The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Constructing Efficient Stated Choice Experimental Designs
Abstract
Stated choice (SC) experiments are often used in transportation studies for estimating and forecasting behaviour of travellers, road authorities, etc. This kind of experiment relies on underlying experimental designs. Whilst orthogonal designs are mainstream for practitioners, many researchers now realize that so‐called efficient designs are able to produce more efficient data in the sense that more reliable parameter estimates can be achieved with an equal or lower sample size. This paper describes several processes for generating SC experiments and is intended to give an overview of the current state‐of‐the‐art. Different methods are described.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The screening alternatives described by the attributes and levels in Table 1 were allocated into choice sets using a multinomial logit (mnl) d-efficient design, assuming no prior information about the likely magnitude or direction of coefficients (zero priors) [29,30].”
From Consumer preferences for teledermoscopy screening to detect melanoma early (2016) · cites this paper as [30]
In the citing paper
“Hence, a D-efficient design will outperform an orthogonal design, and (given reliable priors), a Dp-efficient design will outperform a Dz-efficient design [21].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“It is noteworthy that when the parameter priors are different from zero, the efficient design generated produces smaller prediction errors than orthogonal designs [21,49,50].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“The most widely used efficiency measure is the D-error, which may be easily estimated using various software packages, such as Ngene, and refers to the efficiency of the experimental design in extracting information from respondents [21].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cites
Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior
McFadden, D. L. (1972) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 14,203
Cragg, J. G., & Zarembka, P. (1975) · Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique · doi:10.2307/134075 · Cited by 8,477
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805271 · Cited by 7,784
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., Swait́, J., & Adamowicz, W. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753831 · Cited by 7,008
Statistics for experimenters. An introduction to design, data analysis, and model building.
Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., & Hunter, J. S. (1978) · Cited by 4,021
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753930 · Cited by 3,973
Cochran, W. G., & Cox, G. M. (1957) · Cited by 1,729
Journal of transport economics and policy
(1969) · Transportation Research · doi:10.1016/0041-1647(69)90163-4 · Cited by 1,578
The Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Choice Designs
Huber, J. C., & Zwerina, K. (1996) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379603300305 · Cited by 1,023
(1955) · The Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1955.tb38334.x · Cited by 891
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Bliemer, M. C. J. and Rose, J. M. Designing stated choice experiments: state‐of‐the‐art. Paper presented at the 11th international conference on Travel Behaviour Research. August2006, Kyoto, Japan.
- Bliemer M. C. J., Transportation Research Part B
- Cochran W. G., 1957, Experimental Designs
- Fowkes A. S., 2000, Stated Preference Modelling Techniques, 37
- Rose, J. M. and Bliemer, M. C. J. Designing efficient data for stated choice: accounting for socio‐demographic and contextual effects in designing stated choice experiments. Paper presented at the 11th international conference on Travel Behaviour Research. August2006, Kyoto, Japan.
- Rose J. M., 2008, Handbook of Transport Modelling, Ch 8, 151
- Watson S. M., 2000, Stated Preference Modelling Techniques, 91
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 795
Estimating bicycle demand in an aggressive environment
Gutiérrez, M., Cantillo, V., Arellana, J., & Ortúzar, J. D. D. (2020) · International Journal of Sustainable Transportation · doi:10.1080/15568318.2020.1734886 · Cited by 50
Verhetsel, A., Kessels, R., Zijlstra, T., & Bavel, M. V. (2016) · Journal of Housing and the Built Environment · doi:10.1007/s10901-016-9522-5 · Cited by 49
Haghani, M., Sarvi, M., Shahhoseini, Z., & Boltes, M. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166908 · Cited by 49
