Cited by 78Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMedia Influence and HealthBehavioral Health and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preventing problematic Internet use through video-based interventions: a theoretical model and empirical test

Turel, Ofir, Mouttapa, Michele, Donato, Elaine·2015·Behaviour & Information Technology

Abstract

This study relies on the core ideas of the health belief model and suggests that short informational videos on Internet ‘addiction’ can be an effective means towards preventing problematic use of the Internet through their ability to drive changes in viewers’ attitudes towards reducing their Internet use. Building on the heuristic-systematic model of information processing viewpoint, it is further suggested that this attitude change is guided by the information the videos provide, as well as the surprise emotion they generate. To test this model, data were collected at three points in time from 223 participants who were exposed to one of two video interventions. Partial least-square analyses indicated that the videos were efficacious in improving viewers’ attitudes towards reducing their Internet use, after accounting for viewers’ preexisting attitudes, levels of Internet ‘addiction’, demographics and social desirability bias. Consistent with the heuristic-systematic model of information-processing perspective this effect was mobilised simultaneously through the information and surprise induced by the videos.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0144929x.2014.936041

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Abbaszadeh A., 2011, Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 16, 195
  2. Cohen J. B., 1991, Handbook of Consumer Theory and Research, 188
  3. 10.1037/0022-006X.67.6.959 · DOI
  4. Marlatt G. A., 1996, Addiction, 91
  5. NIAAA, 2005, Brief Intervention

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Turel, O., Mouttapa, M., & Donato, E.
Affiliations
  • California State University, Fullerton (US)
  • Orange County Department of Education (US)
Corresponding author
Turel, Ofir
Venue
Behaviour & Information Technology
Published
2014-07-07
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
349-362
ISSN
  • 0144-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-3001
OpenAlex
W2053706249
Cited by
78
References
87
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3
FWCI
21.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour and Information Technology (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
problematic internet use, internet addiction, video-based intervention, Health Belief Model, heuristic-systematic model, attitude change, informational videos, prevention, information processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review