Cited by 271Educational Strategies and EpistemologiesLinguistics and Education ResearchInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of Oral Discussion on Written Argument

Reznitskaya, Alina, Anderson, Richard C., McNurlen, Brian, Nguyen-Jahiel, Kim, Archodidou, Anthi, Kim, So-young·2001·Discourse Processes

DOI 10.1080/0163853x.2001.9651596

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article examines the effects of participation in oral argumentation on the development of individual reasoning as expressed in persuasive essays. Engagement in oral argumentation is the essential feature of a classroom discussion method called collaborative reasoning. A premise of this method is that reasoning is fundamentally dialogical and, hence, the development of reasoning is best nurtured in supportive dialogical settings such as group discussion. Students from 3 classrooms participated in collaborative reasoning discussions for a period of 5 weeks. Then, these students and students from 3 comparable classrooms who had not engaged in collaborative reasoning wrote persuasive essays. The essays of collaborative reasoning students contained a significantly greater number of relevant arguments, counter-arguments, rebuttals, formal argument devices, and uses of text information.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0163853x.2001.9651596

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Speech Genres and Other Late Essays
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986) · University of Texas Press eBooks · doi:10.7560/720466 · Cited by 9,079
A power primer.
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771
The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays
Wasiolek, E., Bakhtin, M. M., Holquist, M., & Emerson, C. G. (1982) · Comparative Literature · doi:10.2307/1770763 · Cited by 7,540
Handbook of reading research
Pearson, P. D., Barr, (. E., Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. B., & Barr, R. (1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5764 · Cited by 6,850
Multiple regression in behavioral research
Kerlinger, F. N., & Pedhazur, E. J. (1973) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,919
Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning
Cazden, C. B. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,045
Eliciting Self‐Explanations Improves Understanding
Michelene, T. H., Leeuw, N. D., Chiu, M., & Lavancher, C. (1994) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/0364-0213(94)90016-7 · Cited by 2,492
The Skills of Argument
Kuhn, D. (1991) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571350 · Cited by 2,094
Pragmatic reasoning schemas
Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (1985) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(85)90014-3 · Cited by 1,463
A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension
Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524513.007 · Cited by 1,207
Self-citation

Show all 45 references

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 271

Developing Face-to-Face Argumentation Skills: Does Arguing on the Computer Help?
Iordanou, K. (2013) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1080/15248372.2012.668732 · Cited by 37
“Transfer has also been exhibited across communication modes, from dialogic argumentation to individual written argument (Kuhn & Crowell, 2011; Kuhn, Goh, et al., 2008; Reznitskaya et al., 2001).”
Background
Integrating Collaborative Reasoning and Strategy Instruction to Improve Second Graders’ Opinion Writing
Philippakos, Z. A. T., & MacArthur, C. A. (2019) · Reading & Writing Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10573569.2019.1650315 · Cited by 35
“Furthermore, a review of four studies of CR (Reznitskaya et al., 2001) found positive transfer effects to writing; students in classrooms using CR included more reasons, counterarguments, and rebuttals in reflective responses to stories compared to students in control classrooms.”
Background
Examining students' use of online annotation tools in support of argumentative reading
Lu, J., & Deng, L. (2013) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.159 · Cited by 32
Social influences on children's development of relational thinking during small-group discussions
Lin, T., Anderson, R. C., Jadallah, M., Nguyen‐Jahiel, K., Kim, I., Kuo, L., Miller, B., Logis, H. A., Dong, T., Wu, X., et al. (2014) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.12.004 · Cited by 32
Self-citation
Epistemic and interpersonal dimensions of peer argumentation: Conceptualization and quantitative assessment
Asterhan, C. S. C., Baker, M. J., Andriessen, J. E. B., & Järvelä, S. (2013) · Cited by 32
The Quality of Writing Tasks and Students’ Use of Academic Language in Spanish
Crosson, A. C., Matsumura, L. C., Correnti, R. J., & Arlotta-Guerrero, A. (2012) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/663298 · Cited by 33
“Although carefully orchestrated classroom discussions certainly contribute to students’ opportunity to learn to use academic language (e.g., Reznitskaya et al., 2001), many structures and rhetorical features common in academic writing are rare in oral language exchanges.”