Fifer, S. J., Ho, K.-A., Lybrand, S., Axford, L. J., & Roach, S. (2020) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-020-07018-6 · Cited by 51
Bliemer, M. C. J., Rose, J. M., & Chorus, C. G. (2017) · Transportation Research Part B Methodological · doi:10.1016/j.trb.2017.05.005 · Cited by 48
Self-citationModelling parking behaviour considering users heterogeneities
Martín, G. A. S., Ibeas, Á., Alonso, B., & dell’Olio, L. (2018) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.01.014 · Cited by 48
Preferences for sustainable mobility in natural areas: The case of Teide National Park
González, R. M., Román, C., & Ortúzar, J. D. D. (2019) · Journal of Transport Geography · doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.03.002 · Cited by 48
Lifecycle Stages and Residential Location Choice in the Presence of Latent Preference Heterogeneity
Smith, B., & Olaru, D. (2013) · Environment and Planning A Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a45490 · Cited by 48
Tinelli, M., Ozolins, M., Bath-Hextall, F. J., & Williams, H. C. (2012) · BMC Dermatology · doi:10.1186/1471-5945-12-19 · Cited by 47
Potoglou, D., Palacios, J.-F., & Feijóo, C. (2015) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2015.12.002 · Cited by 47
Chen, W. Y., Liekens, I., & Broekx, S. (2017) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-017-0885-5 · Cited by 48
Do Looks Matter? A Case Study on Extensive Green Roofs Using Discrete Choice Experiments
Vanstockem, J., Vranken, L., Bleys, B., Somers, B., & Hermy, M. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10020309 · Cited by 47
Tao, X., & Zhu, L. (2020) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2020.06.002 · Cited by 51
Rose, J. M., & Masiero, L. (2010) · European journal of transport and infrastructure research · doi:10.18757/ejtir.2010.10.4.2898 · Cited by 49
Self-citationWalsh, S., O'Shea, E., Pierse, T., Kennelly, B., Keogh, F., & Doherty, E. (2020) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112675 · Cited by 47
Schaak, H., & Mußhoff, O. (2019) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104371 · Cited by 45
Zhou, H., Norman, R., Xia, J. C., Hughes, B., Kelobonye, K., Nikolova, G., & Falkmer, T. (2020) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2020.04.020 · Cited by 48
Hwang, J., Li, W., Stough, L. M., Lee, C., & Turnbull, K. F. (2020) · International Journal of Sustainable Transportation · doi:10.1080/15568318.2020.1833115 · Cited by 46
Shippers’ willingness to delegate modal control in freight transportation
Khakdaman, M., Rezaei, J., & Tavasszy, L. A. (2020) · Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2020.102027 · Cited by 45
Thorhauge, M., Cherchi, E., & Rich, J. (2016) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2016.02.006 · Cited by 45
Asymmetric preference in hotel room choice and implications on revenue management
Masiero, L., Pan, B., & Heo, C. Y. (2016) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.03.009 · Cited by 50
In-store or online grocery shopping before and during the COVID-19 pandemic
Meister, A., Winkler, C., Schmid, B., & Axhausen, K. W. (2022) · Travel Behaviour and Society · doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2022.08.010 · Cited by 47
Riccardo Scarpa, A., Thiene, M., & Hensher, D. A. (2011) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2010wr010148 · Cited by 45
Beef Credence Attributes: Implications of Substitution Effects on Consumers’ WTP
Viegas, I., Nunes, L. C., Madureira, L., Fontes, M. A., & Santos, J. L. (2014) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12067 · Cited by 44
The Value of a Statistical Life in a Road Safety Context — A Review of the Current Literature
Bahamonde-Birke, F. J., Kunert, U., & Link, H. (2015) · Transport Reviews · doi:10.1080/01441647.2015.1025454 · Cited by 47
Discrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review
Vass, C., Gray, E., & Payne, K. (2015) · International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy · doi:10.1007/s11096-015-0221-1 · Cited by 44
Chen, N., Masiero, L., & Hsu, C. H. C. (2018) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287518794331 · Cited by 44
Design of Digital Agricultural Extension Tools: Perspectives from Extension Agents in Nigeria
Oyinbo, O., Chamberlin, J., & Maertens, M. (2020) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12371 · Cited by 55
Danne, M., Sauthoff, S., & Mußhoff, O. (2021) · Energy Sustainability and Society · doi:10.1186/s13705-021-00291-8 · Cited by 44
The origin–destination airport choice for all-cargo aircraft operations in Europe
