent and future warm extreme events and high-mountain slope stability
Huggel, C., Salzmann, N., Allen, S., et al. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0078 · Cited by 214
Allen, S., Cox, S. C., & Owens, I. F. (2010) · Landslides · doi:10.1007/s10346-010-0222-z · Cited by 214
Giant cladoxylopsid trees resolve the enigma of the Earth’s earliest forest stumps at Gilboa
Stein, W. E., Mannolini, F., Hernick, L. V., Landing, E., & Berry, C. M. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05705 · Cited by 212
Surprisingly complex community discovered in the mid-Devonian fossil forest at Gilboa
Stein, W. E., Berry, C. M., Hernick, L. V., & Mannolini, F. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10819 · Cited by 208
Gensel, P. G. (2008) · Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173526 · Cited by 200
The Fragility of Ecosystems: A Review
Nilsson, C. F., & Grelsson, G. (1995) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2404808 · Cited by 200
Dott, R. H. (2003) · The Journal of Geology · doi:10.1086/375286 · Cited by 199
Multi-thread river channels: A perspective on changing European alpine river systems
Gurnell, A. M., Surian, N., & Zanoni, L. (2009) · Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00027-009-9186-2 · Cited by 198
Biogeomorphology revisited: looking towards the future
Naylor, L. A., VILES, H. A., & Carter, N. E. A. (2002) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/s0169-555x(02)00137-x · Cited by 196
Bertoldi, W., Gurnell, A. M., & Drake, N. (2011) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2010wr010319 · Cited by 194
Bertoldi, W., Drake, N. A., & Gurnell, A. M. (2011) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.2166 · Cited by 189
Geomorphic control of denitrification in large river floodplain soils
Pinay, G., Black, V., Planty-Tabacchi, A., Gumiero, B., & Décamps, H. (2000) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1023/a:1006317004639 · Cited by 188
Mental Workload and Situation Awareness
Tsang, P. S., & Vidulich, M. A. (2006) · doi:10.1002/0470048204.ch9 · Cited by 187
Phillips, J. D. (2006) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.01.039 · Cited by 186
Buatois, L. A., Mángano, M. G., Genise, J. F., & Taylor, T. N. (1998) · Palaios · doi:10.2307/3515447 · Cited by 184
Disturbance Regimes and Life-History Evolution
Lytle, D. A. (2001) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/319930 · Cited by 183
Grundgeiger, T., Sanderson, P. M., MacDougall, H. G., & Venkatesh, B. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/a0021912 · Cited by 183
A model of plant strategies in fluvial hydrosystems
Bornette, G., Tabacchi, É., Hupp, C. R., Puijalon, S., & Rostan, J. C. (2008) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.01994.x · Cited by 182
Human Performance, Workload, and Situational Awareness Measures Handbook
Gawron, V. J. (2008) · doi:10.1201/9781420064506 · Cited by 182
(1979) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0884-4 · Cited by 181
Landscape memory: the imprint of the past on contemporary landscape forms and processes
Brierley, G. (2009) · Area · doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2009.00900.x · Cited by 178
Differences of drivers’ reaction times according to age and mental workload
Makishita, H., & Matsunaga, K. (2007) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2007.08.012 · Cited by 177
Allen, J. R. L. (1974) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/0012-8252(74)90109-3 · Cited by 177
Hierarchies and spatial scale in process geomorphology: a review
BOER, D. H. D. (1992) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/0169-555x(92)90026-k · Cited by 175
Does scale‐dependent feedback explain spatial complexity in salt‐marsh ecosystems?