Background
Building a game-enhanced formative assessment to gather evidence about middle school students’ argumentation skills
Yi, S., & Sparks, J. R. (2019) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-018-9637-3 · Cited by 38
“Literature on dia-logic argument (Goldstein et al. 2009; Kuhn and Crowell 2011; Kuhn and Udell 2007; Reznitskaya et al. 2001) shows that embedding argumentation in a dialogic context facilitates the development of audience awareness, increases students’ sensitivity to alternative perspectives, and…”
Background
The progression of collaborative argumentation among English learners: A qualitative study
Su, Y., Liu, K., Lai, C., & Jin, T. (2021) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2021.102471 · Cited by 36
“…a collaborative argumentation approach that engages students in group work to construct an argument collaboratively to help them improve their argumentation ability (MacArthur, Ferretti, & Okolo, 2002; Reznitskaya, Anderson, & Kuo, 2007; Reznitskaya et al., 2001; Short, Van der Eb, & McKay, 2020).”
Background
Teaching argumentative synthesis writing through deliberative dialogues: instructional practices in secondary education
Casado-Ledesma, L., Cuevas, I., Van den Bergh, H., Rijlaarsdam, G., Mateos, M., Granado-Peinado, M., & Martín, E. (2021) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-021-09548-3 · Cited by 29
Teaching for Wisdom
Sternberg, R. J. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199557257.013.0047 · Cited by 30
Instructional patterns for the teaching and learning of argumentative writing in high school English language arts classrooms
Lin, T., Nagpal, M. N., VanDerHeide, J., Ha, S. Y., & Newell, G. E. (2020) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-020-10056-y · Cited by 30
Influence of Cultural Norms and Collaborative Discussions on Children's Reflective Essays
Kim, I., Anderson, R. C., Miller, B., Jeong, J., & Swim, T. J. (2011) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/0163853x.2011.606098 · Cited by 27
“For analyses of argument elements, the coding scheme was adapted from the one used by Reznitskaya et al. (2001).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
Visualising knowledge from chat debates in argument diagrams
Salminen, T., Marttunen, M. J., & Laurinen, L. I. (2010) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00354.x · Cited by 27
Development of reasoning skills through participation in collaborative synchronous online discussions
Kim, I.-H. (2014) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2012.680970 · Cited by 32
Developing Symbolic Interpretation Through Literary Argumentation
Sosa, T., Hall, A., Goldman, S. R., & Lee, C. D. (2015) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2015.1124040 · Cited by 32
“Applebee et al. (2003) as well as others (Marshall et al., 1995; Reznitskaya et al., 2001) have also shown that the knowledge and skills evident in classroom discussions translate into improvements in individual students’ written work.”
Background
Bolstering students’ written argumentation by refining an effective discourse intervention: negotiating the fine line between flexibility and fidelity
Firetto, C. M., Murphy, P. K., Greene, J. A., Li, M., Wei, L., Montalbano, C., Hendrick, B. D., & Croninger, R. M. V. (2018) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-018-9477-x · Cited by 27
Improving the Historical Knowledge and Writing of Students With or At Risk for LD
Paz, S. D. L., & Wissinger, D. R. (2016) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/0022219416659444 · Cited by 30
“Prior research suggests that introducing students to argument schemes like those described in Walton and colleagues’ (2008) framework not only facilitate the organization and retrieval of argument-relevant information during discussions (Felton & Herko, 2004; Nussbaum & Edwards, 2011) but also allow them to apply newl…”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Understanding students’ conceptions of task assignments
List, A., Du, H., & Wang, Y. (2019) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101801 · Cited by 24
A cross‐cultural study of the effect of a graph‐oriented computer‐assisted project‐based learning environment on middle school students' science knowledge and argumentation skills
Hsu, P.-S., Dyke, M. V., Chen, Y., & Smith, T. J. (2015) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12118 · Cited by 28
Determination of Students' Argument Levels in Argumentation-Based Social Studies Course
Törün, F., & Şahin, S. (2016) · TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM · doi:10.15390/eb.2016.6322 · Cited by 23
Collaborative Reasoning: Language‐Rich Discussions for English Learners
Zhang, J., & Stahl, K. A. D. (2011) · The Reading Teacher · doi:10.1002/trtr.01040 · Cited by 21
Cooperative methods and self-regulated strategies development for argumentative writing
Prata, M. J., de Sousa, B. C., Festas, I., & de Oliveira, A. L. (2018) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.2018.1427037 · Cited by 24
“…different points of view (Johnson & Johnson, 1999) and generating more and more diverse arguments, both in favor and against their points of view (Reznitskaya et al., 2001); third, following the mnemonic to plan an argumentative text, students brainstormed ideas about the topic; fourth, students…”
Background
Forming a belief: The contribution of comprehension to the evaluation and persuasive impact of argumentative text
Diakidoy, I. N., Christodoulou, S. A., Floros, G., Iordanou, K., & Kargopoulos, P. (2015) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12074 · Cited by 21
Moving ideas: an exploration of students’ use of dialogue for writing in history
van Drie, J., & van de Ven, P. (2017) · Language and Education · doi:10.1080/09500782.2017.1326504 · Cited by 19
“Participating in discourse before writing is found to have positive effects on writing (e.g. Chinn, Anderson, and Waggoner 2001; Reznitskaya et al. 2001; Rivard and Straw 2000).”
