The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measures of Perceived Interactivity: An Exploration of the Role of Direction of Communication, User Control, and Time in Shaping Perceptions of Interactivity
Abstract
Interactivity is an often mentioned but seldom operationalized concept associated with the World Wide Web. Interactivity has been positioned conceptually as a process, a function, and a perception, but most operational definitions have focused on the process or function. This study develops scales to operationalize the perception-based approach to interactivity, because consumer perceptions are central to advertising research. Three overlapping constructs that are central to interactivity are explored: direction of communication, user control, and time. A multistage method is used to identify and refine measures of perceived interactivity (MPI). The 18 items included in the MPI offer researchers a tool for measuring a consumer perception central to advertising on the Web.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549
Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence
Steuer, J. (1992) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x · Cited by 5,459
Hamlet on the holodeck: the future of narrative in cyberspace
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1342 · Cited by 2,780
MOON, Y., & NASS, C. (1996) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365096023006002 · Cited by 291
Cited by
Labrecque, L. I. (2014) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.003 · Cited by 971
Can a Retail Web Site Be Social?
Wang, L. C., Baker, J., Wagner, J. A., & Wakefield, K. (2007) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.71.3.143 · Cited by 672
Why do people use food delivery apps (FDA)? A uses and gratification theory perspective
Ray, A., Dhir, A., Bala, P. K., & Kaur, P. (2019) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.05.025 · Cited by 613
Personalization versus Customization: The Importance of Agency, Privacy, and Power Usage
Sundar, S. S., & Marathe, S. S. (2010) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01377.x · Cited by 588
Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernández-Ortega, B., & Sese, F. J. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.019 · Cited by 568
Factors affecting YouTube influencer marketing credibility: a heuristic-systematic model
Xiao, M., Wang, R., & Chan-Olmsted, S. (2018) · Journal of Media Business Studies · doi:10.1080/16522354.2018.1501146 · Cited by 497
What makes followers loyal? The role of influencer interactivity in building influencer brand equity
Jun, S., & Yi, J. (2020) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/jpbm-02-2019-2280 · Cited by 340
Camilleri, M. A. (2024) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123247 · Cited by 261
Mütterlein, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2018.174 · Cited by 238
Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alias, N., Othman, M. S., Marin, V. I., & Tur, G. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.010 · Cited by 225
Consumer trust in the online retail context: Exploring the antecedents and consequences
Chen, J., & Dibb, S. (2010) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20334 · Cited by 227
System design effects on online impulse buying.
Ning Shen, K., & Khalifa, M. (2012) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/10662241211250962 · Cited by 226
Examining the antecedents and consequences of mobile app engagement
Kim, S., & Baek, T. H. (2018) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.10.008 · Cited by 203
Advertising benefits from ethical Artificial Intelligence algorithmic purchase decision pathways
Rodgers, W., & Nguyen, T. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05048-7 · Cited by 137
A content analysis of direct-to-consumer (DTC) prescription drug Web sites
Macias, W., & Lewis, L. S. (2003) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2003.10639147 · Cited by 98
Adopters and non-adopters of Internet banking: A segmentation study
Patsiotis, A. G., Hughes, T., & Webber, D. J. (2012) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/02652321211195686 · Cited by 85
Lew, Z., Walther, J. B., Pang, A., & Shin, W. (2018) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmy009 · Cited by 86
Rezwana, J., & Maher, M. L. (2022) · Creativity and Cognition · doi:10.1145/3527927.3532789 · Cited by 85
Bellur, S., & Sundar, S. S. (2017) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/hcre.12094 · Cited by 69
Macias, W., & McMillan, S. (2008) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410230701805174 · Cited by 64
Self-citationAge and gender differences in photo tagging gratifications.
Dhir, A., & Torsheim, T. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.044 · Cited by 63
Uses and gratifications of educational apps: A study during COVID-19 pandemic
Menon, D. (2022) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100076 · Cited by 59
Using authentic 3D product visualisation for an electrical online retailer
Algharabat, R., & Dennis, C. (2010) · Journal of Customer Behaviour · doi:10.1362/147539210x511326 · Cited by 49
Effects of Communication Directionality and AI Agent Differences in Human-AI Interaction
Ashktorab, Z., Dugan, C., Johnson, J., Pan, Q., Zhang, W., Kumaravel, S., & Campbell, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445256 · Cited by 50
Shiu, J. Y., Liao, S. T., & Tzeng, S.-Y. (2023) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-023-01731-w · Cited by 48
An Experimental Analysis of the Effectiveness of Multi-Screen Advertising
Hoeck, L., & Spann, M. (2020) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2020.01.002 · Cited by 26
OPENING THE GATES: Interactive and multimedia elements of newspaper websites in Latin America
Bachmann, I., & Harlow, S. (2012) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2011.622165 · Cited by 24
Damaj, A., & Nofal, R. (2026) · Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.3390/jtaer21040112 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- McMillan, S. J., & Hwang, J.-S.
- Venue
- Journal of Advertising
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 29-42
- ISSN
- 0091-3367 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7805
- OpenAlex
- W1968755157
- Cited by
- 1,082
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 50.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.