Kupfer, F., Kessels, R., Goos, P., de Voorde, E. E. V., & Verhetsel, A. (2016) · Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2015.11.013 · Cited by 43
Modelling choice when price is a cue for quality: a case study with Chinese consumers
Palma, D., Ortúzar, J. D. D., Rizzi, L. I., Guevara, C. Á., Casaubon, G., & Ma, H. (2016) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2016.06.002 · Cited by 43
Discrete choice experiments: An overview on constructing D-optimal and near-optimal choice sets
Alamri, A. S., Georgiou, S., & Stylianou, S. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18256 · Cited by 42
Jiménez, R. C., Garcia-Martinez, A., & de Cáceres, A. M. (2017) · European Transport Research Review · doi:10.1007/s12544-017-0260-x · Cited by 42
Vass, C., & Payne, K. (2017) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-017-0518-0 · Cited by 42
Caputo, V. (2020) · Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics · doi:10.1111/1467-8489.12393 · Cited by 42
Behavioural Influences on the Environmental Impact of Collection/Delivery Points
Collins, A. T. (2015) · Greening of industry networks studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17181-4_2 · Cited by 42
The Allure of the Illegal: Choice Modeling of Rhino Horn Demand in Vietnam
Hanley, N. D., Sheremet, O., Bozzola, M., & MacMillan, D. C. (2017) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/conl.12417 · Cited by 41
Demand for environmentally friendly vehicles: A review and new evidence
Cordera, R., dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, Á., & Ortúzar, J. D. D. (2018) · International Journal of Sustainable Transportation · doi:10.1080/15568318.2018.1459969 · Cited by 52
Fifer, S. J., Rose, J. M., Hamrosi, K. K., & Swain, D. (2018) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3484-0 · Cited by 41
Self-citationThe Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review
Nouwens, S. P. H., Marceta, S. M., Bui, M., van Dijk, D. M. A. H., Groothuis‐Oudshoorn, C. G. M., Veldwijk, J., van Til, J. A., & de Bekker-Grob, E. W. (2025) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y · Cited by 41
Faccioli, M., Font, A. R., & Figuerola, C. M. T. (2014) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-014-0407-7 · Cited by 40
Thiene, M., Riccardo Scarpa, A., & Louviere, J. J. (2014) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-014-9838-0 · Cited by 40
Song, H., Kim, M., & Park, C. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12062182 · Cited by 44
Exploring the role of transportation demand management policies’ interactions
Habibian, M., & Kermanshah, M. (2011) · Scientia Iranica · doi:10.1016/j.scient.2011.09.005 · Cited by 39
Flynn, T. N., Bilger, M., Malhotra, C., & Finkelstein, E. A. (2015) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-015-0338-z · Cited by 39
Valuation of housing and neighbourhood attributes for city centre location: A case study in Santiago
Torres, I., Greene, M., & Ortúzar, J. D. D. (2012) · Habitat International · doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.10.007 · Cited by 39
Feo-Valero, M., Menéndez, L. G., & Salazar, S. D. S. (2014) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-014-9566-x · Cited by 37
Stathopoulos, A., & Hess, S. (2012) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2012.08.005 · Cited by 40
Contu, D., Strazzera, E., & Mourato, S. (2016) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.008 · Cited by 38
Mouter, N., van Cranenburgh, S., & van Wee, B. (2017) · Journal of Transport Geography · doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.03.011 · Cited by 38
Rid, W., Haider, W., Ryffel, A. N., & Beardmore, B. (2017) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.10.019 · Cited by 38
Traveller preferences for free-floating carsharing vehicle allocation mechanisms
Wu, C., Vine, S. L., Sivakumar, A., & Polak, J. W. (2019) · Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2019.02.019 · Cited by 37
Newell, L. W., & Swallow, S. K. (2012) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.008 · Cited by 38
Receivers’ willingness-to-adopt novel urban goods distribution practices
dell’Olio, L., Moura, J. L., Ibeas, Á., Cordera, R., & Holguín‐Veras, J. (2016) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2016.10.026 · Cited by 44
The Preferences of Shared Micro-Mobility Users in Urban Areas
Jaber, A., Hamadneh, J., & Csonka, B. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3297083 · Cited by 37
Li, W., & Kamargianni, M. (2019) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-019-10010-0 · Cited by 37
