Cited by 206Historical and Modern Theater StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

PRELIMINARY VALIDITY OF “INTEGNEUROTM”: A NEW COMPUTERIZED BATTERY OF NEUROCOGNITIVE TESTS

PAUL, ROBERT H., LAWRENCE, JEFFREY, WILLIAMS, LEANNE M., RICHARD, C. CLARK, COOPER, NICHOLAS, GORDON, EVIAN·2005·International Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the preliminary validity of a newly developed battery of computerized cognitive measures, IntegNeuro. This standardized and semi-automated computerized battery assesses sensori-motor function, attention, new learning and memory, language fluency, executive function, and estimated intelligence. A total of 50 healthy individuals (aged 22-80 years) were included in the study. Correlational analyses revealed highly significant associations between the two cognitive batteries. These results support the use of IntegNeuro as a computerized cognitive system. Additional studies are needed to examine the clinical utility of the battery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00207450590957890

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PAUL, R. H., LAWRENCE, J., WILLIAMS, L. M., RICHARD, C. C., COOPER, N., & GORDON, E.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
International Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2005-01
Volume
115
Issue
11
Pages
1549-1567
ISSN
  • 0020-7454 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-5245
OpenAlex
W2043649648
Cited by
206
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
18.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
computerized cognitive assessment, test validity, sensorimotor function, attention, memory, language fluency, executive function, intelligence estimation, healthy adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Attention, Cognition, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Language, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted, Problem Solving, Psychomotor Performance, Sex Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review