Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 328

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Implementing lean production systems: research areas and opportunities for future studies

Marodin, Giuliano Almeida, Saurin, Tarcisio Abreu·2013·International Journal of Production Research
DOI 10.1080/00207543.2013.826831
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The increasing use of lean production (LP) by companies from several sectors has substantially increased the amount of publications and different emphases on the subject, which amplifies the need for organisation of that knowledge. This article aims to identify the research areas on LP implementation and to propose research opportunities. The literature review was based on 102 studies published in the years between 1996 and 2012. The studies were divided into six research areas, named: (a) structure and scope of LP systems; (b) factors that influence in the LP implementation; (c) methods for implementing LP systems; (d) LP assessment methods; (e) results of implementing LP systems; and (f) adaptation of LP to particular sectors. The findings suggested that the substantial increase on the amount of publications on LP implementation has created fragmented and dissociated areas that would benefit from integration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00207543.2013.826831

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Marodin, G. A., & Saurin, T. A.
Venue
International Journal of Production Research
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2013-08-12
Volume
51
Issue
22
Pages
6663-6680
ISSN
  • 0020-7543 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-588X
DOI
10.1080/00207543.2013.826831
OpenAlex
W1972017400
Cited by
328
References
4
FWCI
37.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.