The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward an understanding of fluency: A microanalysis of nonnative speaker conversations
Abstract
There have been few attempts to specify precisely what fluency is, although it is a term that is used and understood by both laypeople and linguists. With one objective being to achieve a greater understanding of what comprises fluency, this study explores the speech of six nonnative speakers of English who had been rated by English instructors as either “fluent” or “nonfluent.” Excerpts of audiotaped dialogues were analyzed, both at the utterance level and at the discourse level, in terms of the frequency and possible function of features that have often been ascribed to fluency (hesitation phenomena, repair, and rate of speech). More functionally oriented pragmatic features that relate to topic control and initiation were also examined. Comparison of subgroups on the basis of perceived fluency or lack of fluency provided few statistically significant results, although the findings of qualitative analyses suggest that fluency is a complex, high‐order linguistic phenomenon and that intuitive judgments about fluency level—such as those made by the raters for this study—may take into account a wide range of linguistic phenomena. Thus, this study offers an innovative approach to understanding fluency, with possibly implications for the teaching and testing of languages, as well as for research on second language acquisition processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977) · Language · doi:10.2307/413107 · Cited by 5,150
Planned and Unplanned Discourse
Ochs, E. (1979) · Discourse and Syntax · doi:10.1163/9789004368897_004 · Cited by 561
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Akinnaso F. N., 1982, Language and Speech, 25, 97, 10.1177/002383098202500201 · DOI · Paper page
- Butler‐Wall B., 1986, The frequency and function of disfluencies in native and non‐native conversational discourse
- Chafe W., 1985, Perspectives on silence, 77
- Crown C. L., 1985, Perspectives on silence, 31
- Deese J., 1980, Temporal variables in speech: Studies in honour of Frieda Goldman‐Eisler, 69, 10.1515/9783110816570.69 · DOI
- Dickerson W. B., 1971, Hesitation phenomena in the spontaneous speech of nonnative speakers of English
- Fiksdal S., 1990, The right time and place
- Gaies S. J., 1977, On TESOL ‘77, 204
- Fillmore C. J., 1979, Individual differences in language ability and language behavior, 85, 10.1016/B978-0-12-255950-1.50012-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Grosjean F., 1980, Temporal variables in speech: Studies in honour of Frieda Goldman‐Eisler, 91, 10.1515/9783110816570.91 · doi:10.1515/9783110816570.91
- Hawkins P. R., 1971, Language and Speech, 14, 277, 10.1177/002383097101400308 · DOI
- Hieke A. E., 1981, Language and Speech, 24, 147, 10.1177/002383098102400203 · DOI
- Jefferson G., 1984, Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 346
- Jefferson G., 1979, Language and Society, 2, 181
- Kowal S., 1980, Temporal variables in speech: Studies in honour of Frieda Goldman‐Eisler, 61, 10.1515/9783110816570.61 · doi:10.1515/9783110816570.61
- Long M., 1983, Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition, 268
- Ochs E., 1979, Syntax and semantics: Vol. 12. Discourse and syntax, 12, 51
- Raupach M., 1980, Temporal variables in speech: Studies in honour of Frieda Goldman‐Eisler, 49
- Rohde L., 1985, Learner discourse: Anglica et Americana, 43
- Schegloff E. A., 1979, Syntax and semantics: Vol. 12. Discourse and syntax, 12, 261
- Schiffrin D., 1987, Studies in interactional sociolinguistics: Vol. 5. Discourse markers, 5
- Tannen D., 1982, Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy, 1
Cited by
Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners
Kormos, J., & Dénes (2004) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001 · Cited by 679
Oral Language and Reading in Bilingual Children
Miller, J. F., Heilmann, J., Nockerts, A., Iglesias, A., Fabiano, L., & Francis, D. J. (2006) · Learning Disabilities Research & Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2006.00205.x · Cited by 408
KANG, O., RUBIN, D., & PICKERING, L. (2010) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01091.x · Cited by 347
Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness
Kang, O. (2010) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2010.01.005 · Cited by 327
Assessing bilingual dominance.
FLEGE, J. E., MACKAY, I. R. A., & PISKE, T. (2002) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716402004046 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Riggenbach, H.
- Venue
- Discourse Processes
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1991-10
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 423-441
- ISSN
- 0163-853X (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6950
- OpenAlex
- W2076110671
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward an understanding of fluency: A microanalysis of nonnative speaker conversations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01638539109544795
- The paper
- Riggenbach, H. (1991). Toward an understanding of fluency: A microanalysis of nonnative speaker conversations. Discourse Processes. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539109544795
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.