The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Constructing Efficient Stated Choice Experimental Designs
Abstract
Stated choice (SC) experiments are often used in transportation studies for estimating and forecasting behaviour of travellers, road authorities, etc. This kind of experiment relies on underlying experimental designs. Whilst orthogonal designs are mainstream for practitioners, many researchers now realize that so‐called efficient designs are able to produce more efficient data in the sense that more reliable parameter estimates can be achieved with an equal or lower sample size. This paper describes several processes for generating SC experiments and is intended to give an overview of the current state‐of‐the‐art. Different methods are described.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The screening alternatives described by the attributes and levels in Table 1 were allocated into choice sets using a multinomial logit (mnl) d-efficient design, assuming no prior information about the likely magnitude or direction of coefficients (zero priors) [29,30].”
From Consumer preferences for teledermoscopy screening to detect melanoma early (2016) · cites this paper as [30]
In the citing paper
“Hence, a D-efficient design will outperform an orthogonal design, and (given reliable priors), a Dp-efficient design will outperform a Dz-efficient design [21].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“It is noteworthy that when the parameter priors are different from zero, the efficient design generated produces smaller prediction errors than orthogonal designs [21,49,50].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“The most widely used efficiency measure is the D-error, which may be easily estimated using various software packages, such as Ngene, and refers to the efficiency of the experimental design in extracting information from respondents [21].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cites
Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior
McFadden, D. L. (1972) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 14,203
Cragg, J. G., & Zarembka, P. (1975) · Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique · doi:10.2307/134075 · Cited by 8,477
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805271 · Cited by 7,784
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., Swait́, J., & Adamowicz, W. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753831 · Cited by 7,008
Statistics for experimenters. An introduction to design, data analysis, and model building.
Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., & Hunter, J. S. (1978) · Cited by 4,021
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753930 · Cited by 3,973
Cochran, W. G., & Cox, G. M. (1957) · Cited by 1,729
Journal of transport economics and policy
(1969) · Transportation Research · doi:10.1016/0041-1647(69)90163-4 · Cited by 1,578
The Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Choice Designs
Huber, J. C., & Zwerina, K. (1996) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379603300305 · Cited by 1,023
(1955) · The Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1955.tb38334.x · Cited by 891
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Bliemer, M. C. J. and Rose, J. M. Designing stated choice experiments: state‐of‐the‐art. Paper presented at the 11th international conference on Travel Behaviour Research. August2006, Kyoto, Japan.
- Bliemer M. C. J., Transportation Research Part B
- Cochran W. G., 1957, Experimental Designs
- Fowkes A. S., 2000, Stated Preference Modelling Techniques, 37
- Rose, J. M. and Bliemer, M. C. J. Designing efficient data for stated choice: accounting for socio‐demographic and contextual effects in designing stated choice experiments. Paper presented at the 11th international conference on Travel Behaviour Research. August2006, Kyoto, Japan.
- Rose J. M., 2008, Handbook of Transport Modelling, Ch 8, 151
- Watson S. M., 2000, Stated Preference Modelling Techniques, 91
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 795
Yin, Y., Zhao, Y. P., Wang, H., & Ye, J. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127231 · Cited by 16
Pereira, C. C. D. A., Torres, T. S., Luz, P. M., Hoagland, B., de Farias, A. H. T., Brito, J. D. U., Lacerda, M., da Silva, D. A. R., Benedetti, M., Pimenta, M. C., et al. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049011 · Cited by 16
Shi, Y., Li, C., Zhao, M., & Ni, Q. (2023) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-023-01850-9 · Cited by 16
Rose, J. M., & Hensher, D. A. (2013) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-013-9494-1 · Cited by 16
Self-citationA Combined GPS/Stated Choice Experiment to Estimate Values of Crash-Risk Reduction
Fifer, S. J., Greaves, S. P., Rose, J. M., & Ellison, R. B. (2011) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/s1755-5345(13)70018-6 · Cited by 16
Self-citationPreferences for centralised emergency medical services: discrete choice experiment
