Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 6

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

WISE: A Support Group for Graduate and Post-Graduate Women in STEM

Gold, Jessica A., Jia, Lena, Bentzley, Jessica P., Bonnet, Kacy A., Franciscus, Amanda M., Denduluri, Meenakshi S., Zappert, Laraine T.·2021·International Journal of Group Psychotherapy
DOI 10.1080/00207284.2020.1722674
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Women remain underrepresented in many science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. Women in Science and Engineering (WISE) support groups were developed in 2001 as an intervention to foster community in graduate and postgraduate women in STEM at a large academic research institution. Since the WISE program's inception, over 1,500 women have participated. From 2011 to 2018, anonymous, voluntary surveys were distributed at the end of every academic year to WISE group members. Surveys consisted of quantitative and qualitative data regarding participants' perceptions of and experiences in the WISE groups. From 2011 to 2018, 76.4% of survey respondents (n = 416) reported that WISE groups were an excellent experience overall. Thematic analysis of the qualitative data demonstrated four major benefits of WISE group participation: creation of community, having a safe space, emotional support, and peer mentorship. Suggestions for improvement included increasing access to groups. The WISE group program was a well-liked intervention that may support graduate and postgraduate women in STEM. Study limitations, as well as implications for future research, practice, and advocacy are noted.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00207284.2020.1722674

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 70

  1. Andersen M., 2004, Race, class and gender: An anthology
  2. 10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.004 · DOI
  3. Berkman L. F., 2000, Social epidemiology (pp. 158–162), 10.1093/oso/9780195083316.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1521/ijgp.2008.58.4.455 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/09540250500145072 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/jee.1998.87.issue-4 · DOI
  7. Brown S. V., 2000, Race, ethnicity, and the scientific enterprise, 239, 10.1093/oso/9780195107746.003.0022 · DOI
  8. 10.4337/9781847206879 · DOI
  9. Burlingame G. M., 2002, Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients, 71
  10. 10.1037/1089-2699.7.1.3 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1080/01933921003706014 · DOI
  12. Burrelli J., 2009, Paper presented at the Mini-Symposium on Women of Color in STEM
  13. 10.1097/01.ACM.0000232425.27041.88 · DOI
  14. 10.2190/M447-1X11-6566-8042 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1080/08952833.2016.1273174 · DOI
  16. 10.1177/0003122411420815 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.04.003 · DOI
  18. 10.1187/cbe.16-01-0036 · DOI
  19. Corbett C., 2015, Solving the equation: The variables for women’s success in engineering and computing
  20. 10.1073/pnas.1422822112 · DOI
  21. 10.1073/pnas.1613117114 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s11606-010-1486-7 · DOI
  23. 10.1300/J009v17n01_10 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01091-0 · DOI
  25. 10.1017/CBO9780511541414 · DOI
  26. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1995.tb00162.x · DOI
  27. Fouad N., 2011, Stemming the tide: Why Women leave engineering
  28. 10.1177/0002764209356234 · DOI
  29. 10.1002/1097-4679(198311)39:6<893::AID-JCLP2270390612>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
  30. Glanz K., 2008, Health behavior and health education
  31. Glaser B. G., 1967, The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research
  32. 10.2307/202051 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1177/1359105308097963 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/S0272-7358(01)001012-7 · DOI
  35. 10.2182/cjot.06.05x · DOI
  36. 10.1023/A:1010344929577 · DOI
  37. 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v9.i1 · DOI
  38. 10.3928/01484834-20100730-06 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.040 · DOI
  40. 10.1002/pon.932 · DOI
  41. Litzler E., 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition
  42. 10.1080/01973533.2011.614166 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1080/01609513.2011.587099 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/S0747-5632(03)00040-2 · DOI
  45. 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v14.i2.30 · DOI
  46. 10.17226/24994 · DOI
  47. 10.17226/11741 · DOI
  48. 10.1002/tea.v55.2 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/S0007-6813(05)90037-0 · DOI
  50. 10.1177/089826439500700306 · DOI
  51. 10.1007/978-3-319-08629-3 · DOI
  52. 10.1007/s10464-008-9181-0 · DOI
  53. 10.1002/rnj.2004.29.issue-2 · DOI
  54. 10.1080/1360080990210103 · DOI
  55. 10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.529 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1177/0361684312468727 · DOI
  57. 10.1207/s15327027hc19025 · DOI
  58. 10.1002/j.2161-1912.2008.tb00081.x · DOI
  59. 10.1017/CBO9780511557842 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Strauss A. L., 2008, Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques
  61. 10.1007/s10755-014-9300-9 · DOI
  62. 10.1007/BF00978097 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.019 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.044 · DOI
  65. 10.1080/03630240903239719 · DOI
  66. 10.1080/09540250020004126 · DOI
  67. 10.4324/9781315726243 · DOI
  68. 10.1093/her/16.6.693 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Yalom I. D., 2005, The theory and practice of group psychotherapy
  70. Zappert L. T., 1985, “In the pipeline”: A comparative analysis of men and women in science

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gold, J. A., Jia, L., Bentzley, J. P., Bonnet, K. A., Franciscus, A. M., Denduluri, M. S., & Zappert, L. T.
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Group Psychotherapy
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2020-03-03
Volume
71
Issue
1
Pages
81-115
ISSN
  • 0020-7284
  • 1943-2836
DOI
10.1080/00207284.2020.1722674
Cited by
6
References
6
Language
en
Funders
Office of Graduate Education and the Office of the Provost at Stanford University

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.