van Wesenbeeck, B. K., van de Koppel, J., Herman, P. M. J., et al. (2007) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.16245.x · Cited by 175
Surian, N., Ziliani, L., Comiti, F., et al. (2009) · River Research and Applications · doi:10.1002/rra.1231 · Cited by 175
Rogers, K. H., & Biggs, H. (1999) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.00441.x · Cited by 175
The role of vegetation and bed-level fluctuations in the process of channel narrowing
Friedman, J. M., Osterkamp, W. R., & Lewis, W. M. (1996) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/0169-555x(95)00047-9 · Cited by 174
Real and apparent changes in sediment deposition rates through time
Schumer, R. A., & Jerolmack, D. J. (2009) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2009jf001266 · Cited by 174
Novelty, Adaptive Capacity, and Resilience
Allen, C. R., & Holling, C. S. (2010) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-03720-150324 · Cited by 172
Lansdown, T. C., Brook-Carter, N., & Kersloot, T. (2004) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140130310001629775 · Cited by 172
Driver workload during differing driving maneuvers
Hancock, P. A., Wulf, G., Thom, D. R., et al. (1990) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/0001-4575(90)90019-h · Cited by 172
Self-citationImpact of climate change on the hydrology of St. Lawrence tributaries
Boyer, C., Chaumont, D., Chartier, I., et al. (2010) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.01.011 · Cited by 172
Bouma, T., Temmerman, S., van Duren, L. A., et al. (2012) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.09.005 · Cited by 171
Minimum Unit Stream Power and Fluvial Hydraulics
Yang, C. T. (1976) · Journal of the Hydraulics Division · doi:10.1061/jyceaj.0004589 · Cited by 171
Ecological response to and management of increased flooding caused by climate change
Poff, N. L. (2002) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2002.1012 · Cited by 170
The origins of modern biodiversity on land
Benton, M. J. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0269 · Cited by 168
Characterizing geomorphological change to support sustainable river restoration and management
Grabowski, R., Surian, N., & Gurnell, A. M. (2014) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water · doi:10.1002/wat2.1037 · Cited by 167
Natural hazards, extreme events, and mountain topography
Korup, O., & Clague, J. J. (2009) · Quaternary Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.02.021 · Cited by 167
Törnros, J., & Bolling, A. (2006) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2006.01.008 · Cited by 166
The Influence of Complex Systems Interactions on Barrier Island Dune Vegetation Pattern and Process
Stallins, J. A., & Parker, A. J. (2003) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1111/1467-8306.93102 · Cited by 164
Disturbance regimes of stream and riparian systems ? a disturbance-cascade perspective
Nakamura, F., Swanson, F. J., & Wondzell, S. M. (2000) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/1099-1085(200011/12)14:16/17 · Cited by 164
Evolutionary trajectory of channel morphology and controlling factors in a large gravel-bed river
Ziliani, L., & Surian, N. (2012) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.06.001 · Cited by 161
Cyclic changes in Pennsylvanian paleoclimate and effects on floristic dynamics in tropical Pangaea
DiMichele, W. A., Cecil, C. B., Montañez, I. P., et al. (2010) · International Journal of Coal Geology · doi:10.1016/j.coal.2010.01.007 · Cited by 161
Newson, M. D. (1980) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.3760050102 · Cited by 158
Archaeopteris is the earliest known modern tree
Meyer‐Berthaud, B., Scheckler, S. E., & Wendt, J. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/19516 · Cited by 157
Earth Surface Systems: Complexity, Order and Scale
Phillips, J. D. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 156
Geomorphic and Sedimentological Controls on the Effectiveness of an Extreme Flood
Magilligan, F. J., Phillips, J. D., James, L. A., et al. (1998) · The Journal of Geology · doi:10.1086/516009 · Cited by 156
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Aoyama, T., and M.Umemura. 1991. “An Examination of the Mental Workload of Design Work in Offices.” In Towards Human Work: Solutions to Problems in Occupational Health and Safety, edited by M.Kumashiro, and E. D.Megaw, 243–249. London: Taylor & Francis.
- Bainbridge L., 1974, Le Travail Humain, 37, 279
- Basahel, A. M., M. S.Young, and M.Ajovalasit. 2010. “Effects of Interaction between Physical and Mental Workload on Human Performance.” In Contemporary Ergonomics and Human Factors 2010, edited by M.Anderson, 598–601. London: Taylor & Francis.
- 2014, InProceedings of the HFES International Annual Meeting
- 2010, Chap. 5.7 in NASA Human Integration Design Handbook (HIDH), 190
- Hayashi Y., 1988, Journal of Science of Labour, 64, 257
- Hayashi Y., 1987, Journal of Science of Labour, 63, 351
- Jarvenpaa, E.1990. “Mental Workload in Different Phases of the Implementation of New Technology: The Implementation of Office Automation as an Example.” In Proceedings of the International Ergonomics Association Conference on Human Factors in Design for Manufacturability and Process Planning , 159–163.
