Cited by 192Science Education and PedagogyEducational Strategies and EpistemologiesInnovative Teaching Methods

The Effect of Refuting Misconceptions in the Introductory Psychology Class

Kowalski, Patricia, Taylor, Annette Kujawski·2009·Teaching of Psychology

Abstract

Students often come into the introductory psychology course with many misconceptions and leave with most of them intact. Borrowing from other disciplines, we set out to determine whether refutational lecture and text are effective in dispelling student misconceptions. These approaches first activate a misconception and then immediately counter it with correct information. We tested students' knowledge of 45 common misconceptions and then taught the course with lecture and readings of a refutational or standard format or did not cover the information at all. Students showed significant changes in their beliefs when we used refutational approaches, suggesting refutational pedagogies are best for changing students' misconceptions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00986280902959986

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The refutational approach was more effective than the Alka-Seltzer approach at changing false beliefs.

    “In a direct comparison of strategies, Kowalski and Taylor (2009) demonstrated that the refutational approach was more effective than the Alka-Seltzer approach at changing false beliefs.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kowalski, P., & Taylor, A. K.
Affiliations
University of San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Kowalski, Patricia
Venue
Teaching of Psychology
Published
2009-06-24
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
153-159
ISSN
  • 0098-6283 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-8023
OpenAlex
W2097093880
Cited by
192
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
24.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Teaching of Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
Keywords
misconceptions, introductory psychology, belief revision, science education, misconceptions about psychology, lecture format, reading textbooks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review