Cited by 183Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyInnovations in Medical EducationEmpathy and Medical Education

Spirituality in Medical School Curricula: Findings from a National Survey

Koenig, Harold G., Hooten, Elizabeth G., Lindsay-Calkins, Erin, Meador, Keith G.·2010·The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine

Abstract

Objective: No systematic information exists on what U.S. medical schools are teaching on spirituality and health or on the attitudes of faculty toward inclusion of this subject in the medical curriculum. We systematically surveyed U.S. medical school deans and assessed both attitudes about and the extent to which spirituality is addressed in medical school curricula. Methods: The responses to a questionnaire were solicited from deans representing 122 U.S. medical schools accredited by the Liaison Committee for Medical Education. Completed surveys were received from 85% ( n = 104), with 94% ( n = 115) responding to the primary question. Outcomes were proportion of medical schools with curricular content on spirituality and attitudes of deans toward such material. Results: Ninety percent (range 84%–90%) of medical schools have courses or content on spirituality and health (S&H), 73% with content in required courses addressing other topics and 7% with a required course dedicated to S&H. Although over 90% indicate that patients emphasize spirituality in their coping and health care, only 39% say that including S&H is important. When asked if their institution needs more S&H curricular content, 43% indicated they did; however, even if funding and training support were available, only 25% would open additional curricular time. National policy statements, established competencies, or methods to evaluate student competencies in S&H were generally considered unimportant. Conclusions: Most U.S. medical schools have curricular content on S&H, although this varies greatly in scope. Despite acknowledging its importance to patients, the majority of deans are uncertain about including spirituality and do not think more content is needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2190/pm.40.4.c

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • R/S beliefs influence medical decisions among those with serious medical illness and especially among those with advanced cancer or HIV/AIDS.

    “Studies have shown that R/S beliefs influence medical decisions among those with serious medical illness [584, 585] and especially among those with advanced cancer [586] or HIV/AIDs [587].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koenig, H. G., Hooten, E. G., Lindsay-Calkins, E., & Meador, K. G.
Affiliations
Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Koenig, Harold G.
Venue
The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine
Published
2010-12
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
391-398
ISSN
  • 0033-278X (ISSN-L)
  • 0091-2174
  • 1541-3527
OpenAlex
W2019815431
Cited by
183
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
Keywords
spirituality and health, medical curriculum, medical education, medical school deans, faculty attitudes, curriculum content, patient coping, curriculum expansion, competency-based education
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Curriculum, Data Collection, Education, Medical, Faculty, Medical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, United States, Mind-Body Relations, Metaphysical, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review