The refinement of a construct for tests of academic literacy
Patterson, R., & Weideman, A. (2013) · Journal for Language Teaching · doi:10.4314/jlt.v47i1.6 · Cited by 20
Dialogic teaching of controversial public issues in a Chinese middle school
Shi, Y., Shen, X., Tao, W., Cheng, L., & Wang, A. (2021) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100533 · Cited by 25
Children’s Moral Reasoning: Influence of Culture and Collaborative Discussion
Zhang, X., Li, Y., Nguyen‐Jahiel, K., Lin, T., Miller, B., Anderson, R. C., & Dong, T. (2013) · Journal of Cognition and Culture · doi:10.1163/15685373-12342106 · Cited by 20
“This is not a new finding, but only a confirmation of the findings of the original studies (Dong et al., 2008, 2009; Reznitskaya et al., 2001) from the reanalysis of the children’s essays based on the revised coding scheme.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citation
Concurrent student-managed discussions in a large class
Dong, T., Anderson, R. C., Lin, T., & Wu, X. (2009) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2010.03.005 · Cited by 19
Self-citation
The Interplay Between Student-Led Discussions and Argumentative Writing
Wagner, C. J., Parra, M. O., & Proctor, C. P. (2016) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.340 · Cited by 19
Building agency through technology-aided dialogic teaching
Omland, M., & Rødnes, K. A. (2020) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100406 · Cited by 19
Reaching agreement: The structure & pragmatics of critical care nurses’ informal argument
Hagler, D. A., & Brem, S. K. (2008) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.05.002 · Cited by 19
“Voss, Greene, Post, and Penner (1983) illustrated the interconnected and interchangeable nature of argument moves in real settings, and Toulmin’s work has been applied to fairly complex examples of discourse (Chinn & Anderson, 1998; Reznitskaya et al., 2001 ) and classroom activity (Driver & Osborne, 2000).”
Background
Discussion method accuracy in Islamic higher education: the influence of gender and teaching duration
Tambak, S., Hamzah, H., Ahmad, M. Y., Siregar, E., Sukenti, D., Sabdin, M., & Rohimah, R. B. (2022) · Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan · doi:10.21831/cp.v41i2.40644 · Cited by 56
Examining pre-service science teachers’ development and utilization of written and oral argument and representation resources in an argument-based inquiry environment
Yaman, F., & Hand, B. M. (2022) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/d2rp00152g · Cited by 16
Constructed dialogs reveal skill development in argumentive writing
Shi, Y. (2020) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-020-10045-1 · Cited by 17
Teaching Sacred Texts in the Classroom: The Pedagogy ofTransmissionand the Pedagogy ofInterpretive Facilitation
Hassenfeld, Z. R. (2017) · Journal of Jewish Education · doi:10.1080/15244113.2018.1378562 · Cited by 16
“…that come from an approach to text instruction that prioritizes students’ textual inquiry in the classroom (Aukerman, 2007; Burbules, 1993; Cazden, 2001; Chinn, Anderson, & Waggoner, 2001; Copenhaver, 2001; Dyson, 1993; Eeds &Wells, 1989; Lewis, 1993; Paley, 1986; Reznitskaya et al., 2001).”
