The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Construction of Circumplex Scales for the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems
Abstract
We constructed a set of circumplex scales for the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP; Horowitz, Rosenberg, Baer, Ureno, & Villasenor, 1988). Initial scale construction used all 127 items from this instrument in two samples of university undergraduates (n = 197; n = 273). Cross-sample stability of item locations plotted against the first two principal components was high. A final set of eight 8-item circumplex scales was derived from the combined sample (n = 470) and cross-validated in a third university sample (n = 974). Finally, we examined the structural convergence of the IIP circumplex scales with an established measure of interpersonal dispositions, the Revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS-R; Wiggins, Trapnell, & Phillips, 1988). Although both circumplex instruments were derived independently, they shared a common Circular space. Implications of these results are discussed with reference to current research methods for the study of interpersonal behavior.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed
Cooper, A. M., & Michels, R. (1981) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.138.1.128 · Cited by 7,419
The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence
Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.472 · Cited by 5,173
Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety.
Watson, D., & Friend, R. (1969) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027806 · Cited by 3,467
Inventory of interpersonal problems: Psychometric properties and clinical applications.
Horowitz, L. M., Rosenberg, S. E., Baer, B. A., Ureño, G., & Villaseñor, V. S. (1988) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.56.6.885 · Cited by 2,026
A psychological taxonomy of trait‐descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain
Wiggins, J. S. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.395 · Cited by 1,596
Self-citationThe 1982 Interpersonal Circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions.
Kiesler, D. J. (1983) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.90.3.185 · Cited by 1,289
Structural analysis of social behavior.
Benjamin, L. S. (1974) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0037024 · Cited by 1,011
Interaction Concepts of Personality.
Hardert, R. A., & Carson, R. C. (1970) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094013 · Cited by 696
Psychometric and Geometric Characteristics of the Revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS-R)
Wiggins, J. S., Trapnell, P. D., & Phillips, N. (1988) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2304_8 · Cited by 613
Self-citationPsychotherapy In A New Key: A Guide To Time-limited Dynamic Psychotherapy
Strupp, H. H., & Binder, J. L. (1984) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 555
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model.
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.61.2.226 · Cited by 6,009
Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S. M., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022101032005001 · Cited by 2,292
Models of the self and other: Fundamental dimensions underlying measures of adult attachment.
Griffin, D. W., & Bartholomew, K. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.430 · Cited by 1,881
Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (1999) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.156.10.1563 · Cited by 1,416
Initial construction and validation of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory.
Pincus, A. L., Ansell, E. B., Pimentel, C. A., Cain, N. M., Wright, A. G. C., & Levy, K. N. (2009) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0016530 · Cited by 1,334
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Alden, L. E., Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, A. L.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality Assessment
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1990-12
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 521-536
- ISSN
- 0022-3891 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7752
- OpenAlex
- W1985866322
- Cited by
- 876
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 44
- FWCI
- 9.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality Assessment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- Inventory of Interpersonal Problems, interpersonal problems, circular space, scale development, cross-validation, interpersonal behavior
- MeSH terms
- Assertiveness, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Personality Inventory, Problem Solving, Psychometrics, Psychotherapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
