Online and mobile customer behaviour: a critical evaluation of Grounded Theory studies
Open accessAbstract
With the rapid increase in electronic and mobile commerce over the last few years, the academic literature on online and mobile customer behaviour has been fairly plentiful with a great deal of quantitative studies testing variations of existing customer behaviour theories. However, little attention has been given to qualitative studies in the field, which seek to explore new aspects of online or mobile customer behaviour, adding to existing theories or even creating new ones. Thus, the purpose of the present paper is to critically evaluate studies employing Grounded Theory (GT), a method commonly used for theory building in qualitative social research. Nine studies were identified examining online or mobile customer behaviour under this approach, providing theories based on emerging categories. Results of their studies seem to be very similar to existing customer behaviour theories, occasionally adding new categories to the existing theory nomenclature. Studies presented weaknesses regarding the accurate methodological conduct of GT and the process of generating theory, attributed predominantly to methodological, verification and reporting bias. Nevertheless, the main advantage of GT studies remains the generation of theory that can be applied in practice, reinforced by the presentation of conceptual prospects for testing new variables in quantitative studies. Overall, the contribution of GT studies to online and mobile customer behaviour research should be based on more rigorous methodology and aim to challenge rather than confirm existing theories with the purpose of advancing knowledge in the field.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Valvi et al. identified weaknesses regarding the methodological conduct of grounded theory which impacted the resulting generation of theory.
“Their study identified weaknesses regarding the methodological conduct of the GT which impacted the resulting generation of theory.17”
From Application of classic grounded theory in nursing studies: a qualitative systematic review protocol (2023) · cites this paper as [17]
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587 · see citing works
Wagner, H. R., Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575405 · Cited by 46,470 · see citing works
Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G., & Pilotta, J. J. (1985) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8 · Cited by 45,787 · see citing works
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,557 · see citing works
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737 · see citing works
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.
Ellis, C., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2074814 · Cited by 29,279 · see citing works
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709 · see citing works
(2006) · Cited by 18,730 · see citing works
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques
Long, D. R., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1993) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328955 · Cited by 17,612 · see citing works
Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis
Boyle, C., & Barker, A. (2006) · QMiP Bulletin · doi:10.53841/bpsqmip.2006.1.2.36 · Cited by 11,842 · see citing works
Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1007/bf00988593 · Cited by 11,133 · see citing works
Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry
Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2 · Cited by 9,184 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…be the identification of GT's evaluative criteria in online/mobile customer behaviour, in order to distinguish the fundamental elements (dependability, credibility, transferability, and confirmability) that make GT research trustworthy, accurate, verifiable, and rigorous (Creswell and Miller 2000).”
BackgroundUnderstanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model1
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250921 · Cited by 8,767 · see citing works
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Brodsky, C. (1968) · Psychosomatics · doi:10.1016/s0033-3182(68)71872-7 · Cited by 6,727 · see citing works
Stanton, B. F., & Rogers, E. M. (1963) · Journal of Farm Economics · doi:10.2307/1235767 · Cited by 6,725 · see citing works
The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research[1]
(2006) · Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/17465640610666642 · Cited by 5,854 · see citing works
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Londoño Fernández, J. L. (1994) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80230-0 · Cited by 5,754 · see citing works
Goulding, C. (2002) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781849209236 · Cited by 5,170 · see citing works
Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior
Koufaris, M. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.2.205.83 · Cited by 3,205 · see citing works
(1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,953 · see citing works
From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not
Suddaby, R. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.22083020 · Cited by 2,859 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Finally, GT is not presentation of raw data or routine application of formulaic techniques to data (Suddaby 2006, Tan 2010).”
BackgroundMethodChecklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?
Barbour, R. S. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115 · Cited by 2,613 · see citing works
Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling: Merging or clear boundaries?
Coyne, I. T. (1997) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x · Cited by 2,402 · see citing works
The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods
Buchanan, D., & Bryman, A. E. (2009) · Cited by 2,123 · see citing works
The Sacred and the Profane in Consumer Behavior: Theodicy on the Odyssey
Belk, R. W., Wallendorf, M., & Sherry, J. F. (1989) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209191 · Cited by 1,774 · see citing works
The Development of Constructivist Grounded Theory
Mills, J., Bonner, A., & Francis, K. (2006) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/160940690600500103 · Cited by 1,678 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…are to the subtle differences and complexity of the participants’ words and actions, their ability to reconstruct meaning from the data generated with the participant, while discriminating what is relevant from what is not (Schreiber 2001, Glaser 2002a, Glaser and Holton 2004, Mills et al. 2006).”