Background
Strategies that promote historical reasoning and contextualization: a pilot intervention with urban high school students
Paz, S. D. L., Wissinger, D. R., Gross, M. H., & Butler, C. M. (2021) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-021-10183-0 · Cited by 15
Analyzing Argumentation In Rich, Natural Contexts
Reznitskaya, A., & Anderson, R. C. (2008) · Informal Logic · doi:10.22329/il.v26i2.442 · Cited by 15
“In the second set of studies (Dong et al., 2006; Reznitskaya et al., 2007; Reznitskaya et al., 2001), we focused on assessing individual student performance, using such tasks as a persuasive composition and a recall of argumentative text.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citation
Functional relevance of students’ prior knowledge and situational uncertainty during verbal interactions in vocational classrooms: evidence from a mixed-methods study
Kärner, T., & Warwas, J. (2015) · Empirical research in vocational education and training · doi:10.1186/s40461-015-0023-7 · Cited by 16
How teachers might open dialogic spaces in writing instruction
Jesson, R., & Rosedale, N. A. (2016) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2016.08.003 · Cited by 15
Appropriate Appropriation: Functionality of Student Arguments and Support Requests during Small-Group Classroom Discussions
Nussbaum, E. M. (2002) · Journal of Literacy Research · doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3404_5 · Cited by 15
“…blocks of argumentation schema, which – when internalized by students – may play an important role in psychological organization and comprehension of content and in guiding the production of oral and written discourse (see Bensley & Haynes, 1995; Piolat et al., 1999; Reznitskaya et al., 2001).”
Background
Effect of productive discussion on written argumentation in earth science classrooms
Short, R. A., der Eb, M. V., & McKay, S. R. (2020) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.2020.1712314 · Cited by 19
“In a classroom setting, collaborative reasoning discussions have been shown to produce a deeper learning about the role of argumentation (Reznitskaya et al., 2001), increase the quality of reasoning about a topic (Kuhn, Shaw, & Felton, 1997), and “[improve] the quality of the student experience,…”
Background
Historical contextualization in students’ writing
Sendur, K. A., van Drie, J. P., & van Boxtel, C. (2021) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2021.1939029 · Cited by 14
The impact of print exposure quality and inference construction on syllogistic reasoning.
Osana, H. P., Lacroix, G. L., Tucker, B. J., Idan, E., & Jabbour, G. W. (2007) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.888 · Cited by 14
“In fact, Trabasso and Magliano (1996) and Suh (1989) found that a high proportion (anywhere from 70% to 81%) of online utterances made while reading are inferences.”
Background
Beyond Structure: Using the Rational Force Model to Assess Argumentative Writing
Backman, Y., Reznitskaya, A., Gardelli, V., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (2023) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/07410883221148664 · Cited by 13
“Assessments based on structural analysis, including those used in our own studies, typically reward students for producing more of the desired argument elements in their essays (Dong et al., 2008; Erduran et al., 2004; Reznitskaya et al., 2001; Zohar & Nemet, 2002).”
Self-citation
A collaborative small-group discussion approach to improving fifth graders’ use of academic, relational, social, and emotional vocabulary
Hsieh, M., Lin, T., Sallade, R., Ha, S. Y., Kraatz, E., & Shin, S. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101744 · Cited by 13
What Makes a More Proficient Discussion Group in English Language Learners’ Classrooms? Influence of Teacher Talk and Student Backgrounds
Zhang, J., Niu, C., Munawar, S., & Anderson, R. C. (2016) · Research in the Teaching of English · doi:10.58680/rte201628873 · Cited by 13
Self-citation
Learning Through Collaborative Argumentation
Srinivasa, K. G., Kurni, M., & Saritha, K. (2022) · Springer texts in education · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-6734-4_3 · Cited by 16
Effect of argumentative goals in the quality of argumentative dialogue and written argumentation / Efecto de la consigna argumentativa en la calidad del diálogo argumentativo y de la argumentación escrita
Villarroel, C., García-Milà, M., Felton, M. K., & Miralda-Banda, A. (2019) · Journal for the Study of Education and Development Infancia y Aprendizaje · doi:10.1080/02103702.2018.1550162 · Cited by 17
“…que da cuenta de que estos efectos positivos pueden verse bloqueados (Dong et al., 2002; Felton et al., 2009; Felton, Garcia-Mila, Villarroel, & Gilabert, 2015; Gillies &Khan, 2009; Kuhn & Lao, 1996; Reznitskaya et al., 2001), en parte debido a la presencia de una serie de sesgos cognitivos.”
