Cited by 323Attachment and Relationship DynamicsMarriage and Sexual RelationshipsSexual function and dysfunction studies

Couple communication, emotional and sexual intimacy, and relationship satisfaction

Yoo, Hana, Bartle-Haring, Suzanne, Day, Randal D., Gangamma, Rashmi·2014·Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy

Abstract

Emotional and sexual aspects of intimacy in romantic relationships are important correlates of couples' relationship satisfaction. However, few studies have examined the effect of emotional and sexual aspects of intimacy on relationship satisfaction within the context of the interpersonal relationship processes. In addition, the association between emotional and sexual aspects of intimacy remains unclear. With a sample of 335 married couples from the Flourishing Families Project, the authors examined the associations between couple communication, emotional intimacy, sexual satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction, using the couple as the unit of analysis. The results of path analysis suggested that sexual satisfaction significantly predicted emotional intimacy for husbands and wives, while emotional intimacy did not appear to have a significant influence on sexual satisfaction. Further, mediation associations were suggested within as well as between spouses. Within spouses (for each spouse), emotional intimacy and sexual satisfaction mediated the association between spouses' appraisal of their partners' communication and their own relationship satisfaction. Gender differences were revealed in terms of how a spouse's perception of sexual satisfaction is associated with his or her partner's relationship satisfaction. In this study, although wives' relationship satisfaction was not associated with their husbands' sexual satisfaction, husbands tended to report high levels of relationship satisfaction when their wives reported greater sexual satisfaction. Findings suggest that both components of intimacy--emotional and sexual--should be comprehensively addressed in research and clinical work with couples.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0092623x.2012.751072

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yoo, H., Bartle-Haring, S., Day, R. D., & Gangamma, R.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Brigham Young University (US)
  • Syracuse University (US)
Corresponding author
Yoo, Hana
Venue
Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy
Published
2013-10-10
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
275-293
ISSN
  • 0092-623X (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0715
OpenAlex
W1968684271
Cited by
323
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3
FWCI
11.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
couple communication, emotional intimacy, sexual satisfaction, relationship satisfaction, married couples, mediation, gender differences, sexual intimacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Communication, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Marriage, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior, Sex Distribution, Spouses, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review