BackgroundBias and causal associations in observational research
Grimes, D. A., & Schulz, K. F. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07451-2 · Cited by 1,553 · see citing works
Qualitative Research and the Academy of Management Journal
Gephart, R. P. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2004.14438580 · Cited by 1,525 · see citing works
(2002) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203413081 · Cited by 1,459 · see citing works
Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature.
Murphy, Dingwall, Greatbatch, Parker, & Watson (1998) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta2160 · Cited by 1,107 · see citing works
Goulding, C. (2005) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090560510581782 · Cited by 944 · see citing works
Conceptualization: On Theory and Theorizing Using Grounded Theory
Glaser, B. G. (2002) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/160940690200100203 · Cited by 932 · see citing works
Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide for Management, Business and Market Researchers
Goulding, C. (2002) · Cited by 925 · see citing works
Building a model of local food consumption on trips and holidays: A grounded theory approach
Kim, Y. G., Eves, A., & Scarles, C. (2009) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2008.11.005 · Cited by 851 · see citing works
NURSING RESEARCH: A QUALITATIVE PERSPECTIVE
Parfitt, J. M. (1994) · AORN Journal · doi:10.1016/s0001-2092(07)68487-7 · Cited by 804 · see citing works
Glaser, B. G., & Holton, J. (2004) · Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research · doi:10.17169/fqs-5.2.607 · Cited by 783 · cited 7× · see citing works
“This core variable accounts for most of the variation around the problem that is the focus of the study and relates meaningfully with all other emerging categories (Glaser 1998, Glaser and Holton 2004).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGrounded Theory Methodology: Its Uses and Processes
Stern, P. N. (1980) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.1980.tb01455.x · Cited by 709 · see citing works
Exploring the Implications of M-Commerce for Markets and Marketing
Balasubraman, S., Peterson, R. A., & Järvenpää, S. L. (2002) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/009207002236910 · Cited by 686 · see citing works
Charmaz, K. (1995) · Rethinking Methods in Psychology · doi:10.4135/9781446221792.n3 · Cited by 650 · see citing works
Methodological issues in grounded theory
Cutcliffe, J. R. (2000) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01430.x · Cited by 642 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Next, treatment of the literature when GT is utilised has created conflicting ideas among researchers (Cutcliffe 2000, Martin 2006b, McCallin 2006).”
MethodInfluencing the online consumer's behavior: the Web experience
Constantinides, E. (2004) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/10662240410530835 · Cited by 625 · see citing works
The “core category” of grounded theory: Making constant comparisons
Hallberg, L. R.-M. (2006) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being · doi:10.1080/17482620600858399 · Cited by 600 · see citing works
A review for mobile commerce research and applications
Ngai, E. W. T., & Gunasekaran, A. (2005) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.003 · Cited by 530 · see citing works
Sampling In Qualitative Research
(2004) · The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods · doi:10.4135/9781412950589.n885 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
The place of the literature review in grounded theory research
Dunne, C. (2011) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2010.494930 · Cited by 488 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…the original discovery in 1967 (Glaser and Strauss 1967), its use has become widespread but has also led to considerable debate on how to optimally attain GT (Hallberg 2006), and its ontology and theoretical viewpoints have been the topics of polemic (Bowen 2009, Chen and Boore 2009, Dunne 2011).”
BackgroundFactors affecting purchase intention on mobile shopping web sites
Lu, H., & Yu‐Jen Su, P. (2009) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/10662240910981399 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
Jiang, P., & Rosenbloom, B. (2005) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090560510572061 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative review
McGauran, N., Wieseler, B., Kreis, J., Schüler, Y.-B., Kölsch, H., & Kaiser, T. (2010) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-11-37 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
Online Customer Experience: A Review of the Business-to-Consumer Online Purchase Context
Rose, S. D., Hair, N., & Clark, M. K. (2010) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00280.x · Cited by 435 · see citing works
Success Factors for Destination Marketing Web Sites: A Qualitative Meta-Analysis
Park, Y. A., & Ulrike Gretzel, B. (2007) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287507302381 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
Exploring the adoption and processing of online holiday reviews: A grounded theory approach
Papathanassis, A., & Knolle, F. (2010) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2009.12.005 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Lichtenstein, S., & Williamson, K. (2006) · Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Using Grounded Theory in Nursing
Barnsteiner, J. (2002) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.24041.x · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Constructivist Grounded Theory?