BackgroundInfluential
Performance as Pedagogy: Children’s Trust and the Negotiation of Subjectivities in the Context of Deliberative Dialogue
Hauver, J., Zhao, X., & Kobe, J. F. (2016) · Theory & Research in Social Education · doi:10.1080/00933104.2016.1258349 · Cited by 12
“Relatedly, Reznitskaya et al. (2001), in their study of fifth-graders across six classrooms, found that those who participated in collaborative reasoning discussions produced more sophisticated arguments, counterarguments, and rebuttals, as evidenced in their post-writing, than those who did not.”
Background
Facilitating fourth-grade students’ written argumentation: The use of an argumentation graphic organizer
Wei, L., Firetto, C. M., Murphy, P. K., Li, M., Greene, J. A., & Croninger, R. M. V. (2019) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.2019.1654428 · Cited by 16
“The reality is that students lack well-developed argumentation skills (Graham & Perin, 2007; Reznitskaya et al., 2001) and often ignore evidence contrary to the positions they hold (Wolfe, 2012).”
BackgroundInfluential
Arguing to learn: Supporting interactive argumentation through Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
Munneke, E. L. (2000) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · Cited by 12
Dialogic teacher inquiry: The case of a preservice teacher learning to facilitate class discussion
Sanchez, S. L., & Athanases, S. Z. (2023) · Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education · doi:10.5195/dpj.2023.482 · Cited by 18
“This is particularly true in trust-building and treatment of complex topics (Reznitskaya et al., 2001), including social issues, identities, and personal values (Medina, 2010).”
Background
Development and Validation of an Argumentation based Multimedia Science Learning Environment: Preliminary Findings
Akpınar, Y., Ardaç, D., & Amuce, N. E. (2014) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.853 · Cited by 11
“…provides substantial suggestions to develop interactive learning materials for facilitating meaningful science learning through argumentation (Jonassen & Kim, 2010; Karacapilidis & Papadras 2001; Nussbaum, 2008; Osborne et al., 2004; Reznitskya et al 2001; Weinberger et al., 2010; Yeh & She, 2010).”
Background
ARGUMENTATION IN UNDERGRADUATE CHEMISTRY LABORATORIES
Walker, J. P. (2011) · ProQuest LLC eBooks · Cited by 11
‘It's insanely useful!’ Students’ use of instructional concepts in group work and individual writing
Rødnes, K. A. (2012) · Language and Education · doi:10.1080/09500782.2011.614050 · Cited by 11
“Studies of the transition between collective and individual tasks, as well as between oral and written, show that collaborative reasoning improves literacy skills (e.g. Applebee et al. 2003) and argumentative skills in both oral and written contexts (Reznitskaya et al. 2001, 2009).”
Background
Influence of Collaborative Reasoning discussions on metadiscourse in children’s essays
Latawiec, B. M., Anderson, R. C., Ma, S., & Nguyen‐Jahiel, K. (2016) · Text and Talk · doi:10.1515/text-2016-0002 · Cited by 11
“…local, and thematic coherence (Almasi et al. 2001); greater metacognitive awareness (Almasi et al. 2001); better learning from text (Meyer 1975; Britton et al. 1982); greater rhetorical force of arguments (Reznitskaya et al. 2001); and enhanced social performance and attitude (Crismore 1985).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Developing Argument Skills in Severely Disadvantaged Adolescent Males in a Residential Correctional Setting
Fuccio, M. D., Kuhn, D., Udell, W., & Callender, K. (2009) · Applied Developmental Science · doi:10.1080/10888690802606750 · Cited by 11
“…that the cognitive skills involved in argumentative discourse undergo development with age and practice (Chinn, 2006; Felton, 2004; Felton & Kuhn, 2001; Kuhn & Franklin, 2006; Kuhn & Udell, 2003, 2007; Mason, 1998; Means & Voss, 1996; Reznitskaya et al., 2001; Voss, 2001; Zohar & Nemet, 2002).”
Background
Common Core State Standards and Adaptive Teaching
Kamil, M. L. (2016) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405841.2016.1173991 · Cited by 14
Vers une définition de l’approche intégrée du français
Soucy, E. (2022) · Formation et profession · doi:10.18162/fp.2022.724 · Cited by 10
“Bien que moins nombreuses, d’autres recherches ont aussi établi des liens entre l’oral et la lecture (Kim, 2020 ; Pan et al., 2020) ainsi qu’entre l’oral et l’écriture (Kim et Schatschneider, 2017 ; Reznitskaya et al., 2001 ; Shanahan, 2006).”
