Cited by 2Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesAncient and Medieval Archaeology StudiesArchaeological and Geological Studies

Monumental and Long-Lasting or Temporary and Performative? How did Neolithic Rondels Function? Radiocarbon Dating and Bayesian Chronological Modeling of the Rondel at Nowe Objezierze (Northwestern Poland)

Czerniak, Lech, Bayliss, Alex, Goslar, Tomasz, Badura, Monika, Budilová, Kristýna, Lisá, Lenka, Marciniak, Arkadiusz, Matuszewska, Agnieszka +2 more·2024·Journal of Field Archaeology

Abstract

Radiocarbon dating and Bayesian chronology modeling have provided precise dating for the rondel at Nowe Objezierze (northwestern Poland). This monument, located in the farthest reaches of the “Danubian World,” sheds new light on rondels and the way they functioned. A total of 44 radiocarbon dates are now available for the site, and modeling of these (taking into account depositional processes and the results of palynological analysis) has identified plausible scenarios for its construction and use. The rondel was built around 4800 cal b.c. and operated for about three centuries. The cyclical digging and filling of ditches and the sequential establishment of new ones characterized the historical development of the site. The long duration of use of the site served as a base to analyze the potential construction technology and to propose the reconstruction of the appearance of the rondel.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00934690.2024.2306433

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Czerniak, L., Bayliss, A., Goslar, T., Badura, M., Budilová, K., Lisá, L., Marciniak, A., Matuszewska, A., Pędziszewska, A., & Święty-Musznicka, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Gdańsk (PL)
  • Historic England (GB)
  • Poznań Radiocarbon Laboratory, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
  • University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice (CZ)
  • Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
  • Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (PL)
  • University of Szczecin (PL)
  • University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland
Corresponding author
Czerniak, Lech
Venue
Journal of Field Archaeology
Published
2024-02-07
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
335-355
ISSN
  • 0093-4690 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-4582
OpenAlex
W4391616282
Cited by
2
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Field Archaeology (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Centre Poland (2017/27/B/HS3/02925)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
Keywords
radiocarbon dating, Bayesian chronology, site chronology, ditches, palynology, construction technology, Neolithic settlement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review