Cited by 99Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Testing and AssessmentPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Convergence of Narcissism Measures From the Perspective of General Personality Functioning

Samuel, Douglas B., Widiger, Thomas A.·2008·Assessment

Abstract

The construct of narcissism has a lengthy history and has been operationalized and measured by a variety of instruments. In this study, five narcissism scales were compared in terms of alternative conceptualizations of narcissism offered by C. C. Morf and F. Rhodewalt (2001), D. L. Paulhus (2001), and S. Vazire and D. C. Funder (2006), using the domains and facets of the five-factor model as a common point of comparison. The findings provided little support for the conceptualizations of Morf and Rhodewalt or Vazire and Funder. Support was obtained for the conceptualization of Paulhus, particularly as assessed by the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and, secondarily, the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory—III. Implications for the assessment and conceptualization of narcissism are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1073191108314278

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Grandiose narcissism is typically characterized by attention seeking, arrogance, and self-enhancing and exaggerated self-worth, and individuals with grandiose narcissism are interpersonally domineering, antagonistic, and vindictive.

    “Grandiose narcissism is typically characterized by attention seeking, arrogance, and self-enhancing and exaggerated self-worth. These individuals have been found to be interpersonally domineering, antagonistic and vindictive [14, 74, 75, 84].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Samuel, Douglas B.
Venue
Assessment
Published
2008-02-29
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
364-374
ISSN
  • 1073-1911 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3489
OpenAlex
W2103226522
Cited by
99
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
11.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
narcissism, construct validity, Big Five personality traits, Narcissistic Personality Inventory, MCMI-III, personality functioning, personality assessment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Narcissism, Personality, Personality Disorders, Personality Tests, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Assessment, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review