Bhattarai, N., McMeekin, P. J., Price, C., & Vale, L. D. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030966 · Cited by 16
Reithmayer, C., Danne, M., & Mußhoff, O. (2020) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.092 · Cited by 16
Deka, D., & Carnegie, J. A. (2021) · Journal of Transport Geography · doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.102965 · Cited by 16
Harold, J., Bertsch, V., & Fell, H. G. (2021) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105454 · Cited by 17
de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Bergstra, A. D., Bliemer, M. C. J., Trijssenaar-Buhre, I. J. M., & Burdorf, A. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142507 · Cited by 14
Self-citationModelling consumers' heterogeneous preferences: a case study with Chilean wine consumers
Palma, D., Ortúzar, J. D. D., Rizzi, L. I., & Casaubon, G. (2017) · Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research · doi:10.1111/ajgw.12297 · Cited by 20
Evaluating residents' preferences for remediation technologies: A choice experiment approach
Huynh, E. K., Araña, J. E., & Prior, J. (2018) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.125 · Cited by 15
Yao, L., Deng, J., Johnston, R. J., Khan, I., & Zhao, M. (2018) · Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie · doi:10.1111/cjag.12189 · Cited by 15
An experimental analysis of German farmers’ decisions to buy or rent farmland
Buchholz, M., Danne, M., & Mußhoff, O. (2022) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106218 · Cited by 20
The Willingness to Pay for Residential PV Plants in Italy: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Bragolusi, P., & D’Alpaos, C. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su131910544 · Cited by 17
Ma, B., Teo, C., & Wong, Y. D. (2022) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2022.2160434 · Cited by 15
González, R. M., Román, C., Amador, F. J., Rizzi, L. I., Ortúzar, J. D. D., Espino, R., Martı́n, J. C., & Cherchi, E. (2016) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-016-9736-0 · Cited by 15
Fifer, S. J., Puig, A., Sequeira, V., Acar, M., Ng, C. H., Blanchard, M., Cabrera, A., Freemantle, J., & Grunfeld, J. A. (2021) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s311699 · Cited by 14
Protection or Peril of Following the Crowd in a Pandemic-Concurrent Flood Evacuation
Borowski, E. C., & Stathopoulos, A. (2022) · Natural Hazards Review · doi:10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000577 · Cited by 14
The preferences of transport mode of certain travelers in the age of autonomous vehicle
Hamadneh, J., & Esztergár‐Kiss, D. (2023) · Journal of Urban Mobility · doi:10.1016/j.urbmob.2023.100054 · Cited by 14
Tran, H., Cunningham, K. M. W., Yelverton, V., Osworth, D., & Hardie, S. (2023) · NASSP Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01926365231198858 · Cited by 14
Public residential charging of electric vehicles: An exploration of UK user preferences
Budnitz, H., Meelen, T., & Schwanen, T. (2024) · European transport studies. · doi:10.1016/j.ets.2024.100004 · Cited by 14
Botha, W., Donnolley, N. R., Shanahan, M., Norman, R. J., & Chambers, G. M. (2018) · Journal of Medical Economics · doi:10.1080/13696998.2018.1549055 · Cited by 15
de Sá, A. L. D., & Pitombo, C. (2021) · Case Studies on Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2021.07.020 · Cited by 10
Modeling transaction costs in household adoption of landscape conservation practices
Johnston, R. J., Ndebele, T., & Newburn, D. A. (2022) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/ajae.12319 · Cited by 14
An integrated algorithm for the optimal design of stated choice experiments with partial profiles
Cuervo, D. P., Kessels, R., Goos, P., & Sörensen, K. (2016) · Transportation Research Part B Methodological · doi:10.1016/j.trb.2016.08.010 · Cited by 14
A mixture-amount stated preference study on the mobility budget
Zijlstra, T., Goos, P., & Verhetsel, A. (2019) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2019.06.009 · Cited by 14
Gwara, S., Wale, E. Z., Lundhede, T., Jourdain, D., & Odindo, A. O. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135570 · Cited by 14
Ma, B., Wong, Y. D., Teo, C., & Sun, S. (2024) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104027 · Cited by 13
Urban Air Mobility Passengers’ Profiling: Evidence from Milan Airports, Italy
Coppola, P., Fabiis, F. D., & Silvestri, F. (2024) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.1177/03611981241287537 · Cited by 13
Tourists vs. residents: Nested logit analysis of mode choices for environmental sustainability
Zhou, H., Qiao, J., Shi, K., Sun, Q. C., Yao, Z., & Norman, R. (2024) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2024.104521 · Cited by 14
What hinders car owners’ participation in private car sharing? Insights from a business perspective
Li, M., & Feng, T. (2024) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104160 · Cited by 13
Wortley, S., Tong, A., Lancsar, E., Salkeld, G. P., & Howard, K. (2015) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-015-0176-0 · Cited by 13
