Cited by 79Attachment and Relationship DynamicsSexual function and dysfunction studiesMarriage and Sexual Relationships

The associations of intimacy and sexuality in daily life: Temporal dynamics and gender effects within romantic relationships

Open access
van Lankveld, Jacques, Jacobs, Nele, Thewissen, Viviane, Dewitte, Marieke, Verboon, Peter·2018·Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

Abstract

The experience of emotional intimacy is assumed to play a particularly large role in maintaining sexual desire and partnered sexual activity in romantic relationships of longer duration. It is unclear whether the effect of intimacy on sexual contact between partners is direct or indirect, via its impact on sexual desire. Baumeister and Bratslavsky suggested that a certain increment in emotional intimacy causes a greater increment in sexual desire in men than in women. In the present study, we aimed to test the mediating role of sexual desire between perceived intimacy and sexual partner interaction and the gender effect as hypothesized by Baumeister and Bratslavsky. Experience sampling methodology in the participant’s natural environment was used. At 10 quasi-random moments per day, during 7 consecutive days, 134 participants reported their feelings of emotional intimacy, sexual desire, and sexual activity. The direct effect of intimacy on sexual partner interaction was not significant, but an indirect effect via sexual desire was observed. The strength of the association between intimacy and sexual desire diminished over time, from the strongest effect when intimacy, sexual desire, and sexual activity were measured simultaneously to a very small, but significant effect at an average time lag of 3 hr. At still larger time gaps, no effects were found. Men reported a higher average level of sexual desire than women, but the strength of the link between (increases in) intimacy and sexual desire was not different between the genders. The present findings suggest that in both male and female partners in romantic, long-term relationships, higher levels of intimacy are associated with higher sexual desire, which is, in turn, associated with higher odds for partnered sexual activity to occur. The temporal association of increasing intimacy and subsequent sexual desire appears not to be different in women and men.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0265407517743076

