Cited by 128Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesStudent Stress and CopingGrit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation

Why Students Procrastinate: A Qualitative Approach

Klingsieck, Katrin B., Grund, Axel, Schmid, Sebastian, Fries, Stefan·2013·Journal of College Student Development

Abstract

In this study we adopted an impartial view on academic procrastination in order to gain new insights for the development of intervention programs. Following a qualitative approach, we thereby explored antecedents of procrastination by attending to the actual voices and experiences of 29 students. Students’ subjective theories were in line with some antecedents that previous research had addressed (lack of motivation or volitional control), but also revealed relatively new aspects of academic procrastination that concern students’ social relatedness and task competence. Considering these findings, we suggest ideas on how to assist students and how to design intervention programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/csd.2013.0060

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Qualitative interview studies support the finding that task aversiveness is related to procrastination.

    “Results of qualitative interview studies support these findings (Grunschel et al., 2013; Klingsieck et al., 2013; Visser et al., 2018).”

    From How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations (2020) · cites this paper as Klingsieck et al., 2013

  • Qualitative studies show students reported feeling lost and overwhelmed by the task of planning a whole course of studies, a semester, or even an exam phase on their own.

    “Overall, students reported feeling lost and overwhelmed by the task of planning a whole course of studies, a semester, or even an exam phase on their own.”

    From How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations (2020) · cites this paper as Klingsieck et al., 2013

  • Working alone is associated with increased procrastination.

    “However, working alone is associated with increased procrastination (Klingsieck et al., 2013).”

    From How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations (2020) · cites this paper as Klingsieck et al., 2013

  • Distraction by peers can be a source of academic procrastination.

    “Both qualitative (Klingsieck et al., 2013) and quantitative (Chen et al., 2016) evidence support the idea that distraction by peers can be a source of academic procrastination.”

    From How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations (2020) · cites this paper as Klingsieck et al., 2013

  • Peer behavior is taken into account by procrastinating students.

    “Indirect support for this notion also comes from Klingsieck et al. (2013) and Nordby et al. (2017), who report that peer behavior is taken into account by procrastinating students.”

    From How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations (2020) · cites this paper as Klingsieck et al., 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klingsieck, K. B., Grund, A., Schmid, S., & Fries, S.
Affiliations
  • Paderborn University (DE)
  • University of Luxembourg (LU)
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
Venue
Journal of College Student Development
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2013-07
Volume
54
Issue
4
Pages
397-412
ISSN
  • 0897-5264 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-3382
OpenAlex
W2045477559
Cited by
128
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of college student development (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
  • Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
Keywords
academic procrastination, student experience, lack of motivation, volitional control, social relatedness, task competence, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review