Applying price and time differentiation to modeling cabin choice in high-speed rail
Yang, C.-W., & Chang, C. (2010) · Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2010.07.003 · Cited by 13
Domínguez‐Torreiro, M. (2014) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.01.006 · Cited by 13
Martín, G. A. S., Alonso, B., Cordera, R., & dell’Olio, L. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11133528 · Cited by 13
Grauman, Å., Johansson, J. V., Falahee, M., & Veldwijk, J. (2022) · Preventive Medicine Reports · doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101683 · Cited by 15
Consumer Preferences for Car sharing: Evidence from a Mobility Mode Choice Experiment in Beijing
Qian, L., Pang, Z., & Soopramanien, D. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132505 · Cited by 13
Who has the right to travel during peak hours? On congestion pricing and ‘desirable’ travellers
Vanoutrive, T., & Zijlstra, T. (2017) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.12.020 · Cited by 13
Individual preferences on the balancing of good and harm of cardiovascular disease screening
Hansen, T. B., Lindholt, J. S., Diederichsen, A. C. P., Bliemer, M. C. J., Lambrechtsen, J., Steffensen, F. H., & Søgaard, R. (2019) · Heart · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314103 · Cited by 13
Self-citationMolin, E. J. E. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-8894-9_6 · Cited by 13
Urban mobility under armed conflict: shifts in mode preferences and public transport fare behaviors
Rossolov, A., Potaman, N., Левченко, О. С., & Susilo, Y. O. (2025) · European Transport Research Review · doi:10.1186/s12544-025-00714-z · Cited by 12
Shippers’ willingness to use flexible transportation services
Khakdaman, M., Rezaei, J., & Tavasszy, L. A. (2022) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2022.03.031 · Cited by 12
Casier, C., & Witlox, F. (2022) · European journal of transport and infrastructure research · doi:10.18757/ejtir.2022.22.1.5971 · Cited by 12
Liu, J., Wen, X. L., & Jian, S. (2024) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.05.018 · Cited by 12
Automated vehicles and the urban parking paradigm: Environmental implications and Citizen preference
Garus, A., Rodríguez, A., Mourtzouchou, A., dell’Olio, L., Oreña, B. A., & Ciuffo, B. (2024) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2024.104437 · Cited by 12
Exploring the Spatial Heterogeneity of Individual Preferences for Ambient Heating Systems
Franceschinis, C., Riccardo Scarpa, A., Thiene, M., Rose, J. M., Moretto, M., & Cavalli, R. (2016) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en9060407 · Cited by 12
Self-citationModelling student preferences for the design of campus counselling services
Walsh, S., Cullinan, J., Flannery, D. J., & Kennelly, B. (2020) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2020.1744124 · Cited by 12
A Mire of Discount Rates: Delaying Conservation Payment Schedules in a Choice Experiment
Grammatikopoulou, I., Artell, J. V., Hjerppe, T., & Pouta, E. (2020) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-020-00511-3 · Cited by 12
Understanding maritime transport route choice among Irish exporters: A latent class approach
Vega, A., Feo-Valero, M., & Espino, R. (2021) · Research in Transportation Economics · doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2020.101025 · Cited by 12
Espinosa, M., Rodríguez‐Entrena, M., & Salazar‐Ordóñez, M. (2021) · Economic Analysis and Policy · doi:10.1016/j.eap.2021.04.012 · Cited by 13
Bruni, C., Heidenreich, S., Duenas, A., Hoffmann‐Vold, A., Gabrielli, A., Allanore, Y., Chatelus, E., Distler, J. H. W., HACHULLA, E., Hsu, V. M., et al. (2022) · Rheumatology · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keac126 · Cited by 13
Study of exit choice behaviour in metro station using partial immersive virtual reality
Mandal, T., Rao, K. R., & Tiwari, G. (2022) · IATSS Research · doi:10.1016/j.iatssr.2022.02.002 · Cited by 12
Fifer, S. J., Ordman, R., Briggs, L., & Cowley, A. (2022) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm12060879 · Cited by 12
Batarce, M. A., Muñoz, J. C., Ortúzar, J. D. D., Raveau, S., Mojica, C., & Ríos, R. A. (2015) · Cited by 12
Gallego, G., Dew, A., Lincoln, M., Bundy, A. C., Bulkeley, K., Brentnall, J., & Veitch, C. (2018) · Journal of Intellectual Disability Research · doi:10.1111/jir.12469 · Cited by 12
Addressing the Importance of Service Attributes in Railways
Sañudo, R., Echániz, E., Alonso, B., & Cordera, R. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11123411 · Cited by 12
Jayalath, M. M., Perera, H. N., Seuring, S. A., & Thibbotuwawa, A. (2024) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.2757 · Cited by 11
Analysis of the departure time choices of metro passengers during peak hours
Cheng, Q., Deng, W., & Raza, M. A. (2020) · IET Intelligent Transport Systems · doi:10.1049/iet-its.2019.0442 · Cited by 11
Choosing a Mode in Bangkok: Room for Shared Mobility?
