Cited by 131Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyInnovations in Medical EducationEmpathy and Medical Education

Spirituality and health in the curricula of medical schools in Brazil

Open access
Lucchetti, Giancarlo, Lucchetti, Alessandra Lamas Granero, Espinha, Daniele Corcioli Mendes, de Oliveira, Leandro Romani, Leite, José Roberto, Koenig, Harold G·2012·BMC Medical Education

Abstract

BACKGROUND: According to recent surveys, 59% of British medical schools and 90% of US medical schools have courses or content on spirituality and health (S/H). There is little research, however, on the teaching of S/H in medical schools in other countries, such as those in Latin America, Asia, Australia and Africa. The present study seeks to investigate the current status of teaching on S/H in Brazilian medical schools. METHODS: All medical schools in Brazil (private and public) were selected for evaluation, were contacted by email and phone, and were administered a questionnaire. The questionnaire, sent by e-mail, asked medical school directors/deans about any S/H courses that were taught, details about those courses, S/H lectures or seminars, importance of teaching this subject for medical school directors, and medical schools characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 86 out of 180 (47.7%) medical schools responded. Results indicated that 10.4% of Brazilian Medical Schools have a dedicated S/H courses and 40.5% have courses or content on spirituality and health. Only two medical schools have S/H courses that involve hands-on training and three schools have S/H courses that teach how to conduct a spiritual history. The majority of medical directors (54%) believe that S/H is important to teach in their schools. CONCLUSION: Few Brazilian medical schools have courses dealing specifically with S/H and less than half provide some form of teaching on the subject. Unfortunately, there is no standard curriculum on S/H. Nevertheless, the majority of medical directors believe this issue is an important subject that should be taught.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6920-12-78

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physicians' own R/S beliefs often influence medical decisions they make and affect the type of care they offer to patients, including decisions about use of pain medications, abortion, vaccinations, and contraception.

    “Fourth, physicians' own R/S beliefs often influence medical decisions they make and affect the type of care they offer to patients, including decisions about use of pain medications [588], abortion [589], vaccinations [590], and contraception [591].”

    From Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications (2012) · cites this paper as [588]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says spiritual or religious beliefs can affect medical decisions, and that physicians’ own spirituality can affect their ability to provide compassionate care. It does not address the use of pain medications, the specific decision to which this citation is attached. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mariotti L Lucchetti G Dantas M Banin V Fumelli F Padula N Spirituality and medicine: views and opinions of teachers in a Brazilian medical school Medical teacher 2011 33 339 340 21591292

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lucchetti, G., Lucchetti, A. L. G., Espinha, D. C. M., de Oliveira, L. R., Leite, J. R., & Koenig, H. G.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
  • King Abdulaziz University (SA)
Corresponding author
Lucchetti, Giancarlo
Venue
BMC Medical Education
Published
2012-08-18
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
78-78
ISSN
1472-6920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057959433
Cited by
129
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medical Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
Keywords
spirituality and health, medical education, medical curriculum, curriculum evaluation, spiritual history taking, hands-on training, Brazil
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Brazil, Clinical Competence, Cross-Sectional Studies, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Health, Humans, Physician Executives, Physician-Patient Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Religion and Medicine, Schools, Medical, Students, Medical, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review