Cited by 172Impact of Technology on AdolescentsTechnostress in Professional SettingsDigital Media and Philosophy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The burden of online friends: The effects of giving up Facebook on stress and well-being

Open access
Vanman, Eric J., Baker, Rosemary, Tobin, Stephanie J.·2018·The Journal of Social Psychology

Abstract

People occasionally choose to cut themselves off from their online social network by taking extended breaks from Facebook. This study investigated whether abstaining from Facebook reduces stress but also reduces subjective well-being because of the resulting social disconnection. Participants (138 active Facebook users) were assigned to either a condition in which they were instructed to give up Facebook for 5 days or continue to use Facebook as normal. Perceived stress and well-being, as well as salivary cortisol, were measured before and after the test period. Relative to those in the Facebook Normal condition, those in the No Facebook condition experienced lower levels of cortisol and life satisfaction. Our results suggest that the typical Facebook user may occasionally find the large amount of social information available to be taxing, and Facebook vacations could ameliorate this stress-at least in the short term.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00224545.2018.1453467

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ellison N. B., 2013, Paper presented at the 7th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media
  2. Kirschbaum C., 2000, Encyclopedia of stress, 379
  3. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.12.001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–172 of 172

Metadata

Authors
Vanman, E. J., Baker, R., & Tobin, S. J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
Corresponding author
Vanman, Eric J.
Venue
The Journal of Social Psychology
Published
2018-04-09
Volume
158
Issue
4
Pages
496-508
ISSN
  • 0022-4545 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-1183
OpenAlex
W2793688098
Cited by
168
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 3
FWCI
49.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Digital Media and Philosophy
Keywords
Facebook, social media withdrawal, social media detox, perceived stress, subjective well-being, life satisfaction, salivary cortisol, social disconnection, social networking sites
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Social Isolation, Stress, Psychological, Social Networking, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review