Cited by 53Personality Traits and PsychologyPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychological Testing and Assessment

The Narcissistic Personality Inventory: A Useful Tool for Assessing Pathological Narcissism? Evidence From Patients With Narcissistic Personality Disorder

Vater, Aline, Schröder-Abé, Michela, Ritter, Kathrin, Renneberg, Babette, Schulze, Lars, Bosson, Jennifer K., Roepke, Stefan·2013·Journal of Personality Assessment

Abstract

The Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) has dominated research on narcissism in the field of social and personality psychology. Surprisingly, it is unclear whether the NPI is useful for identifying pathological narcissism in patients with Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD). The goal of this study was to close this research gap. We used an extreme-group approach by including NPD patients and healthy controls and comparing their narcissism scores. We further investigated whether explicit self-esteem (assessed with the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale) suppressed the relationship between group membership and NPI narcissism. According to our results, NPD patients do not score higher on the NPI in comparison to healthy controls. Analysis of indirect effects revealed that differences in NPI scores are suppressed by NPD patients' low self-esteem. Our results indicate that the NPI is not a valid indicator of NPD, unless one controls for self-esteem. Implications for future research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00223891.2012.732636

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is challenging to interpret research from clinical samples, especially inpatient samples, as these cases tend to demonstrate very high comorbidity with other disorders (e.g., 60% for borderline personality disorder and approximately 66% for affective disorders) that are not traditionally considered near-neighbor disorders and whose co-presence may fundamentally affect the presentation of theseN

    “It is challenging to interpret research from clinical samples, especially inpatient samples (e.g., Morf et al. 2016, Vater et al. 2013), as these cases tend to demonstrate very high comorbidity with other disorders [e.g., 60% for borderline personality disorder (Vater et al. 2013) and approximately 66% for affective disorders (Morf et al. 2016)] that are not traditionally considered near-neighbor”

    From Controversies in Narcissism (2017) · cites this paper as Vater et al. 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vater, A., Schröder-Abé, M., Ritter, K., Renneberg, B., Schulze, L., Bosson, J. K., & Roepke, S.
Affiliations
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • University of South Florida (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality Assessment
Published
2013-05
Volume
95
Issue
3
Pages
301-308
ISSN
  • 0022-3891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7752
OpenAlex
W601338748
Cited by
53
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9
FWCI
7.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
Narcissistic Personality Inventory, narcissistic personality disorder, pathological narcissism, self-esteem, measurement validity, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, indirect effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Narcissism, Personality Disorders, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Self Concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review