The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conspiracy Stereotypes of Jews During Systemic Transformation in Poland
Abstract
The nature and functioning of the conspiracy theories of Jews in present-day Poland have been analyzed using a variety of methodological approaches (surveys, naturalistic experiments, cross-sectional studies). We examine (a) functional differences between conspiracy stereotypes and trait-laden stereotypes of Jews, (b) situational factors of the political milieu that modify accessibility of the conspiracy theories of Jews and their impact on attitudes, and (c) the role of value orientations and perceptions of outgroup entitativity and essentialism in conspiracy thinking. The broader implications of our findings for understanding systemic transition in Poland in the past fifteen years are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“and those perceived as enemies (Kofta & Sedek, 2005).”
From The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories (2017) · cites this paper as Kofta & Sedek, 2005
Citations
Cites
Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.878 · Cited by 2,451
Essentialist beliefs about social categories
Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2000) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466600164363 · Cited by 1,046
Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity.
Lickel, B. A., Hamilton, D. L., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A. C., Sherman, S. J., & Uhles, A. N. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.223 · Cited by 942
Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds?
Rothbart, M., & Taylor, M. (1992) · Cited by 493
Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R., Broadnax, S., & Blaine, B. E. (1999) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672992511003 · Cited by 283
Seeing groups as entities: The role of perceiver motivation.
Brewer, M. B., & Harasty, A. S. (1996) · Cited by 160
Moscovici, S. (1987) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4618-3_9 · Cited by 147
Quinley, H. E., & Glock, C. Y. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 140
Common Fate, Similarity and other Indices of the Status of Aggregates of Persons as Social Entities
Campbell, D. T. (1960) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-009237-9.50017-2 · Cited by 128
The Tenacity of Prejudice: Anti-Semitism in Contemporary America.
Poll, S., Selznick, G. J., & Steinberg, S. (1971) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2093159 · Cited by 67
Stereotypes of Groups, Group Members, and Individuals in Categories: A Differential Analysis
Horwitz, M., & Rabbie, J. M. (1989) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3582-8_5 · Cited by 35
Anti-Semitism in the United States
Lesser, A. (1941) · The Journal of Negro Education · doi:10.2307/2292758 · Cited by 22
Conspiracy Theory in Conflict Escalation
Pruitt, D. G. (1987) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4618-3_11 · Cited by 13
Heller, C. S., Quinley, H. E., & Glock, C. Y. (1982) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2578427 · Cited by 9
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding Conspiracy Theories
Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12568 · Cited by 1,511
The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories
Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2017) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721417718261 · Cited by 1,316
“Conspiracy belief has also been linked to prejudice against powerful groups (Imhoff & Bruder, 2014) and those perceived as enemies (Kofta & Sedek, 2005).”
BackgroundSpeaking (Un–)Truth to Power: Conspiracy Mentality as A Generalised Political Attitude
Imhoff, R., & Bruder, M. (2014) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.1930 · Cited by 831
“Prejudice against Jews has long been connected to conspiracy beliefs including, in particular, belief in a Jewish world conspiracy (Kofta & Sedek, 2005).”
BackgroundCichocka, A. K., Marchlewska, M., & de Zavala, A. G. (2015) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550615616170 · Cited by 390
Addicted to answers: need for cognitive closure and the endorsement of conspiracy beliefs
Marchlewska, M., Cichocka, A., & Kossowska, M. (2018) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2308 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- AND, M. K., & SEDEK, G.
- Affiliations
- a Institute for Social Studies and Psychology Faculty at Warsaw University
- b Warsaw School of Social Psychology
- Venue
- International Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-64
- ISSN
- 0020-7659 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9336
- OpenAlex
- W2575264202
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8
- FWCI
- 8.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Polish-Jewish Holocaust Memory Studies
- Keywords
- conspiracy theories, Jewish stereotypes, systemic change, post-communist transition, Poland, political attitudes, value orientations, essentialism, antisemitism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review