Ayaragarnchanakul, E., Creutzig, F., Javaid, A., & Puttanapong, N. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14159127 · Cited by 11
Tait, P. R., Saunders, C. M., Dalziel, P. C., Rutherford, P., Driver, T., & Guenther, M. (2023) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2023.2176460 · Cited by 11
Raghunandan, R., Howard, K., Ilomäki, J., Hilmer, S. N., Gnjidic, D., & Bell, J. S. (2023) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afad153 · Cited by 11
Heterogeneity and attribute non-attendance in preferences for peatland conservation
Grammatikopoulou, I., Pouta, E., & Artell, J. V. (2019) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2019.04.001 · Cited by 11
Seong, J., de Souza, S. V., Athnos, A., & Peterson, H. C. (2024) · Agribusiness · doi:10.1002/agr.21931 · Cited by 11
Dario, C., Molina, R., & Kelly, D. L. (2024) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106217 · Cited by 10
Do consumers want reconditioned electric vehicle batteries? – A discrete choice experiment
Huster, S., Rosenberg, S., Hufnagel, S., Rudi, A., & Schultmann, F. (2024) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2024.05.027 · Cited by 11
Cai, Y., Qiu, R. T. R., & Wen, L. (2024) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2024.104976 · Cited by 10
Fifer, S. J., Godsell, J., Opat, S., Hamad, N., Lasica, M., Forsyth, C. J., Morand, L., Smeaton, E., Winton, S., Puig, A., et al. (2024) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-024-12589-9 · Cited by 11
Gender dynamics in electric bike-sharing: Insights on usage and fare structures
Rodríguez, A., Delgado-Lindeman, M., Sipone, S., & dell’Olio, L. (2025) · Research in Transportation Economics · doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2025.101561 · Cited by 10
Paffarini, C., Torquati, B., & Cecchini, L. (2025) · Agricultural and Food Economics · doi:10.1186/s40100-025-00363-9 · Cited by 10
Tienhaara, A., Ahtiainen, H., & Pouta, E. (2021) · Ecosystems and People · doi:10.1080/26395916.2021.1890641 · Cited by 10
Preferences for roundabout attributes among US bicyclists: A discrete choice experiment
Poudel, N., & Singleton, P. A. (2021) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2021.11.023 · Cited by 10
Rodríguez, A., dell’Olio, L., Moura, J. L., Alonso, B., & Cordera, R. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15118618 · Cited by 10
Fifer, S. J., Kularatne, T., Tan, M., Drummond, F., & Rule, J. (2023) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s405288 · Cited by 11
Gärtner, F. R., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Stiggelbout, A. M., Rijnders, M. E. B., Freeman, L. M., Middeldorp, J. M., Bloemenkamp, K. W. M., de Miranda, E., & Marle, M. E. V. D. A. (2015) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2015.07.005 · Cited by 10
Determinants for sun-and-beach self-catering accommodation selection
Martı́n, J. C., Román, C., & Mendoza, C. (2018) · Tourism Economics · doi:10.1177/1354816618758731 · Cited by 10
Fifer, S. J., Kerr, A. M., Parken, C., Hamrosi, K. K., & Eid, S. (2020) · Haemophilia · doi:10.1111/hae.14037 · Cited by 10
Eshun‐Wilson, I., Akama, E., Adhiambo, H. F., Kwena, Z., Oketch, B., Obatsa, S., Iguna, S., Lewis-Kulzer, J., Nyanga, J., Nyandieka, E., et al. (2022) · Journal of the International AIDS Society · doi:10.1002/jia2.25979 · Cited by 10
Harmful Algal Blooms and Toxic Air: The Economic Value of Improved Forecasts
Moeltner, K., Fanara, T., Foroutan, H., Hanlon, R., Lovko, V., Ross, S. D., & Schmale, D. G. (2022) · Marine Resource Economics · doi:10.1086/722598 · Cited by 10
How information leads consumers to select specialty foods when tasting is not an option
Streletskaya, N. A., Maruyama, S., Queisser, S., Cole, S., Stelick, A. N., & Lim, J. (2022) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104769 · Cited by 10
Individual preferences towards nuclear energy: the transient residency effect
Contu, D., Mourato, S., & Kaya, Ö. (2020) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2019.1707766 · Cited by 10
Selim, S. M., Senanayake, S. J., McPhail, S., Carter, H. E., Naicker, S., & Kularatna, S. (2024) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-024-00692-9 · Cited by 11