Background
Monitoring student progress through their written "point of originality"
Lárusson, J. A., & White, B. (2012) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/2330601.2330653 · Cited by 10
“Overall, having students discuss and/or“argue”about course readings has significant educational utility [5, 4, 38].”
Background
Positively Transforming Classroom Practice Through Dialogic Teaching
Reznitskaya, A., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118996874.ch17 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Do cognitive processes and motives for argumentative writing converge in writer profiles?
Smedt, F. D., Landrieu, Y., Wever, B. D., & Keer, H. V. (2022) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.2022.2122020 · Cited by 11
Identifying Points for Pedagogical Intervention Based on Student Writing: Two Case Studies for the “Point of Originality”
White, B., & Lárusson, J. A. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3305-7_8 · Cited by 9
“Overall, having students discuss and/or “argue” about course readings has significant educational utility (Reznitskaya et al. 2001; Andriessen et al. 2003; Andriessen 2006).”
Background
Come Now, Let Us Reason Together
Dacey, A. (2020) · Informal Logic · doi:10.22329/il.v40i1.6024 · Cited by 11
“For example, students who participate in instructor-facilitated and peerdriven “collaborative reasoning” subsequently write essays containing more arguments and counterarguments than a control condition (Reznitskaya et al. 2001).”
Background
A Systematic Review of Dialogue-Based Teaching Intervention in Chinese Classrooms
Zheng, Y., & Shi, Y. (2025) · ECNU Review of Education · doi:10.1177/20965311241310880 · Cited by 11
“…et al., 1999; Sprod, 1998), greater inferential comprehension of texts (Murphy et al., 2009), enhanced quality of post-intervention argumentative writing (Applebee et al., 2003; Reznitskaya et al., 2001), improved critical-thinking skills and increased classroom engagement (Frijters et al., 2008).”
Reciprocal interactions between teachers’ instructional moves and students’ social reasoning during collaborative small group discussions
Nagpal, M. N., Lin, T., Kraatz, E., Kim, S., Ha, S. Y., & Glassman, M. (2025) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-025-09718-7 · Cited by 10
“This approach has made significant impacts on students’ high-level reasoning (Lin et al., 2015), argumentation (Reznitskaya et al., 2001), reading comprehension (Chinn et al., 2000), and vocabulary knowledge (Zhang et al., 2013).”
Self-citation
A close look at children’s and adolescents’ arguments: combining a developmental, educational, and philosophical perspective
Rapanta, C., Macagno, F., & Jenset, G. B. (2024) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-024-00914-6 · Cited by 6
“Research suggests that as children grow older, they gradually develop a prototypical representation of argumen-tative discourse (or ‘argument schema’, Reznitskaya et al., 2001), which is not fully set until the age of 13 or 14 (Coirier & Golder, 1993).”
Family Interactions with Biodiversity in a Natural History Museum
Patrick, P. G., & Moormann, A. (2021) · Contributions from science education research · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-74266-9_5 · Cited by 8
Integrating dialectical constructivist scaffolding-based argumentation mapping to support students’ dialectical thinking, oral and dialogical argumentation complexity
Darmawansah, D., Hwang, G., & Lin, C.-J. (2024) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-024-10395-5 · Cited by 6
“This approach involves delivering reasoning through dialogues, making it appropriate for socio-dialogical settings (Kuhn, 2018; Reznitskaya et al., 2001).”
Maieutic frame presence and quantity and quality of argumentation in a Paideia seminar
Orellana, P. (2019) · Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · doi:10.17615/gfbh-ra86 · Cited by 6
Arguing for Teachers and for Friends: Eighth-graders’ Sensitivity to Argumentation Features When Judging and Revising Persuasive Essays
HSIN, L. B., & Snow, C. E. (2020) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/0163853x.2020.1803032 · Cited by 6
Efectos evolutivos y contextuales en la adopción de perspectivas y en la argumentación escrita
Correa, N., Vacas, E. M. C., Correa, A.-D., & Batista, L. M. (2003) · Culture and Education · doi:10.1174/113564003322712929 · Cited by 6
“Algo similar se observa en el estudio realizado por Reznitskaya et al. (2001), quienes ensayaron las habilidades argumentativas en debates de razonamiento colaborativo entre iguales y comprobaron cómo los textos elaborados después individualmente aumentaban en número de argumentos, contraargumentos…”
Background
The opportunities to build on existing expertise in writing classrooms: a study of writing lessons in New Zealand primary schools
Jesson, R., & Cockle, V. (2014) · Education 3-13 · doi:10.1080/03004279.2014.923479 · Cited by 6
“No instances were observed of storytelling as a precursor to narrative, for example, or of oral argumentation as developing routines for written argumentation (Reznitskaya et al. 2001).”
