Cited by 214

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Experimental approaches to the interpretation of absorbed organic residues in archaeological ceramics

Evershed, Richard P.·2008·World Archaeology

Abstract

All scientific investigations require experimentation to test hypotheses and support interpretations. Thus, experimental studies are an indispensable aspect of investigations of organic residues from archaeological ceramics. Experimental methods have been applied to provide insights into factors relating to vessels use and burial. Studies relating to vessel use have used replica vessels, ceramic chips and powder to investigate both physical and chemical phenomena relating to organic residue deposition and transformations. Ethnographic vessels are employed to bridge a practical gap, providing insights into the impacts of long-term vessel use that would be impossible to address in laboratory experiments. By combining such studies we have provided important insights into the chemical compositions observed and prompted searches for novel marker compounds that might otherwise have been overlooked. Potsherds impregnated with organic residues provide substrates for investigating the impacts of burial on chemical and stable isotopic compositions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00438240801889373

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence of palmitic and stearic acid together with compounds typically associated with food processing (azelaic acid, C18 vicinal dihydroxy fatty acids, C18 ω-(o-alkylphenyl)alkanoic acids, C31-35 mid-chain ketones) indicates they are not merely background contamination.

    “Although these concentrations are quite low in comparison to food residues from other sites [27] and could possibly be interpreted as background contamination [61], [62], they are detected together with compounds that are typically associated with food processing, e.g. azelaic acid, C18 vicinal dihydroxy fatty acids, C18 ω-(o-alkylphenyl)alkanoic acids and C31–35 mid-chain ketones.”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Aillaud S., 2001, Field and laboratory studies of diagenetic reactions affecting lipid residues absorbed in unglazed archaeological pottery vessels
  2. Bayliss A., 2004, Tools for Constructing Chronologies: Tools for Crossing Disciplinary Boundaries, 25, 10.1007/978-1-4471-0231-1_2 · DOI
  3. Beck C. W., 1989, Archaeological Chemistry, 4, 69
  4. Bland H. A., 1999, Chemical investigations of ancient biomolecules in artefacts and ecofacts from Qasr Ibrim, Egyptian Nubia
  5. 10.1016/j.jas.2006.09.012 · DOI
  6. Charters S., 1996, Chemical analysis of absorbed lipids and laboratory simulation experiments to interpret archaeological pottery vessel contents and use
  7. 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1993.tb01036.x · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1006/jasc.1995.0091 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2004.00147.x · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.0335955100 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Copley M. S., 2004, South African Journal of Science, 100, 279
  12. 10.1039/b500403a · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.jas.2004.08.006 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.jas.2004.07.005 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.jas.2004.07.004 · DOI
  16. Copley M. S., 2005, Antiquity, 79, 895, 10.1017/S0003598X00115029 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.jaap.2003.09.001 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2007.00292.x · DOI
  19. Davídek J., Chemical Changes during Food Processing: Developments in Food Science, Vol. 21
  20. Dudd S. N., 1999, Molecular and isotopic characterisation of animal fats in archaeological pottery
  21. 10.1126/science.282.5393.1478 · DOI
  22. Evershed R. P., 2000, Modern Methods in Art and Archaeology, 177
  23. 10.1039/an9901501339 · DOI
  24. Evershed R. P., 1991, Antiquity, 65, 540, 10.1017/S0003598X00080145 · DOI
  25. Evershed R. P., 1995, Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, 352, 85
  26. 10.1016/0040-4039(95)01844-8 · DOI
  27. Evershed R. P., 2001, Handbook of Archaeological Sciences, 331
  28. 10.1021/ar000200f · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2007.00368.x · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2004.01.111 · DOI
  31. March J., 1977, Advanced Organic Chemistry
  32. Matikainen J., 2003, Tetrahedron Letters, 59, 567, 10.1016/S0040-4020(02)01513-2 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/BF02532680 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/BF02532681 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0021-9673(98)01041-3 · DOI
  36. Mukherjee A. J., 2005, The Zooarchaeology of Fats, Oils, Milk and Dairying, 77
  37. Mukherjee A. J., 2007, Antiquity, 81, 743, 10.1017/S0003598X00095703 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2007.00321.x · DOI
  39. 10.1016/S0165-2370(97)00036-3 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1098/rspb.1998.0536 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Serpico M., 2000, Ancient Egyptian Materials and Technology, 430
  42. Skibo J. M., 1992, Pottery Function: A Use-Alteration Perspective, 10.1007/978-1-4899-1179-7 · DOI
  43. Urem-Kotsou D., 2002, Antiquity, 76, 962, 10.1017/S0003598X00091766 · DOI
  44. Walton T. J., 1990, Methods in Plant Biochemistry, Vol. 4, 105

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Evershed, R. P.
Venue
World Archaeology
Published
2008-03
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
26-47
ISSN
  • 0043-8243
  • 1470-1375
Cited by
214
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review