Cited by 355Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeological and Geochemical AnalysisGeological formations and processes

The Ediacaran Period: a new addition to the geologic time scale

Open access
Knoll, Andrew H., Walter, Malcolm R., Narbonne, Guy M., Christie‐Blick, Nicholas·2006·Lethaia

Abstract

The International Union of Geological Sciences has approved a new addition to the geologic time scale: the Ediacaran Period. The Ediacaran is the first Proterozoic period to be recognized on the basis of chronostratigraphic criteria and the first internationally ratified, chronostratigraphically defined period of any age to be introduced in more than a century. In accordance with procedures established by the International Commission on Stratigraphy, the base of the Ediacaran Period is defined by a Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) placed at the base of the Nuccaleena Formation cap carbonate directly above glacial diamictites and associated facies at Enorama Creek in the Flinders Ranges of South Australia. Its top is defined by the initial GSSP of the Cambrian Period. The new Ediacaran Period encompasses a distinctive interval of Earth history that is bounded both above and below by equally distinctive intervals. Both chemostratigraphic and biostratigraphic data indicate that the subdivision of the period into two or more series is feasible, and this should be a primary objective of continuing work by the Ediacaran Subcommission of the ICS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00241160500409223

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The genetic fossil record strongly supports the notion that the diversification of metazoans in general, and bilaterian metazoans in particular, occurred during the Ediacaran Period, 635-542 Myr ago.

    “Here we have shown, using a variety of analyses and appropriately testing for biases that may have been introduced by the use of palaeontologically derived maxima, that the genetic fossil record strongly supports the notion that the diversification of metazoans in general, and bilaterian metazoans in particular, occurred during the Ediacaran Period, 635-542 Myr ago (Knoll et al. 2004, 2006).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knoll, A. H., Walter, M. R., Narbonne, G. M., & Christie‐Blick, N.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (US)
Venue
Lethaia
Published
2006-03
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
13-30
ISSN
  • 0024-1164 (ISSN-L)
  • 1502-3931
OpenAlex
W2137519359
Cited by
355
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
FWCI
22.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lethaia (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Geological formations and processes
Keywords
geologic time scale, chronostratigraphy, GSSP, Flinders Ranges, Proterozoic, Cambrian, chemostratigraphy, biostratigraphy, International Commission on Stratigraphy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review