Cited by 106Transportation and Mobility InnovationsTransportation Planning and OptimizationUrban Transport and Accessibility

Integrated models of land use and transportation for the autonomous vehicle revolution

Hawkins, Jason, Nurul Habib, Khandker·2019·Transport Reviews

Abstract

The advent of the autonomous vehicle (AV) will affect not only the transportation system, but also future patterns of land development. Integrated land use and transportation models will be critical tools in assessing the path forward with this technology. Key questions with respect to land use impacts of AVs arise from potential changes in sensitivity to travel and reduced demand for parking. It is an open question whether AVs will induce urban sprawl, or whether spatial economies of agglomeration will mitigate any reductions in travel time sensitivity. The deployment of shared fleets of AVs would likely reduce parking demand, producing yet to be explored impacts on property development within existing urban footprints. We perform a critical assessment of currently operational models and their ability to represent the adoption of AVs. We identify the representation of time in such models as a vital component requiring additional development to model this new technology. Existing model applications have focused on the discrete addition of new infrastructure or policy at a fixed point in time, whereas AV adoption will occur incrementally through time. Stated adaptation surveys are recommended as tools to quantify preferences and develop relevant model inputs. It is argued that existing models that assume comparatively static equilibrium have been convenient in the past, but are insufficient to model technology adoption. In contrast, dynamic model frameworks lack sufficient structure to maintain reasonability under large perturbations from base conditions. The ongoing advancement of computing has allowed models to move away from being mechanistic aggregate tools, towards behaviourally rich depictions of individual persons and firms. However, much work remains to move from projections of existing conditions into the future, to the evolution of the spatial economy as it evolves through time in response to new technologies and exogenous stresses. Principles from complex and evolutionary systems theory will be important in the development of models with the capacity to consider such dynamics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01441647.2018.1449033

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hawkins, J., & Nurul Habib, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Corresponding author
Hawkins, Jason
Venue
Transport Reviews
Published
2018-03-12
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
66-83
ISSN
  • 0144-1647 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5327
OpenAlex
W2793921172
Cited by
106
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
FWCI
6.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transport Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ontario Graduate Scholarship
  • NSERC Discover Grant
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
Keywords
autonomous vehicles, land use and transportation integration, parking demand, urban sprawl, agglomeration economies, spatial economics, complexity theory, travel time sensitivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review