Background
The development of children's argument skills
Macedo, A. (2011) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · Cited by 6
The teacher's role in the establishment of whole-class dialogue in a fifth grade science classroom using argument-based inquiry
Benus, M. J. (2011) · doi:10.17077/etd.hpphl9b8 · Cited by 6
“Studies by Reznitskaya et al. (2001) and Rivard and Straw (2000) examined both talk and writing in the classroom setting and concluded that opportunities to talk before writing generally improved the quality of a student’s written response.”
Background
Malaysian ESL Students’ Perception of the Importance Learning Argumentative Writing and Challenges Faced
Khairuddin, Z., Sabri, S., Johan, S. J. A., Daud, K. M., & Bahrn, F. F. S. (2021) · International Journal of Asian Social Science · doi:10.18488/journal.1.2021.1112.553.563 · Cited by 5
Fostering Civic Reasoning Through Disciplinary Literacy
Zhang, J., Lee, G., Iluore, A. C., Relyea, J. E., & Wui, M. G. L. (2022) · The Reading Teacher · doi:10.1002/trtr.2143 · Cited by 5
The Linguistic Challenge of the Transition to Secondary School
Deignan, A., Çandarlı, D., & Oxley, F. A. R. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003081890 · Cited by 5
Group Argumentation Development through Philosophical Dialogues for Persons with Acquired Brain Injuries
Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V., & Strömberg, C. (2019) · International Journal of Disability Development and Education · doi:10.1080/1034912x.2019.1681377 · Cited by 5
“Engagement in argumentation is a means to further reasoning abilities (cf. Reznitskaya et al., 2001), and some (e.g. Mercier, 2016) even claim that ‘the main function of reasoning is to exchange arguments with others’ (p. 689).”
Background
The limitations of conducting collaborative argumentation when teaching argumentative essays in Malaysian secondary schools
Bahari, A. A., Kussin, H. J., Harun, R. N. S. R., Mohamed, M. H., & Jobar, N. A. (2021) · Studies in English Language and Education · doi:10.24815/siele.v8i3.19287 · Cited by 5
“Most argumentation studies (Alagoz, 2013; Anderson et al., 2001; Crowell & Kuhn, 2014; Reznitskaya et al., 2001) were inspired by the notion proposed by Vygotsky to teach argumentation skills.”
BackgroundInfluential
Advancing Civics-specific Disciplinary Writing in the Elementary Grades issue
Enright, E. A., Toledo, W., & Wright, K. L. (2023) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2023.15.01.03 · Cited by 5
Improving Secondary School Students’ Achievement In English Essay Writing Using Two Modes Of Essay Structure-Based Instructional Strategies
Ezeokoli, F. O., & Igubor, P. (2016) · International Journal for Innovation Education and Research · doi:10.31686/ijier.vol4.iss7.563 · Cited by 5
Use of Web 2.0 and Mobile Technologies for Developing Argumentative Skills
Gwee, S., & Damodaran, S. (2015) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25684-9_10 · Cited by 5
Teaching Academic Argument in an Urban Middle School: A Case Study of Two Approaches
Coker, D. L., & Erwin, E. (2011) · Urban Education · doi:10.1177/0042085910377426 · Cited by 9
Putting Students Front and Center in the Hebrew Bible Classroom: Inquiry-Oriented Pedagogy in the Orthodox and Liberal Classroom
Hassenfeld, Z. R. (2018) · Journal of Jewish Education · doi:10.1080/15244113.2018.1418104 · Cited by 4
The Epidemic Effect of Scaffolding Argumentation in Small Groups to Whole-Class Teacher-Led Argumentation
Schwarz, B. B., Cohen, I., & Ophir, Y. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59084-4_5 · Cited by 5
Identifying General Cognitive Abilities Involved in Argument Comprehension and Evaluation
Britt, M. A., Kopp, K. J., Durik, A. M., Blaum, D., & Hastings, P. (2016) · Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie · doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000173 · Cited by 3
“…Anderson, 1998; Chinn, Duschl, Duncan, Buckland, & Pluta, 2008; Goldman, Duschl, Ellenbogen, Williams, & Tzou, 2003; Kuhn & Udell, 2003; Osborne, 2010; Reznitskaya et al., 2001), and efforts to use graphical tools to enhance argumentation skills (Bell, 1998; Dwyer, Hogan, & Stewart, 2012;…”