Glaser, B. G. (2002) · Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research · doi:10.17169/fqs-3.3.825 · Cited by 263 · cited 5× · see citing works
“…are to the subtle differences and complexity of the participants’ words and actions, their ability to reconstruct meaning from the data generated with the participant, while discriminating what is relevant from what is not (Schreiber 2001, Glaser 2002a, Glaser and Holton 2004, Mills et al. 2006).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDoyle, A. J. C. (1887) · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Supporting a grounded theory with an audit trail: an illustration
Bowen, G. A. (2008) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645570802156196 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Journal of Nursing Scholarship
(2010) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/(issn)1547-5069 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Mobile Word-Of-Mouth - A Grounded Theory of Mobile Viral Marketing
Palka, W., Pousttchi, K., & Wiedemann, D. G. (2009) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2008.37 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Common Pitfalls in Published Grounded Theory Research
Becker, P. H. (1993) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/104973239300300207 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Madell, D. E., & Muncer, S. J. (2007) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9980 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Hammersley, M., & Gomm, R. (1997) · Sociological Research Online · doi:10.5153/sro.55 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Towards an appropriate business model for m-commerce
Yuan, Y., & Zhang, J. J. (2003) · International Journal of Mobile Communications · doi:10.1504/ijmc.2003.002459 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Methodologic Mistakes in Grounded Theory
Wilson, H. S., & Hutchinson, S. A. (1996) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-199603000-00012 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Critical Reading and Writing for Postgraduates
Wall, K. (2007) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Online Consumer Behavior: A Review and Agenda for Future Research
Chan, G. W. W., Cheung, C. M. K., Kwong, T., Limayem, M., & Zhu, L. (2003) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Using grounded theory to model visitor experiences at heritage sites
Daengbuppha, J., Hemmington, N., & Wilkes, K. (2006) · Qualitative Market Research An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13522750610689096 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Grounded theory and management research: a lack of integrity?
Jones, R. G., & Noble, G. (2007) · Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/17465640710778502 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Machi, L. A. (2008) · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Grounded theory in practice: issues and discussion for new qualitative researchers
Jin, T. (2010) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/00220411011016380 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Ranaweera, C., McDougall, G. H. G., & Bansal, H. S. (2005) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/1470593105049601 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Wagner, S. M., Lukassen, P., & Mahlendorf, M. D. (2009) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.05.007 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
A review of factors affecting online consumer search behaviour from an information value perspective
Grant, R., Clarke, R. J., & Kyriazis, E. (2007) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1362/026725707x212801 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Abdul‐Muhmin, A. G. (2010) · Journal of International Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1080/08961530.2011.524571 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Park, T., Shenoy, R., & Salvendy, G. (2008) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449290600958882 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Critical review of the e-loyalty literature: a purchase-centred framework
Valvi, A. C., & Fragkos, K. C. (2012) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-012-9097-5 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Self-citationCritical Reading and Writing for Postgraduates
Wallace, M., & Alison Wray, A. (2006) · ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Using a synthesised technique for grounded theory in nursing research
Chen, H., & Boore, J. R. P. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02684.x · Cited by 83 · see citing works
"Naturalist Inquiry" and Grounded Theory
Glaser, B. G. (2008) · Forum qualitative Sozialforschung · doi:10.17169/fqs-5.1.652 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
A grounded theory of beer consumption in Australia
Pettigrew, S. (2002) · Qualitative Market Research An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13522750210423814 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Payne, S. A. (2007) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446207536.d12 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
A Critical Review of the E-Satisfaction Literature
Chen, Q., Rodgers, S., & He, Y. (2008) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764208321340 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Consumers' accounts of perceived risk online and the influence of communication sources
Andrews, L., & Boyle, M. V. (2008) · Qualitative Market Research An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13522750810845559 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Grounded Theory-Based Research within Exercise Psychology: A Critical Review
Hutchison, A. J., Johnston, L., & Breckon, J. (2011) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780880903304527 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Stop. Write! Writing Grounded Theory
Glaser, B. G., & Hon., H. (2012) · The grounded theory review · Cited by 44 · see citing works
A Grounded Theory Approach to Understanding the Website Experiences of Restaurant Customers
Namkung, Y., Shin, S.-Y., & Yang, I.-S. (2007) · Journal of Foodservice Business Research · doi:10.1300/j369v10n01_05 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Wu, X., Chen, Q., Zhou, W., & Guo, J. (2010) · International Journal of Mobile Communications · doi:10.1504/ijmc.2010.034936 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Grounded theory for generating theory in the study of behavior
González‐Teruel, A., & García, M. F. A. (2011) · Library & Information Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2011.02.006 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
The Impact of Symbolic Interaction on Grounded Theory
Glaser, B. G. (2005) · The grounded theory review · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Brunger, W. G., & Perelli, S. J. (2008) · Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management · doi:10.1057/rpm.2008.31 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Critical reading and writing for postgraduates. 2nd ed.
