Study Habits and Procrastination: The Role of Academic Self-Efficacy
Open accessAbstract
Inefficient study skills increase the probability that study work is perceived as difficult and aversive, with procrastination as a likely result. As a remedy, more effective study skills and habits may be encouraged. However, research indicates that good study skills and habits may not by themselves be sufficient to remedy problems, as this relationship may be mediated by efficacy beliefs related to academic functioning. We investigated this hypothesis across three student samples (total N = 752). As predicted, structural equation modeling (SEM) indicated that study self-efficacy mediated the study habits—procrastination relation. The mediation effects were medium to large. We conclude that training of, and advice on, study skills and habits should be accompanied by measures that build study self-efficacy.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The increase in self-efficacy may be attributed to the skills-based nature of the intervention, which included regular feedback and strategies designed to enhance mastery.
“The increase in self-efficacy may be attributed to the skills-based nature of the intervention, which included regular feedback and strategies designed to enhance mastery (Svartdal et al., 2022).”
From Group cognitive behavioral therapy for reducing procrastination in college students: a randomized controlled trial (2026) · cites this paper as Svartdal et al., 2022
The General Discussion says skills training should include feedback and mastery experiences to build self-efficacy beliefs. The source does not describe the citing paper’s intervention or establish that its reported increase in self-efficacy was caused by those features. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 71 · Cited by 44
Research works printed but not linked: 52
- Balkis, M. (2011). Academic efficacy as a mediator and moderator variable in the relationship between academic pro- crastination and academic achievement. Egitim Arastirmalari -Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 45, 1- 16. http://acikerisim.pau.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11499/5762
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
- Bartimote-Aufflick, K., Bridgeman, A., Walker, R., Sharma, M., & Smith, L. (2016). The study, evaluation, and improvement of university student self-efficacy. Studies in Higher Education, 41(11), 1918-1942. https://doi. org/10.1080/03075079.2014.999319 · DOI
- Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd Edn). The Guilford Press.
- Brown, T., & Murdolo, Y. (2016). Approaches to study across four year-levels of undergraduate occupational therapy students: Similar or different? British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79(12), 752-761. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0308022616662482 · DOI
- Cerino, E. S. (2014). Relationships between academic motivation, self-efficacy, and academic procrastination. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 19(4), 156-163. https://doi.org/10.24839/2164-8204.JN19.4.156 · DOI
- Diseth, A. (2011). Self-efficacy, goal orientations and learning strategies as mediators between preceding and sub- sequent academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 191-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. lindif.2011.01.003 · DOI
- Ekuni, R., de Souza, B. M. N., Agarwal, P. K., & Pompeia, S. (2020). A conceptual replication of survey research on study strategies in a diverse, non-WEIRD student population. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000191 · DOI
- Ferrari, J. R., Parker, J. T., & Ware, C. B. (1992). Academic procrastination: Personality correlates with Myers-Briggs types, self-efficacy, and academic locus of control. Journal of social Behavior and personality, 7(3), 495-502.
- Foerst, N. M., Klug, J., Jöstl, G., Spiel, C., & Schober, B. (2017). Knowledge vs. Action: Discrepancies in university students' knowledge about and self-reported use of self-regulated learning strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1288. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01288 · DOI
- Goffe, W. L., & Kauper, D. (2014). A survey of principles instructors: Why lecture prevails. The Journal of Economic Education, 45(4), 360-375. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2014.946547 · DOI · Paper page
- Gore, P. A. (2006). Academic self-efficacy as a predictor of college outcomes: Two incremental validity studies. Journal of Career Assessment, 14(1), 92-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072705281367 · DOI
- Gregorich, S. E. (2006). Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework. Medical Care, 44(11 Suppl. 3), S78-S94. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000245454.12228. · DOI
- Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016). The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 17, 63-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
- Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejbrm/ article/view/1224
- Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10. 1080/10705519909540118 · DOI · Paper page
- Huang, C. (2013). Gender differences in academic self-efficacy: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0097-y · DOI · Paper page
- Jairam, D. (2019). First-year seminar focused on study skills: An ill-suited attempt to improve student retention. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2019.1582757 · DOI
- Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1086/376806 https://doi.org/10.1086/376806 · DOI
- Jung, K. R. (2013). The mediational effect of academic self-discipline (ASD) between academic self-efficacy (ASE) and college GPA [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Minnesota. http://hdl.handle.net/11299/157688
- Khan, M. J., & Rasheed, S. (2019). Moderating role of learning strategies between meta-cognitive awareness and study habits among university students. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research: PJPR, 34(Spring 2019), 215-231. https://doi.org/10.33824/PJPR.2019.34.1.12 · DOI
- Klingsieck, K. B., Grund, A., Schmid, S., & Fries, S. (2013). Why students procrastinate: A qualitative approach. Journal of College Student Development, 54(4), 397-412. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2013.0060 · DOI · Paper page
- Kreber, C., Castleden, H., Erfani, N., & Wright, T. (2005). Self-regulated learning about university teaching: An exploratory study. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(1), 75-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251052000305543 · DOI · Paper page
- MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130 · DOI · Paper page
- MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99-128. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pmc/articles/PMC2821115/. https://doi.org/0.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4 https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15327906mbr3901_4 · DOI · Paper page
- Mandap, C. M. (2016). Examining the differences in procrastination tendencies among university students. International Journal of Education and Research, 4(4), 431-436. http://ww.w.ijern.com/journal/2016/April- 2016/35.pdf
- McCloskey, J., & Scielzo, S. A. (2015). Finally!: The development and validation of the academic procrastination scale. Manuscript submitted for publication. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Shannon-Scielzo/publication/273259879_ Finally_The_Development_and_Validation_of_the_Academic_Procrastination_Scale/links/ 54fcfb3d0cf20700c5e9c735/Finally-The-Development-and-Validation-of-the-Academic-Procrastination-Scale.pdf
- Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (1997). Influence of self-efficacy on elementary students' writing. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(6), 353-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1997.10544593 · DOI
- Phan, H. P. (2011). Interrelations between self-efficacy and learning approaches: A developmental approach. Educational Psychology, 31(2), 225-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2010.545050 · DOI
- Phan, H. P. (2013). Theoretical constructs that explain and enhance learning: A longitudinal examination. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(6), 1007-1021. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.806445 · DOI
- Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33 · DOI · Paper page
- Prat-Sala, M., & Redford, P. (2010). The interplay between motivation, self-efficacy, and approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 283-305. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X480563 · DOI
- Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for commu- nicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 93-115. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022658 · DOI · Paper page
- Purdie, N., & Hattie, J. (1999). The relationship between study skills and learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Australian Journal of Education, 43(1), 72-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494419904300106 · DOI
- Pychyl, T. A., Morin, R. W., & Salmon, B. R. (2000). Procrastination and the planning fallacy: An examination of the study habits of university students. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15(5), 135.
- Richardson, J. T. (2010). Perceived academic quality and approaches to studying in higher education: Evidence from danish students of occupational therapy. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 54(2), 189-203. https:// doi.org/10.1080/00313831003637972 · DOI
- Roberts, N., & Thatcher, J. (2009). Conceptualizing and testing formative constructs: Tutorial and annotated example. ACM Sigmis Database: The Database for Advances in Information Systems, 40(3), 9-39. https://doi. org/10.1145/1592401.1592405 · DOI
- Schouwenburg, H. C. (2004). Procrastination in academic settings: General introduction. In H. C. Schouwenburg, C. H. Lay, T. A. Pychyl, & J. R. Ferrari (Eds.), Counseling the procrastinator in academic settings (pp. 3-17). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10808-001 · DOI
- Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. Measures in Health Psychology: A User's Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs, 1(1), 35-37. http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~health/engscal.htm
- Stewart, M., Stott, T., & Nuttall, A. M. (2016). Study goals and procrastination tendencies at different stages of the undergraduate degree. Studies in Higher Education, 41(11), 2028-2043. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015. 1005590 · DOI
- Svartdal, F. (2017). Measuring procrastination: Psychometric properties of the Norwegian versions of the Irrational Procrastination Scale (IPS) and the pure procrastination scale (PPS). Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(1), 18-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2015.1066439 · DOI
- tb00460.x · DOI · Paper page
- Tuckman, B. W. (1991). The development and concurrent validity of the procrastination scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(2), 473-480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164491512022 · DOI · Paper page
- Van Dinther, M., Dochy, F., & Segers, M. (2011). Factors affecting students' self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.10.003 · DOI · Paper page
- Verplanken, B. (2006). Beyond frequency: Habit as mental construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 639- 656. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X49122 · DOI · Paper page
- Weinstein, C. E., Husman, J., & Dierking, D. R. (2000). Self-regulation interventions with a focus on learning strat- egies. In Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 727-747). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/ 50051-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Wernersbach, B. M., Crowley, S. L., Bates, S. C., & Rosenthal, C. (2014). Study skills course impact on academic self- efficacy. Journal of Developmental Education, 14-33. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24614030
- Yockey, R. D. (2016). Validation of the short form of the academic procrastination scale. Psychological Reports, 118 (1), 171-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294115626825 https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294115626825 · DOI
- Zarick, L. M., & Stonebraker, R. (2009). I'll do it tomorrow: The logic of procrastination. College Teaching, 57(4), 211- 215. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550903218687 · DOI
- Zeegers, P. (2004). Student learning in higher education: A path analysis of academic achievement in science. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(1), 35-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436032000168487 · DOI
- Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2 · DOI · Paper page
- Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663-676. https://doi. org/10.3102/00028312029003663 · DOI · Paper page
- Authors
- Svartdal, F., Sæle, R. G., Dahl, T. I., Nemtcan, E., & Gamst-Klaussen, T.
- Affiliations
- UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Svartdal, Frode
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-08-03
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1141-1160
- ISSN
- 0031-3831 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1170
- OpenAlex
- W3199434388
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 4.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
- Keywords
- study habits, procrastination, academic self-efficacy, study skills, mediation, student learning, self-efficacy training
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review