Cited by 15Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Implementation of a Mindfulness Intervention for Women in Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder and Its Effects on Depression Symptoms

Alexander, Karen, Kronk, Rebecca, Sekula, Kathleen, Short, Vanessa, Abatemarco, Diane·2019·Issues in Mental Health Nursing

Abstract

Background: Many women in treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) also experience mental health co-morbidities. Mindfulness intervention has demonstrated effectiveness for improving mental health in the general population, but has not been tested with female populations in OUD treatment. The purpose of this study was to describe characteristics associated with participation in a mindfulness intervention provided to women in treatment for OUD, and also to evaluate the effectiveness of a mindfulness intervention on depression symptoms.Aims: To evaluate participation characteristics associated with a mindfulness intervention and to assess the impact of a mindfulness intervention on depression symptoms for women with OUD.Methods: A secondary data analysis of a mindfulness intervention with women in treatment for OUD was accomplished. Bivariate analysis was conducted to determine any sociodemographic variables associated with intervention participation. Depression scores were assessed pre and post intervention using paired samples t tests for the intervention group (n = 65) and the control group (n = 8).Results: A 45% of women in the study reported moderate to severe depression symptoms at baseline, and 63% reported high levels of childhood trauma. There was a significant decrease in depression scores (M = 3.6 [1.2,6.1]) following the mindfulness intervention for the intervention group (t(64) = 3.1, p = .003). Participants entering the intervention group with moderate to severe depression scores experienced the most significant decrease in depression symptoms (M = 6.6, SD = 13.5), (t(64) = −2.1, p < .05).Conclusions: Women in treatment for OUD experience high levels of depression symptoms and past trauma, and mindfulness is a feasible intervention for OUD populations which may improve depression symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01612840.2019.1585499

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alexander, K., Kronk, R., Sekula, K., Short, V., & Abatemarco, D.
Affiliations
  • Thomas Jefferson University (US)
  • Duquesne University (US)
Corresponding author
Alexander, Karen
Venue
Issues in Mental Health Nursing
Published
2019-05-17
Volume
40
Issue
8
Pages
690-696
ISSN
  • 0161-2840 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-4673
OpenAlex
W2945071940
Cited by
15
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Issues in Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau (90CB0190)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, opioid use disorder, women, depressive symptoms, childhood trauma, addiction treatment, psychiatric comorbidity, feasibility
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Opioid-Related Disorders, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Young Adult, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review