Cited by 23Technostress in Professional SettingsJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorCorporate Management and Leadership

The shadows of digitisation: on the losses of health-oriented leadership in the face of ICT hassles

Klebe, Laura, Felfe, Jörg, Krick, Annika, Pischel, Sarah·2024·Behaviour & Information Technology

Abstract

Research shows positive effects of health-oriented leadership (HoL) on employees. However, the increasing spread of working from home may challenge leadership effectiveness. This study examines whether ICT hassles weaken the positive relationships between HoL and follower outcomes. Effectiveness of HoL was tested as perceived by employees while working from home for 1) employee exhaustion with an experimental vignette study (N = 138), and 2) employee strain and engagement in a survey with two measurement points (N = 214). Results provided evidence for lower exhaustion and strain, and higher engagement with more HoL. Results also showed higher exhaustion and strain, and lower engagement with more ICT hassles. Moreover, the relationships of HoL with employee outcomes were weaker with more ICT hassles. Findings provide initial evidence that HoL positively affects employees when working from home, but that its effectiveness may be impaired by technical issues. Findings suggest that in order to maintain the effectiveness of HoL while working from home, organisations must provide reliable IT equipment and technical support. The study ties in with research on digital leadership and leadership effectiveness and contributes to the deeper understanding of situational contingencies of health-specific leadership during the process of digitisation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0144929x.2023.2183053

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Study 1, there is a negative relationship between staff care and exhaustion.

    “Study 1: negative relationship between staff care and exhaustion which is moderated by ICT hassles in a way that the effect of staff care is weaker when ICT hassles are high Study 2: negative relationship between staff care and strain which lost significance when ICT hassles are high”

    From Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Klebe et al. (2023)

  • In Study 1, the negative relationship between staff care and exhaustion is moderated by ICT hassles such that the effect of staff care is weaker when ICT hassles are high.

    “Study 1: negative relationship between staff care and exhaustion which is moderated by ICT hassles in a way that the effect of staff care is weaker when ICT hassles are high Study 2: negative relationship between staff care and strain which lost significance when ICT hassles are high”

    From Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Klebe et al. (2023)

  • In Study 2, there is a negative relationship between staff care and strain.

    “Study 1: negative relationship between staff care and exhaustion which is moderated by ICT hassles in a way that the effect of staff care is weaker when ICT hassles are high Study 2: negative relationship between staff care and strain which lost significance when ICT hassles are high”

    From Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Klebe et al. (2023)

  • In Study 2, the negative relationship between staff care and strain lost significance when ICT hassles are high.

    “Study 1: negative relationship between staff care and exhaustion which is moderated by ICT hassles in a way that the effect of staff care is weaker when ICT hassles are high Study 2: negative relationship between staff care and strain which lost significance when ICT hassles are high”

    From Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Klebe et al. (2023)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klebe, L., Felfe, J., Krick, A., & Pischel, S.
Affiliations
Helmut Schmidt University (DE)
Corresponding author
Klebe, Laura
Venue
Behaviour & Information Technology
Published
2023-02-24
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
605-622
ISSN
  • 0144-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-3001
OpenAlex
W4321783447
Cited by
23
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4
FWCI
6.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour and Information Technology (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Digitalization and Technology Research Center of the Bundeswehr
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Management and Leadership
Keywords
health-oriented leadership, working from home, employee exhaustion, employee strain, employee engagement, digital leadership, leadership effectiveness, digitization, technical support, situational contingencies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review