- Kuriyagawa, Y., and I. Kageyama. 2003. “A Study on the Evaluation Model of Mental Workload for Drivers.” In Ergonomics in the Digital Age. Proceedings of the XVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and the 7th Joint Conference of the Ergonomics Society of Korea and the Japan Ergonomics Society .
- Lenior, T. M. J., and M. P.Gobel. 1997. “Predicting Mental Workload for Train Traffic Control Tasks.” In From Experience to Innovation - IEA ’97. Proceedings of the 13th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, edited by P.Seppala, T.Luopajarvi, C. H.Nygard, and M.Mattila, 358–360. Finnish Institut.
- Loewenthal, A., M.Chignell, and P.Hancock. 1985. “Use of Mental Workload Measures in Interface Design.” In IEEE 1985 Proceedings of the International Conference on Cybernetics and Society, 624–626. New York: IEEE.
- Low, I.2003. “Assessment of the Impact on Mental Workload from Advanced Air Traffic Management Systems: A Diagnostic Tool.” In Ergonomics in the Digital Age. Proceedings of the XVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and the 7th Joint Conference of the Ergonomics Society of Korea and the Japan Ergonomics Society .
- Pickup, L., J.Wilson, and T.Clarke. 2003. “Mental Workload of the Railway Signaller.” In Contemporary Ergonomics, edited by P. T.McCabe, 397–402. London: Taylor & Francis.
- Schlegel, R. E.1993. “Driver Mental Workload.” In Automotive Ergonomics, edited by B.Peacock, and W.Karwowski, 359–382. London: Taylor & Francis.
- Wickens, C., T.Bagnall, M.Gosakan, and B.Walters. 2011. “Modeling Single Pilot Control of Multiple UAVs.” In Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, available in CD-ROM format edited by M.Vidulich, and P.Tsang. Dayton, OH: Wright State University.
- Wickens, C. D., and J. G.Hollands. 2000. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. 3rd ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
- Wilson, J. R., and J. A.Rajan. 1995. “Human-Machine Interfaces for Systems Control.” In Evaluation of Human Work: A Practical Ergonomics Methodology, edited by J. R.Wilson, and E. N.Corlett, 357–405. London: Taylor & Francis.
- Young M. S., 1997, International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 1, 325
- Young, M., and N.Stanton. 1998. “What's Skill Got to Do with It? Vehicle Automation and Driver Mental Workload.” In Contemporary Ergonomics 1998, edited by M. A.Hanson, 436–440. London: Taylor & Francis.
- Young, M. S., and N. A.Stanton. 2005. “Mental workload.” In Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods, edited by N. A.Stanton, A.Hedge, K.Brookhuis, E.Salas, and H. W.Hendrick. Chap. 39. London: Taylor & Francis.
- Zijlstra, F. R. H.1993. “Efficiency in Work Behavior. A Design Approach for Modern Tools.” PhD diss., Delft University of Technology. Delft: Delft University Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
EEG power spectral measures of cognitive workload: A meta‐analysis
Chikhi, S., Matton, N., & Blanchet, S. (2022) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.14009 · Cited by 258
Human Mental Workload: A Survey and a Novel Inclusive Definition
Longo, L., Wickens, C. D., Hancock, G., & Hancock, P. A. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.883321 · Cited by 222
Self-citationShan, Y., Shang, J., Yan, Y., & Ye, X. (2023) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-023-01209-9 · Cited by 79
Cosic, K., Kuljanac, A., & Palermo, S. (2026) · Frontiers in psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1821242 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Young, M. S., Brookhuis, K. A., Wickens, C. D., & Hancock, P. A.
- Affiliations
- Brunel University of London (GB)
- University of Groningen (NL)
- University of Central Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Young, Mark S.
- Venue
- Ergonomics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-12-02
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-17
- ISSN
- 0014-0139 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5847
- OpenAlex
- W2076883103
- Cited by
- 948
- References
- 406
- Citations by year
- 2026: 104 · 2025: 117 · 2024: 85 · 2023: 101 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 19
- FWCI
- 4.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Ergonomics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Ergonomics and Human Factors
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Keywords
- mental workload, workload measurement, operator performance, complex system design, physical workload, safety-critical systems, human factors
- MeSH terms
- Cognition, Humans, Ergonomics, Task Performance and Analysis, Workload
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review