Wallace, M., & Alison Wray, A. (2011) · Sage eBooks · Cited by 21 · see citing works
The Postmodern Turn: Shall Classic Grounded Theory Take That Detour? A Review Essay
Martin, V. B. (2006) · The grounded theory review · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Grappling with the literature in a grounded theory study
McCallin, A. M. (2006) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Security perception in e-commerce websites - A customer's perspective.
Halaweh, M., Fidler, C. S., & McRobb, S. (2008) · DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Martin, V. B. (2005) · The grounded theory review · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 95 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Analysis and prediction of Ε-customers' behavior by mining clickstream data
Silahtaroğlu, G., & Donertasli, H. (2015) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata.2015.7363908 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Qualitative Inquiry in Management: Methodological Dilemmas and Concerns in Meta‐Analysis
Point, S., Fendt, J., & Jonsen, K. (2016) · European Management Review · doi:10.1111/emre.12097 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Ang, J.-Y., Ooi, G. S., Aziz, F. A., & Tong, S. F. (2023) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice · doi:10.1186/s40545-023-00645-x · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“…acceptance and experience of new services provided by the internet (such as internet banking, e-commerce, travel online and socialisation) [31], but may not provide a sufficient empirical explanation of the public’s online purchasing behaviour in relation to health-related products…”
BackgroundAntecedents and Consequences of Online Healthcare Community Usage: A Grounded Theory Approach
Wang, Z., Zhang, X., Han, D., & Ma, L. (2022) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare10091749 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“It has seen use in various fields of the social sciences [12].”
BackgroundCheer, K., MacLaren, D. J., & Tsey, K. (2015) · Contemporary Nurse · doi:10.1080/10376178.2016.1157445 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Xie, Y., Arman, S. M., & Su, C. (2025) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2025.101489 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Lassig, C. J. (2022) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x211069571 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Application of classic grounded theory in nursing studies: a qualitative systematic review protocol
Connor, J., Flenady, T., Dwyer, T., & Massey, D. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068588 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Mouse Movement Pattern Based Analysis of Customer Behavior (CBA-MMP) Using Cloud Data Analytics
Kannan, J. R., Sabitha, R., Karthik, S., & Shanthini, J. (2020) · Wireless Personal Communications · doi:10.1007/s11277-020-07055-1 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Cordente-Rodríguez, M., Splendiani, S., & Silvestrelli, P. (2020) · Applied Computer Science · doi:10.35784/acs-2020-11 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Gerli, P., da Rocha, F. N., & Mora, L. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-04320-7 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“The preference among researchers for success stories is often associated with con fi rmation biases (Evers & Wu, 2006; Valvi et al., 2013), which re fl ects the “ tendency to seek only information that would con fi rm a guess or a hypothesis ” (Toshkov, 2016, p. 11).”
Ogano, N. O. (2016) · UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Perilaku Pelanggan untuk Mengadopsi M-Commerce di pada Generasi Y
Batmetan, J. R., Suares, J. D. C. L., & Suyoto, S. (2018) · CogITo Smart Journal · doi:10.31154/cogito.v4i1.111.188-199
Uncovering latent needs in longevity planning: A case study using mixed-methods and system modelling
Lee, S., & Weck, O. L. D. (2025) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/j.destud.2025.101373
- Authors
- Valvi, A. C., Frangos, C. C., & Frangos, C. C.
- Affiliations
- Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Valvi, Aikaterini C.
- Venue
- Behaviour & Information Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 655-667
- ISSN
- 0144-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1362-3001
- OpenAlex
- W2089924297
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 95
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 6.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- discovery.ucl.ac.uk
- Locations
- Behaviour and Information Technology (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Keywords
- grounded theory, theory development, qualitative research methodology, methodological bias, reporting bias, theory testing, e-commerce, mobile commerce
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review