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Basson R. (2000). The female sexual response: A different model. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 26, 51– 65. doi:10.1080/009262300278641 10693116 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Basson R. (2002). Women’s sexual desire—Disordered or misunderstood? Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 28, 17– 28. doi:10.1080/00926230252851168 11898699 · DOI
  3. Baumeister R. F. Bratslavsky E (1999). Passion, intimacy, and time: Passionate love as a function of change in intimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 49– 67. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0301_3 15647147 · DOI
  4. Birnbaum G. E. Cohen O. Wertheimer V. (2007). Is it all about intimacy? Age, menopausal status, and women’s sexuality. Personal Relationships, 14, 167– 185. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00147.x · DOI
  5. Bodenmann G. Pihet S. Kayser K. (2006). The relationship between dyadic coping and marital quality: A 2-year longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 485– 493. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.20.3.485 16938007 · DOI
  6. Bolger N. Davis A. Rafaeli E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579– 616. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030 12499517 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Call V. Sprecher S. Schwartz P. (1995). The incidence and frequency of marital sex in a national sample. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 639– 652. doi:10.2307/353919 · DOI
  8. Carver C. S. Scheier M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19– 35. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.19 · DOI · Paper page
  9. de Vries M. W. (1992). The experience of psychopathology: Investigating mental disorders in their natural settings. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Dewitte M. van Lankveld J. Vandenberghe S. Loeys T. (2015). Sex in its daily relational context. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12, 2436– 2450. doi:10.1111/jsm.13050 26608879 · DOI
  11. Ein-Dor T. Hirschberger G. (2012). Sexual healing: Daily diary evidence that sex relieves stress for men and women in satisfying relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 126– 139. doi:10.1177/0265407511431185 · DOI
  12. Gillmore M. R. Gaylord J. Hartway J. Hoppe M. J. Morrison D. M. Leigh B. C. Rainey D. T. (2001). Daily data collection of sexual and other health-related behaviors. Journal of Sex Research, 38, 35– 42. doi:10.1080/00224490109552068 · DOI
  13. Green A. S. Rafaeli E. Bolger N. Shrout P. E. Reis H. T. (2006). Paper or plastic? Data equivalence in paper and electronic diaries. Psychological Methods, 11, 87– 105. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.87 16594769 · DOI
  14. Hatfield E. Rapson R. L. (1993). Historical and cross-cultural perspectives on passionate love and sexual desire. Annual Review of Sex Research, 4, 67– 97.
  15. Hinchliff S. Gott M. (2004). Perceptions of well-being in sexual ill health: What role does age play? Journal of Health Psychology, 9, 649– 660. doi:10.1177/1359105304045361 15310419 · DOI
  16. Hook M. K. Gerstein L. H. Detterich L. Gridley B. (2003). How close are we? Measuring intimacy and examining gender differences. Journal of Counseling & Development, 81, 462– 472. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2003.tb00273.x · DOI
  17. Impett E. A. Finkel E. J. Strachman A. Gable S. L. (2008). Maintaining sexual desire in intimate relationships: The importance of approach goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 808– 823. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.808 18444740 · DOI
  18. Impett E. A. Muise A. Peragine D. (2014). Sexuality in the context of relationships In Tolman D. L. Diamond L. M. Bauermeister J. A. George W. H. Pfaus J. G. Ward L. M. (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology, Vol. 1: Person-based approaches (pp. 269– 315). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association doi:10.1037/14193-010 · DOI
  19. Jacobs N. Nicolson N. A. Derom C. Delespaul P. van Os J. Myin-Germeys I. (2005). Electronic monitoring of salivary cortisol sampling compliance in daily life. Life Sciences, 76, 2431– 2443. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2004.10.045 15763075 · DOI
  20. Kenny D. A. Korchmaros J. D. Bolger N. (2003). Lower level mediation in multilevel models. Psychological Methods, 8, 115– 128. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.8.2.115 12924810 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Levine S. B. (1991). Psychological intimacy. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 17, 259– 267. doi: 10.1080/00926239108404350 1815092 · DOI
  22. McCabe M. P. Goldhammer D. L. (2012). Demographic and psychological factors related to sexual desire among heterosexual women in a relationship. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 78– 87. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.569975 21534027 · DOI
  23. Muise A. Impett E. A. Desmarais S. (2013). Getting it on versus getting it over with: Sexual motivation, desire, and satisfaction in intimate bonds. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1320– 1332. doi:10.1177/0146167213490963 23812928 · DOI
  24. Myin-Germeys I. Oorschot M. Collip D. Lataster J. Delespaul P. van Os J. (2009). Experience sampling research in psychopathology: Opening the black box of daily life. Psychological Medicine, 39, 1533– 1547. doi:10.1017/S0033291708004947 19215626 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Preacher K. J. Zyphur M. J. Zhang Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15, 209– 233. doi:10.1037/a0020141 20822249 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Reis H. T. Patrick B. C. (1996). Attachment and intimacy: Component processes In Higgins E. T. Kruglanski A. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 523– 563). New York, NY: Guilford.
  27. Reis H. T. Shaver P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process In Duck S. (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 367– 389). Chichester, England: Wiley.
  28. Reynolds B. M. Robles T. F. Repetti R. L. (2016). Measurement reactivity and fatigue effects in daily diary research with families. Developmental Psychology, 52, 442– 456. doi:10.1037/dev0000081 26689757 · DOI
  29. Rubin H. Campbell L. (2012). Day-to-day changes in intimacy predict heightened relationship passion, sexual occurrence, and sexual satisfaction: A dyadic diary analysis. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 224– 231. doi:10.1177/1948550611416520 · DOI
  30. Simpson J. A. Gangestad S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870– 883. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.870 1865325 · DOI
  31. Stephenson K. R. Meston C. M. (2010). When are sexual difficulties distressing for women? The selective protective value of intimate relationships. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7, 3683– 3694. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01958.x 20701676 PMC2975393 · DOI
  32. Štulhofer A. Carvalheira A. A. Træen B. (2013). Is responsive sexual desire for partnered sex problematic among men? Insights from a two-country study. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 28, 246– 258. doi:10.1080/14681994.2012.756137 · DOI
  33. Werts C. E. Linn R. L. Jöreskog K. G. (1974). Intraclass reliability estimates: Testing structural assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 25– 33. doi:10.1177/001316447403400104 · DOI
  34. Zeileis A. Kleiber C. Jackman S. (2008). Regression models for count data in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 27, 1– 25. doi:10.18637/jss.v027.i08 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Lankveld, J., Jacobs, N., Thewissen, V., Dewitte, M., & Verboon, P.
Affiliations
  • Open Universiteit of the Netherlands, the Netherlands
  • Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Venue
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
Published
2018-03-23
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
557-576
ISSN
  • 0265-4075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-3608
OpenAlex
W2790101707
Cited by
79
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4
FWCI
6.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Social and Personal Relationships (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
Keywords
emotional intimacy, sexual desire, sexual activity, romantic relationships, long-term relationships, gender differences, mediation, temporal dynamics, everyday life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review