The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pupils' views on inclusion: moderate learning difficulties and bullying in mainstream and special schools
Abstract
This study examined the views of 101 boys and girls aged 10–11 and 13–14 with statements of special educational needs for moderate learning difficulties. Questions centred on their experiences of school, teaching and learning in mainstream and special schools. The study is set in the context of the international move towards more inclusion of children with disabilities into mainstream schools and the greater importance attached to the child's voice in decision‐making in education. Most children expressed positive evaluations of their schools and the teaching they received, while a significant minority expressed mixed views. A significant proportion in the mainstream preferred learning support in withdrawal settings. While the majority in both settings preferred their current school, a significant minority in special school preferred to be in a mainstream setting. A notable emergent theme from the study was the high incidence of ‘bullying’ that was experienced. Though experienced in both settings, those in special schools experienced far more ‘bullying’ by children from other mainstream schools and from peers and outsiders in their neighbourhood. These findings are discussed in terms of the tensions or dilemmas about difference that were experienced and their implications for the move towards greater inclusion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
What Can Be Done About School Bullying?: Linking Research to Educational Practice
Swearer, S. M., Espelage, D. L., Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2010) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x09357622 · Cited by 672
Humphrey, N., & Lewis, S. (2008) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361307085267 · Cited by 587
Update on bullying at school: Science forgotten?
Stassen Berger, K. (2007) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2006.08.002 · Cited by 578
Relationships between school climate, bullying and delinquent behaviours
Aldridge, J. M., McChesney, K., & Afari, E. (2018) · Learning Environments Research · doi:10.1007/s10984-017-9249-6 · Cited by 124
Francis, B., Connolly, P., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Mazenod, A., Pepper, D., Sloan, S., Taylor, B., Tereshchenko, A., & Travers, M.-C. (2017) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2017.09.001 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Norwich, B., & Kelly, N.
- Venue
- British Educational Research Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-65
- ISSN
- 0141-1926 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-3518
- OpenAlex
- W2085566129
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pupils' views on inclusion: moderate learning difficulties and bullying in mainstream and special schools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01411920310001629965
- The paper
- Norwich, B., & Kelly, N. (2004). Pupils' views on inclusion: moderate learning difficulties and bullying in mainstream and special schools. British Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920310001629965
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.