What Determines Civil Servants’ Error Response? Evidence From a Conjoint Experiment
Fischer, C., & Weißmüller, K. S. (2024) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/02750740241267941 · Cited by 9
Cai, Z., Mao, B., Ao, C., & Liu, B. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123078 · Cited by 9
Hewage, S. A., Senanayake, S. J., Brain, D., Allen, M. J., McPhail, S. M., Parsonage, W. A., Walters, T. E., & Kularatna, S. (2025) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/58556 · Cited by 13
How scary is the risk of automation? Evidence from a large-scale survey experiment
Cattaneo, M. A., Gschwendt, C., & Wolter, S. C. (2025) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107034 · Cited by 8
Public acceptance of urban air mobility: A study on factors influencing adoption
Sunitiyoso, Y., Belgiawan, P. F., Susilo, Y. O., Rizki, M., Wirayat, M. Y. F., & Ramadhan, M. (2025) · Sustainable Futures · doi:10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100980 · Cited by 9
Trembach, B., Dmitriiev, O., Кулагін, К. К., Balenko, O., Maliuha, V., & Neduzha, L. (2026) · Eng—Advances in Engineering · doi:10.3390/eng7010023 · Cited by 9
Timmermans, H. J. P., & Molin, E. J. E. (2009) · Transport Reviews · doi:10.1080/01441640902827532 · Cited by 9
Subjective valuation of tangible and intangible heritage neighbourhood attributes
Bonet, L. E., Greene, M., & Ortúzar, J. D. D. (2020) · Habitat International · doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102249 · Cited by 10
Raghunandan, R., Howard, K., Marra, C. A., Tordoff, J. M., & Smith, A. J. (2020) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.1007/s40258-020-00615-3 · Cited by 11
Guerrero-Barbosa, T. E., Guevara, C. Á., Cherchi, E., & Ortúzar, J. D. D. (2022) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2021.100342 · Cited by 9
Tyllianakis, E. (2022) · Journal for Nature Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2022.126174 · Cited by 9
Makriyannis, C., Johnston, R. J., & Whelchel, A. W. (2018) · Agricultural and Resource Economics Review · doi:10.1017/age.2017.27 · Cited by 9
Delayed Antibiotic Prescription by General Practitioners in the UK: A Stated-Choice Study
Morrell, L., Buchanan, J. P., Roope, L. S. J., Pouwels, K. B., Butler, C., Hayhoe, B. W. J., Moore, M. V., Tonkin-Crine, S. K., McLeod, M. C., Robotham, J. V., et al. (2020) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics9090608 · Cited by 9
Aizaki, H., Furuya, J., Sakurai, T., & Mar, S. S. (2021) · Paddy and Water Environment · doi:10.1007/s10333-020-00838-z · Cited by 12
Citizens' preferences for the conservation of agricultural genetic resources
Pouta, E., Tienhaara, A., & Ahtiainen, H. (2014) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2014.00440 · Cited by 9
Kessels, R., Bradley, J., & Goos, P. (2012) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 9
Choice modelling in the age of machine learningPreprint
van Cranenburgh, S., Wang, S., Vij, A., Pereira, F. C., & Walker, J. L. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 9
Consequences of omitting non-lethal wildlife impacts from stated preference scenarios
Johnston, R. J., Börger, T., Hanley, N. D., Meginnis, K., Ndebele, T., Siyal, G. E. A., Beaumont, N., & de Vries, F. P. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2024.103011 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Rose, J. M., & Bliemer, M. C. J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Delft University of Technology (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Rose, John M.
- Venue
- Transport Reviews
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 587-617
- ISSN
- 0144-1647 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5327
- OpenAlex
- W2093584567
- Cited by
- 797
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 87 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 32.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transport Reviews (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Keywords
- stated choice experiment, orthogonal experimental design, estimator efficiency, sample size reduction, travel behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review