Demand and supply of agricultural ES: towards benefit-based policy
Tienhaara, A., Haltia, E., Pouta, E., Arovuori, K., Grammatikopoulou, I., Miettinen, A., Koikkalainen, K., Ahtiainen, H., & Artell, J. V. (2019) · European Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/erae/jbz044 · Cited by 40
Farmer preferences for reforestation contracts in Brazil's Atlantic Forest
Richards, R. C., Petrie, R., Christ, B., Ditt, E. H., & Kennedy, C. J. (2020) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102235 · Cited by 36
Modeling Commuter Preferences for the Proposed Bus Rapid Transit in Dar-es-Salaam
Nkurunziza, A., Zuidgeest, M. H. P., Brussel, M. J. G., & van Maarseveen, M. F. A. M. (2012) · Journal of Public Transportation · doi:10.5038/2375-0901.15.2.5 · Cited by 36
Arellana, J., Pérez, L. A. G., Estrada, J., & Cantillo, V. (2020) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2020.100251 · Cited by 35
Curtale, R., Sarman, I., & Evler, J. (2021) · Tourism Planning & Development · doi:10.1080/21568316.2021.2001034 · Cited by 34
Kotu, B. H., Oyinbo, O., Hoeschle‐Zeledon, I., Nurudeen, A. R., Kizito, F., & Boyubie, B. (2021) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105789 · Cited by 40
Torquati, B., Tempesta, T., Vecchiato, D., & Venanzi, S. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10082795 · Cited by 34
Curtin, P., & Papworth, S. (2020) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/conl.12723 · Cited by 34
Coupling transport and electricity: How can vehicle-to-grid boost the attractiveness of carsharing?
Gschwendtner, C., & Krauss, K. (2022) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2022.103261 · Cited by 42
Weighted assessment of barriers to walking in small cities: A Brazilian case
Ruiz-Padillo, A., Oestreich, L., Torres, T. B., Rhoden, P. S., Larrañaga, A. M., & Cybis, H. B. B. (2022) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2022.103392 · Cited by 34
Dynamic consumer preferences for electric vehicles in China: A longitudinal approach
Qian, L., Huang, Y., Tyfield, D., & Soopramanien, D. (2023) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2023.103797 · Cited by 35
Urban Air Mobility demand forecasting: modeling evidence from the case study of Milan (Italy)
Coppola, P., Fabiis, F. D., & Silvestri, F. (2025) · European Transport Research Review · doi:10.1186/s12544-024-00700-x · Cited by 31
Araghi, Y., Kroesen, M., Molin, E. J. E., & van Wee, B. (2016) · International Journal of Sustainable Transportation · doi:10.1080/15568318.2016.1149645 · Cited by 33
Stated preference methods and their applicability to environmental use and non-use valuations
McFadden, D. L. (2017) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781786434692.00012 · Cited by 33
Patient and physician preferences for atopic dermatitis injection treatments in Japan
Okubo, Y., Ho, K.-A., Fifer, S. J., Fujita, H., Oki, Y., & Taguchi, Y. (2019) · Journal of Dermatological Treatment · doi:10.1080/09546634.2019.1623860 · Cited by 35
The influence of individuals in forming collective household preferences for water quality
Rungie, C., Riccardo Scarpa, A., & Thiene, M. (2014) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2014.04.005 · Cited by 32
Notaro, S., Grilli, G., & Paletto, A. (2018) · Landscape Research · doi:10.1080/01426397.2018.1513129 · Cited by 38
Mao, B.-Q., Ao, C.-L., Wang, J., Sun, B.-S., & Xu, L.-S. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120052 · Cited by 30
Modeling the Effects of Pro Bicycle Infrastructure and Policies Toward Sustainable Urban Mobility
dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, Á., Bordagaray, M. E., & Ortúzar, J. D. D. (2013) · Journal of Urban Planning and Development · doi:10.1061/(asce)up.1943-5444.0000190 · Cited by 32
Biondi, B., van der Lans, I. A., Mazzocchi, M., Fischer, A. R. H., van Trijp, J. C. M., & Camanzi, L. (2018) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.12.008 · Cited by 32
Drone delivery and the value of customer privacy: A discrete choice experiment with U.S. consumers
Berke, A., Ding, G., Chin, C., Gopalakrishnan, K., Larson, K., Balakrishnan, H., & Li, M. Z. (2023) · Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2023.104391 · Cited by 31
Rashedi, Z., Mahmoud, M., Hasnine, M. S., & Habib, K. N. (2017) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2017.08.008 · Cited by 31
Hypothetical bias and decision-rule effect in modelling discrete directional choices
Haghani, M., & Sarvi, M. (2018) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2018.06.012 · Cited by 31
