The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protégé Perceptions of High Mentorship Quality Depend on Shared Values More Than on Demographic Match
Open accessAbstract
Mentoring, particularly same-gender and same-race mentoring, is increasingly seen as a powerful method to attract and retain more women and racial minorities into science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education and careers. This study examines elements of a mentoring dyad relationship (i.e., demographic and perceived similarity) that influence the quality of mentorship, as well as the effect of mentorship on STEM career commitment. A national sample of African American undergraduates majoring in STEM disciplines were surveyed in their senior year. Overall, perceived similarity, rather than demographic similarity, was the most important factor associated with protégé perceptions of high quality mentorship and high quality mentoring was in turn associated with higher commitment to STEM careers. We discuss the implications for mentoring underrepresented students and broadening participation in STEM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Cohen, P., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410606266 · Cited by 20,870
(2007) · Cited by 10,092
O’connor, B. P. (2000) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03200807 · Cited by 4,116
Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249 · Cited by 3,732
The Journal of College Science Teaching
(1971) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/ed048p284 · Cited by 3,314
Factor Retention Decisions in Exploratory Factor Analysis: a Tutorial on Parallel Analysis
Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428104263675 · Cited by 3,104
Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations
Velicer, W. F. (1976) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02293557 · Cited by 2,438
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1998) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256901 · Cited by 2,177
Phases of the Mentor Relationship.
Kram, K. E. (1983) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/255910 · Cited by 1,632
Mentoring and Undergraduate Academic Success: A Literature Review
Jacobi, M. (1991) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543061004505 · Cited by 1,392
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Atkins, K., Dougan, B. M., Dromgold-Sermen, M. S., Potter, H., Sathy, V., & Panter, A. T. (2020) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-020-00242-3 · Cited by 227
Gladstone, J. R., & Cimpian, A. (2021) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-021-00315-x · Cited by 293
Hernandez, P. R., Bloodhart, B., Barnes, R. T., Adams, A. S., Clinton, S. M., Pollack, I. B., Godfrey, E., Burt, M., & Fischer, E. V. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187531 · Cited by 185
Self-citationPatching the “leaky pipeline”: Interventions for women of color faculty in STEM academia.
Liu, S.-N. C., Brown, S. E. V., & Sabat, I. E. (2019) · Archives of Scientific Psychology · doi:10.1037/arc0000062 · Cited by 145
Estrada, M., Eroy-Reveles, A. A., & Matsui, J. (2018) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12046 · Cited by 126
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hernandez, P. R., Estrada, M., Woodcock, A., & Schultz, P. W.
- Affiliations
- West Virginia University (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- California State University, San Marcos (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hernandez, Paul R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Experimental Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-11-08
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 450-468
- ISSN
- 0022-0973 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-0683
- PMC
- PMC6205751
- OpenAlex
- W2556029992
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 32.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- The Journal of Experimental Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM075316)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Education › Mentoring and Academic Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Keywords
- mentoring, perceived similarity, demographic similarity, mentorship quality, underrepresented students, broadening participation in STEM
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
