Why Students Procrastinate: A Qualitative Approach
Abstract
In this study we adopted an impartial view on academic procrastination in order to gain new insights for the development of intervention programs. Following a qualitative approach, we thereby explored antecedents of procrastination by attending to the actual voices and experiences of 29 students. Students’ subjective theories were in line with some antecedents that previous research had addressed (lack of motivation or volitional control), but also revealed relatively new aspects of academic procrastination that concern students’ social relatedness and task competence. Considering these findings, we suggest ideas on how to assist students and how to design intervention programs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Qualitative interview studies support the finding that task aversiveness is related to procrastination.
“Results of qualitative interview studies support these findings (Grunschel et al., 2013; Klingsieck et al., 2013; Visser et al., 2018).”
From How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations (2020) · cites this paper as Klingsieck et al., 2013
Qualitative studies show students reported feeling lost and overwhelmed by the task of planning a whole course of studies, a semester, or even an exam phase on their own.
“Overall, students reported feeling lost and overwhelmed by the task of planning a whole course of studies, a semester, or even an exam phase on their own.”
From How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations (2020) · cites this paper as Klingsieck et al., 2013
Working alone is associated with increased procrastination.
“However, working alone is associated with increased procrastination (Klingsieck et al., 2013).”
From How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations (2020) · cites this paper as Klingsieck et al., 2013
Distraction by peers can be a source of academic procrastination.
“Both qualitative (Klingsieck et al., 2013) and quantitative (Chen et al., 2016) evidence support the idea that distraction by peers can be a source of academic procrastination.”
From How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations (2020) · cites this paper as Klingsieck et al., 2013
Peer behavior is taken into account by procrastinating students.
“Indirect support for this notion also comes from Klingsieck et al. (2013) and Nordby et al. (2017), who report that peer behavior is taken into account by procrastinating students.”
From How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations (2020) · cites this paper as Klingsieck et al., 2013
Group work with interdependence between group members may reduce academic procrastination.
“Qualitative evidence suggests that group work with interdependence between group members may reduce academic procrastination (Klingsieck et al., 2013).”
From How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations (2020) · cites this paper as Klingsieck et al., 2013
Cites
Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.7.493 · Cited by 5,478 · see citing works
Steel, P. (2007) · Psychological bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65 · Cited by 3,417 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Apparently, the intention– action gap (Steel, 2007) was as an antecedent to procrastination in these studies.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAcademic procrastination: Frequency and cognitive-behavioral correlates.
Solomon, L. J., & Rothblum, E. D. (1984) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.31.4.503 · Cited by 1,788 · see citing works
At last, my research article on procrastination
Lay, C. H. (1986) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/0092-6566(86)90127-3 · Cited by 1,175 · see citing works
Understanding procrastination from a self-regulated learning perspective.
Wolters, C. A. (2003) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.179 · Cited by 679 · see citing works
A meta-analytically derived nomological network of procrastination.
van Eerde, W. (2003) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00358-6 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Doing the things we do: a grounded theory of academic procrastination.
Schraw, G., Wadkins, T., & Olafson, L. (2007) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.12 · Cited by 597 · see citing works
Affective, cognitive, and behavioral differences between high and low procrastinators.
Rothblum, E. D., Solomon, L. J., & Murakami, J. (1986) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.33.4.387 · Cited by 521 · see citing works
Arousal, avoidant and decisional procrastinators: Do they exist?
Steel, P. (2010) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.025 · Cited by 514 · see citing works
“I'll look after my health, later”: an investigation of procrastination and health
Sirois, F. M., Melia-Gordon, M. L., & Pychyl, T. A. (2003) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00326-4 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
The procrastination of everyday life.
Milgram, N. A., Sroloff, B., & Rosenbaum, M. (1988) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/0092-6566(88)90015-3 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Fries, S., Dietz, F., & Schmid, S. (2008) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.10.001 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Academic procrastination: psychological antecedents revisited
Steel, P., & Klingsieck, K. B. (2016) · Australian Psychologist · doi:10.1111/ap.12173 · Cited by 534 · see citing works
Self-citationProcrastination: When Good Things Don’t Come to Those Who Wait
Klingsieck, K. B. (2013) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000138 · Cited by 483 · see citing works
Self-citationExploring reasons and consequences of academic procrastination: an interview study.
Grunschel, C., Patrzek, J., & Fries, S. (2013) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-012-0143-4 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Self-citationHow Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations
Svartdal, F., Dahl, T. I., Gamst-Klaussen, T., Koppenborg, M., & Klingsieck, K. B. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.540910 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
“…may contribute significantly to this situation, the majority of research efforts to clarify mechanisms involved in procrastination has focused on individual variables related to personality, motivation, affect, and others (for reviews, see van Eerde, 2003; Steel, 2007; Klingsieck, 2013).”
BackgroundSelf-citationPelikan, E. R., Korlat, S., Reiter, J., Holzer, J., Mayerhofer, M., Schober, B., Spiel, C., Hamzallari, O., Uka, A., Chen, J., et al. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0257346 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Emotion regulation difficulties and academic procrastination
Mohammadi Bytamar, J., Saed, O., & Khakpoor, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.524588 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Do procrastination-friendly environments make students delay unnecessarily?
Nordby, K., Klingsieck, K. B., & Svartdal, F. (2017) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-017-9386-x · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Visser, L., Korthagen, F. A. J., & Schoonenboom, J. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00808 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Tisocco, F., & Liporace, M. F. (2023) · Innovative Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10755-022-09622-9 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
From distraction to delay: Unpacking academic procrastination
Fabio, R. A., Ricciardello, M., & Picciotto, G. (2026) · Europe’s Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5964/ejop.19203
“Academic procrastination, defined as the voluntary delay of important tasks despite expecting negative consequences, is a widespread self-regulatory failure among students, often accompanied by feelings of guilt, stress, and reduced well-being (Klingsieck et al., 2013; Sirois & Pychyl, 2016).”
- Authors
- Klingsieck, K. B., Grund, A., Schmid, S., & Fries, S.
- Affiliations
- Paderborn University (DE)
- University of Luxembourg (LU)
- University of Regensburg (DE)
- Bielefeld University (DE)
- Venue
- Journal of College Student Development
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 397-412
- ISSN
- 0897-5264 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-3382
- OpenAlex
- W2045477559
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of college student development (publishedVersion)
- University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion)
- PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
- Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
- Keywords
- academic procrastination, student experience, lack of motivation, volitional control, social relatedness, task competence, university students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review