The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The burden of online friends: The effects of giving up Facebook on stress and well-being
Open accessAbstract
People occasionally choose to cut themselves off from their online social network by taking extended breaks from Facebook. This study investigated whether abstaining from Facebook reduces stress but also reduces subjective well-being because of the resulting social disconnection. Participants (138 active Facebook users) were assigned to either a condition in which they were instructed to give up Facebook for 5 days or continue to use Facebook as normal. Perceived stress and well-being, as well as salivary cortisol, were measured before and after the test period. Relative to those in the Facebook Normal condition, those in the No Facebook condition experienced lower levels of cortisol and life satisfaction. Our results suggest that the typical Facebook user may occasionally find the large amount of social information available to be taxing, and Facebook vacations could ameliorate this stress-at least in the short term.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“while experimental evidence is mixed8,9.”
From Windows of developmental sensitivity to social media (2022) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Such studies are lacking because ensuring participant compliance is challenging [4,49], and those published fail to show consistent results [50,51,52].”
From The Conceptual and Methodological Mayhem of “Screen Time” (2020) · cites this paper as [50]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Global Measure of Perceived Stress
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136404 · Cited by 32,807
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
The satisfaction with life scale
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · Cited by 31,768
Dickerson, S. S., & Kemeny, M. E. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.355 · Cited by 5,881
The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods
Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x09351676 · Cited by 5,774
Review of the Satisfaction With Life Scale.
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.164 · Cited by 3,611
Review of the Satisfaction With Life Scale
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2009) · Social indicators research series · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_5 · Cited by 3,462
A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization
Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D. I., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., & Fowler, J. H. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11421 · Cited by 2,575
Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1992) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/0047-2484(92)90081-j · Cited by 2,542
The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015
Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015) · University of Texas at Austin · doi:10.15781/t25p41 · Cited by 1,674
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Ellison N. B., 2013, Paper presented at the 7th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media
- Kirschbaum C., 2000, Encyclopedia of stress, 379
- 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.12.001 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teenagers, screens and social media: a narrative review of reviews and key studies
Orben, A. (2020) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-019-01825-4 · Cited by 706
Social Media and Well-Being: Pitfalls, Progress, and Next Steps
Kross, E., Verduyn, P., Sheppes, G., Costello, C. K., Jonides, J., & Ybarra, O. (2021) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.10.005 · Cited by 474
The impact of digital technology use on adolescent well-being
Dienlin, T., & Johannes, N. (2020) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2020.22.2/tdienlin · Cited by 393
Windows of developmental sensitivity to social media
Orben, A., Przybylski, A. K., Blakemore, S.-J., & Kievit, R. A. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29296-3 · Cited by 387
Montag, C., Lachmann, B., Herrlich, M., & Zweig, K. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16142612 · Cited by 387
Metadata
- Authors
- Vanman, E. J., Baker, R., & Tobin, S. J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Australian Catholic University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Vanman, Eric J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-04-09
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 496-508
- ISSN
- 0022-4545 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-1183
- OpenAlex
- W2793688098
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 49.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2019-05-14)
- Open access
- green
- eprints.qut.edu.au
- Locations
- The Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
- Social Sciences › Communication › Digital Media and Philosophy
- Keywords
- Facebook, social media withdrawal, social media detox, perceived stress, subjective well-being, life satisfaction, salivary cortisol, social disconnection, social networking sites
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Social Isolation, Stress, Psychological, Social Networking, Social Media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
