Cited by 831Misinformation and Its ImpactsSocial and Intergroup PsychologyTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence

Speaking (Un–)Truth to Power: Conspiracy Mentality as A Generalised Political Attitude

Imhoff, Roland, Bruder, Martin·2014·European Journal of Personality

Abstract

Conspiracy theories explain complex world events with reference to secret plots hatched by powerful groups. Belief in such theories is largely determined by a general propensity towards conspirational thinking. Such a conspiracy mentality can be understood as a generalised political attitude, distinct from established generalised political attitudes such as right–wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) (Study 1a, N = 497) that is temporally relatively stable (Study 1b and 1c, total N = 196). Three further studies (combined N = 854) show that in contrast to RWA and SDO, conspiracy mentality is related to prejudice against high–power groups that are perceived as less likeable and more threatening than low–power groups, whereas SDO and RWA are associated with an opposite reaction to perceptions of power. Study 5 (N = 1852) investigates the relationship of conspiracy mentality with political behavioural intentions in a specific catastrophic scenario (i.e. the damage to the Fukushima nuclear reactor after the 2011 tsunami in Japan) revealing a hitherto neglected role of conspiracy mentality in motivating social action aimed at changing the status quo. Copyright © 2013 European Association of Personality Psychology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/per.1930

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conspiracy belief has been linked to prejudice against powerful groups.

    “Conspiracy belief has also been linked to prejudice against powerful groups (Imhoff & Bruder, 2014)”

    From The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories (2017) · cites this paper as Imhoff & Bruder, 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Imhoff, R., & Bruder, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • University of Konstanz (DE)
Venue
European Journal of Personality
Published
2014-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
25-43
ISSN
  • 0890-2070 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0984
OpenAlex
W2148417036
Cited by
831
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 82 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 125 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 133 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
40.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Keywords
conspiracy mentality, conspiracy beliefs, conspiracy theories, right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, political attitudes, threat perception, political behavior, Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident, social action, personality stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review