Cited by 387

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Direct chemical evidence for widespread dairying in prehistoric Britain

Copley, M. S., Berstan, R., Dudd, S. N., Docherty, G., Mukherjee, A. J., Straker, V., Payne, S., Evershed, R. P.·2003·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Domesticated animals formed an important element of farming practices in prehistoric Britain, a fact revealed through the quantity and variety of animal bone typically found at archaeological sites. However, it is not known whether the ruminant animals were raised purely for their tissues (e.g., meat) or alternatively were exploited principally for their milk. Absorbed organic residues from pottery from 14 British prehistoric sites were investigated for evidence of the processing of dairy products. Our ability to detect dairy fats rests on the observation that the δ 13 C values of the C 18:0 fatty acids in ruminant dairy fats are ≈2.3‰ lower than in ruminant adipose fats. This difference can be ascribed to ( i ) the inability of the mammary gland to biosynthesize C 18:0 ; ( ii ) the biohydrogenation of dietary unsaturated fatty acids in the rumen; and ( iii ) differences (i.e., 8.1‰) in the δ 13 C values of the plant dietary fatty acids and carbohydrates. The lipids from a total of 958 archaeological pottery vessels were extracted, and the compound-specific δ 13 C values of preserved fatty acids (C 16:0 and C 18:0 ) were determined via gas chromatography-combustion-isotope ratio mass spectrometry. The results provide direct evidence for the exploitation of domesticated ruminant animals for dairy products at all Neolithic, Bronze Age, and Iron Age settlements in Britain. Most significantly, studies of pottery from a range of key early Neolithic sites confirmed that dairying was a widespread activity in this period and therefore probably well developed when farming was introduced into Britain in the fifth millennium B.C.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0335955100

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. A Sherratt Pattern of the Past: Studies in Honour of David Clark, eds I Hodder, G Isaac, N Hammond (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.), pp. 261–305 (1981).
  2. G Barker Prehistoric Farming in Europe (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1985).
  3. 10.1111/j.1468-0092.1984.tb00113.x · DOI
  4. 10.2307/3642547 · DOI
  5. A J Legge Farming Practice in British Prehistory, ed R Mercer (Edinburgh Univ. Press, Edinburgh), pp. 169–181 (1981).
  6. R P Evershed, C Heron, S Charters, L J Goad New Developments in Archaeological Science, ed A M Pollard (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford), pp. 187–208 (1992).
  7. 10.1007/s001140050417 · DOI
  8. 10.1098/rstb.1999.0357 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0021-9673(98)01041-3 · DOI
  10. P McDonald, R D Edwards, J F D Greenhalgh Anim. Nutr. (Pergamon, Essex, U.K., 1988).
  11. 10.1017/S0022029900016873 · DOI
  12. 10.1017/S0022029900022147 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/0009-3084(73)90036-4 · DOI
  14. 10.1126/science.282.5393.1478 · DOI
  15. 10.1039/an9901501339 · DOI
  16. 10.1039/AN9941900909 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0008-6215(83)88244-5 · DOI
  18. G Docherty, V Jones, R P Evershed Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 18, 730–738 (2991).
  19. J H Moore, W W Christie Progress in Lipid Research, ed W W Christie (Pergamon, Oxford), pp. 227–277 (1981).
  20. F M Byers, G T Schelling The Ruminant Animal: Digestive Physiology and Nutrition, ed D C Church (Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), pp. 298–312 (1988).
  21. De Niro M. J. & Epstein S. (1977) Science 261–263. · DOI
  22. 10.1139/e74-007 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/BF00329760 · DOI
  24. 10.1098/rspb.1993.0081 · DOI
  25. R Mercer, F Healey Hambledon Hill–Post-Excavation Assessment (Edinburgh Archaeological Services, Edinburgh, 1995).
  26. A Whittle, J Pollard, C Grigson The Harmony of Symbols: The Windmill Hill Causewayed Enclosure (Oxbow, Oxford, 1999). · DOI
  27. C Grigson The Harmony of Symbols: The Windmill Hill Causewayed Enclosure, eds A Whittle, J Pollard, C Grigson (Oxbow, Oxford), pp. 164–252 (1999). · DOI
  28. T Allen, K Walsh S Midlands Archaeol 27, 25–35 (1997).
  29. H-P Uerpmann The Walking Larder: Patterns of Domestication, Pastoralism and Predation, ed J Clutton-Brock (Unwin Hyman, London), pp. 91–96 (1989).
  30. 10.1080/00438243.1983.9979887 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/324237a0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Copley, M. S., Berstan, R., Dudd, S. N., Docherty, G., Mukherjee, A. J., Straker, V., Payne, S., & Evershed, R. P.
Affiliations
Organic Geochemistry Unit, Biogeochemistry Research Centre, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TS, United Kingdom; School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1SS, United Kingdom; and English Heritage Centre for Archaeology, Fort Cumberland, Portsmouth PO4 9LD, United Kingdom
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2003-02-06
Volume
100
Issue
4
Pages
1524-1529
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
387
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review