Cited by 176Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The contribution of mindfulness‐based therapies for children and families and proposed conceptual integration

Harnett, Paul H., Dawe, Sharon·2012·Child and Adolescent Mental Health

Abstract

Background: Mindfulness is the development of a nonjudgmental accepting awareness of moment‐by‐moment experience. Intentionally attending to one’s ongoing stream of sensations, thoughts, and emotions as they arise has a number of benefits, including the ability to react with greater flexibility to events and sustain attention. Thus the teaching of mindfulness‐based skills to children and their carers is a potential means of improving family relationships and helping children achieve more positive developmental outcomes through increased ability to sustain attention and manage emotions. We provide a review of recent studies evaluating mindfulness‐based interventions targeting children, adolescents, and families in educational and clinical settings. Method: Searches were conducted of several databases (including Medline, PsychINFO and Cochrane Reviews) to identify studies that have evaluated mindfulness‐based interventions targeting children, adolescents or families published since 2009. Results: Twenty‐four studies were identified. We conclude that mindfulness‐based interventions are an important addition to the repertoire of existing therapeutic techniques. However, large‐scale, methodologically rigorous studies are lacking. The interventions used in treatment evaluations vary in both content and dose, the outcomes targeted have varied, and no studies have employed methodology to investigate mechanisms of change. Conclusions: There is increasing evidence that mindfulness‐based therapeutic techniques can have a positive impact on a range of outcome variables. A greater understanding of the mechanisms of change is an important future direction of research. We argue that locating mindfulness‐based therapies targeting children and families within the broader child and family field has greater promise in improving child and family functioning than viewing mindful parenting as an independent endeavor.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-3588.2011.00643.x

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harnett, P. H., & Dawe, S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Harnett, Paul H.
Venue
Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-01-17
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
195-208
ISSN
  • 1475-357X (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3588
OpenAlex
W1904914028
Cited by
176
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child and Adolescent Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, children, family, mindful parenting, family relationships, attention, emotion regulation, mechanisms of change, adolescents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review