Crabbe, M., & Vandebroek, M. L. (2012) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/s1755-5345(13)70046-0 · Cited by 31
Liu, J., Jian, S., Wu, C., & Dixit, V. V. (2024) · Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2024.104603 · Cited by 32
Gallego, G., Dew, A., Lincoln, M., Bundy, A. C., Chedid, R. J., Bulkeley, K., Brentnall, J., & Veitch, C. (2015) · Human Resources for Health · doi:10.1186/s12960-015-0047-x · Cited by 30
Benning, T. M., Dellaert, B. G. C., Severens, J. L., & Dirksen, C. D. (2014) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2014.04.007 · Cited by 29
Modelling air carrier choices with a Segment Specific Cross Nested Logit model
Drabas, T., & Wu, C. (2013) · Journal of Air Transport Management · doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2013.04.004 · Cited by 30
Lagarde, M., Erens, B., & Mays, N. (2014) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.10.008 · Cited by 30
Context-aware stated preferences with smartphone-based travel surveys
Danaf, M., Atasoy, B., Azevedo, C. L., Ding‐Mastera, J., Abou-Zeid, M., Cox, N., Zhao, F., & Ben-Akiva, M. E. (2019) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2019.03.001 · Cited by 30
Analysing the preferences of prospective students for higher education institution attributes
Walsh, S., Flannery, D. J., & Cullinan, J. (2017) · Education Economics · doi:10.1080/09645292.2017.1335693 · Cited by 29
Song, H., Park, C., & Kim, M. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17197100 · Cited by 29
A stated preference model to value reductions in community severance caused by roads
Anciães, P. R., Jones, P., & Metcalfe, P. J. (2018) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.01.007 · Cited by 29
Hoefman, R., van Exel, J. N. A., & Brouwer, W. B. F. (2018) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-018-0724-4 · Cited by 30
Liu, J., Wu, C., Jian, S., Dixit, V. V., & Rashidi, T. H. (2023) · Travel Behaviour and Society · doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100604 · Cited by 28
Zhou, H., Xia, J. C., Norman, R., Hughes, B., Nikolova, G., Kelobonye, K., Du, K., & Falkmer, T. (2019) · Journal of Air Transport Management · doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.101682 · Cited by 30
Are multiple labels on food products beneficial or simply ignored?
Drugova, T., Curtis, K. R., & Akhundjanov, S. B. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie · doi:10.1111/cjag.12259 · Cited by 28
Paffarini, C., Torquati, B., Tempesta, T., Venanzi, S., & Vecchiato, D. (2021) · Agricultural and Food Economics · doi:10.1186/s40100-021-00200-9 · Cited by 28
Public preferences for marine plastic litter management across Europe
Khedr, S., Katrin Rehdanz, A., Brouwer, R., van Beukering, P. J. H., Dijkstra, H., Duijndam, S., & Okoli, I. C. (2022) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107609 · Cited by 29
Sea urchin: From plague to market opportunity
Grisolía, J. M., López, F., & Ortúzar, J. D. D. (2012) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.01.004 · Cited by 28
Assessing the potential acceptability of road pricing in Santiago
Ortúzar, J. D. D., Bascuñán, R., Rizzi, L. I., & Salata, A. (2021) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2020.12.007 · Cited by 27
Demand for taxi services: new elasticity evidence
Rose, J. M., & Hensher, D. A. (2013) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-013-9482-5 · Cited by 27
Self-citationBayesian D-Optimal Choice Designs for Mixtures
Ruseckaite, A., Goos, P., & Fok, D. (2016) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) · doi:10.1111/rssc.12174 · Cited by 27
Spinks, J., Chaboyer, W. P., Bucknall, T. K., Tobiano, G., & Whitty, J. A. (2015) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008941 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Rose, J. M., & Bliemer, M. C. J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Delft University of Technology (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Rose, John M.
- Venue
- Transport Reviews
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 587-617
- ISSN
- 0144-1647 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5327
- OpenAlex
- W2093584567
- Cited by
- 797
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 87 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 32.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transport Reviews (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Keywords
- stated choice experiment, orthogonal experimental design, estimator efficiency, sample size reduction, travel behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
