Cited by 66Pain Management and Placebo EffectPain Management and TreatmentMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Hypnotic Analgesia for Chronic Pain in Persons with Disabilities: A Case Series Abstract

Jensen, Mark P., Hanley, Marisol A., Engel, Joyce M., Romano, Joan M., Barber, Joseph, Cardenas, Diana D., Kraft, George H., Hoffman, and, Amy J. +1 more·2005·International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis

Abstract

Thirty-three adults with chronic pain and a disability were treated with hypnotic analgesia. Analyses showed significant pre- to posttreatment changes in average pain intensity that was maintained at 3-month follow-up. Significant changes were also found in pain unpleasantness and perceived control over pain but not in pain interference or depressive symptoms. Hypnotizability, concentration of treatment (e.g., daily vs. up to weekly), and initial response to treatment were not significantly associated with treatment outcome. However, treatment-outcome expectancy assessed after the first session showed a moderate association with treatment outcome. The findings support the use of hypnotic analgesia for the treatment of pain in persons with disabilities for some patients but not the use of pretreatment measures of hypnotizability or treatment-outcome expectancy for screening patients for treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00207140590927545

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a combined total of 82 individuals with various diagnoses associated with physical disability and chronic pain, treatment-response rates to 10 sessions of self-hypnosis training varied from 22% for spinal cord injury to 60% for acquired amputation.

    “A 30% or more reduction in average pain identified treatment responders, and analyses showed treatment-response rates varied from a low of 22% for individuals with spinal cord injury to 60% for persons with acquired amputation.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jensen, M. P., Hanley, M. A., Engel, J. M., Romano, J. M., Barber, J., Cardenas, D. D., Kraft, G. H., Hoffman, A., & Patterson, D. R.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Jensen, Mark P.
Venue
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
Published
2005-04
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
198-228
ISSN
  • 0020-7144 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5183
OpenAlex
W1981616179
Cited by
66
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD042838, R01 HD42838)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
hypnotic analgesia, chronic pain, people with disabilities, hypnotic susceptibility, pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, pain interference, depressive symptoms
MeSH terms
Adult, Analgesia, Chronic Disease, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Humans, Hypnosis, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review