CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 198Online and Blended LearningTeam Dynamics and PerformanceDigital Communication and Language

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A cross‐cultural study of group process and development in online conferences

Gunawardena, Charlotte N., Nolla, Ana C., Wilson, Penne L., Lopez‐Islas, Jose R., Ramirez‐Angel, Noemi, Megchun‐Alpizar, Rosa M.·2001·Distance Education
DOI 10.1080/0158791010220106
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Employing survey and focus group data, this study examined if there are differences in perception of online group process and development between participants in Mexico and the United States of America (USA). Survey data indicated significant differences in perception for the Norming and Performing stages of group development. The groups also differed in their perception of collectivism, low power distance, femininity, and high context communication. Country differences rather than age and gender differences, accounted for the differences observed. Focus group participants identified several factors that influence online group process and development: (1) language; (2) power distance; (3) gender differences; (4) collectivist vs. individualist tendencies; (5) conflict; (6) social presence; (7) time frame; and (8) technical skills.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0158791010220106

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Barret, M., Drummond, A. and Sahay, S. ‘Exploring the impact of cross‐cultural differences in international software teams: Indian expatriates in Jamaica’.Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems. pp.347–56.
  2. Baym N.K., 1995, Cybersociety, 138
  3. Bell Ross R., 1998, Civic Discourse: Multiculturalism, Cultural Diversity, and Global Communication, 31
  4. Clark D., 1997, Big Dog's Leadership Training and Development Outline
  5. _____, 1976, Beyond Culture
  6. Harasim L., 1990, On Line Education: Perspectives on a New Environment
  7. Hartman K., 1995, Computer Mediated Communication and the Online Classroom: Volume II, Higher Education, 47
  8. Robinson J.W., 1974, Understanding and Developing Process Skills: An Introduction
  9. Shaw J.B., 1998, Human Relations, 5, 1307
  10. Wegerif R., 1998, The Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2
  11. Wilson, P.L., Gunawardena, C.N. and Nolla, A.C. ‘Cultural factors influencing on‐line interaction and group dynamics’.Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning. Madison, Wisconsin. pp.449–56.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 198

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Gunawardena, C. N., Nolla, A. C., Wilson, P. L., Lopez‐Islas, J. R., Ramirez‐Angel, N., & Megchun‐Alpizar, R. M.
ORCID
Gunawardena, Charlotte N.
Venue
Distance Education
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2001-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
85-121
ISSN
  • 0158-7919 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-0198
DOI
10.1080/0158791010220106
OpenAlex
W2072114035
Cited by
198
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
27.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Distance Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Digital Communication and Language
Keywords
group development, cross-cultural comparison, virtual conference, collectivism, power distance, femininity, high-context communication, language barriers, gender differences, conflict, social presence, technical skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review