Studying Sacred Texts as a Pathway to Positive Youth Development: Middle School Students Read Hebrew Bible
Hassenfeld, Z. R. (2019) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel10060379 · Cited by 3
Comprensión y producción de argumentación escrita en estudiantes de educación primaria
Freire, P., Larrain, A. S., Verdugo, S., Gómez, M., & Grau, V. (2020) · Cogency · doi:10.32995/cogency.v12i1.323 · Cited by 3
Academic language and the school transition
Deignan, A. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003081890-2 · Cited by 3
Argument-based teaching
Rapanta, C. (2024) · Educação Sociedade & Culturas · doi:10.24840/esc.vi67.741 · Cited by 11
Examining Argument Elements and Logical Fallacies of English Education Students in Oral Discussion
Hasibuan, S. H., Yusriati, Y., & Manurung, I. D. (2020) · Tell Teaching of English Language and Literature Journal · doi:10.30651/tell.v8i2.5771 · Cited by 3
The Role of Teacher And Peer in Helping the Students Orally Participate in An EFL Classroom
Ardianti, T. M. (2017) · Journal of Foreign Languange Teaching and Learning · doi:10.18196/ftl.2222 · Cited by 3
The Role of the Teacher in Supporting Students’ Epistemic Thinking in Dialogic Argumentation. A Case Study
Švaříček, R. (2019) · Studia paedagogica · doi:10.5817/sp2019-4-7 · Cited by 3
“The unique personal motivation of each student can thus be challenged not only by the fact that creating arguments is cognitively demanding, but also by the requirement for students to respect the shared norms of their social context when producing their arguments (Reznitskaya et al., 2001).”
BackgroundInfluential
Making Use of the Dual Functions of Evidence in Adolescents' Argumentation
Khait, V. (2014) · doi:10.7916/d8t72fm3 · Cited by 3
“Still other research shows that following collaborative reasoning, student essays increased in argument relevancy, counterargument and other aspects of effective persuasive writing (Reznitskaya et al., 2001).”
Background
Evaluation of primary school teachers’ exemplar-based linguistic communication based on structured observation
Uibu, K., Padrik, M., & Tenjes, S. (2016) · Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri = Estonian Journal of Education · doi:10.12697/eha.2016.4.1.08 · Cited by 3
Pursuing Fluency: A Curricular Intervention in Tanakh Education
Hassenfeld, Z. R. (2019) · Journal of Jewish Education · doi:10.1080/15244113.2019.1639117 · Cited by 3
“Many literacy scholars advocate text discussion that prioritizes students’ textual inquiry (Aukerman, 2006, 2007, 2008; Aukerman & Chambers Schuldt, 2015; Chinn et al., 2001; Eeds & Wells, 1989; Lewis, 1993; Paley, 1986; Reznitskaya et al., 2001).”
Background
Leveraging adolescents' multimodal literacies to promote dialogic discussions of literature in one secondary English classroom
Chisholm, J. S. (2010) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 3
Frontline Learning Research
Andiliou, A., & Murphy, P. K. (2014) · Frontline Learning Research · doi:10.14786/flr.v2i2.87 · Cited by 3
Pedagogical efficacy of argument visualization tools
Niu, H. (2016) · Summit (Simon Fraser University) · Cited by 3

Authors: Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R. C., McNurlen, B., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Archodidou, A., & Kim, S.-Y.
ORCID: Reznitskaya, Alina
Venue: Discourse Processes
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Published: 2001-11
Volume: 32
Issue: 2-3
Pages: 155-175
ISSN: 0163-853X (ISSN-L)
1532-6950
DOI: 10.1080/0163853x.2001.9651596
OpenAlex: W2062614287
Cited by: 271
References: 45
Citations by year: 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
FWCI: 6.07
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Discourse Processes (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Social Sciences › Education › Linguistics and Education Research
Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords: oral argumentation, collaborative reasoning, argumentative writing, argumentation, dialogical reasoning, classroom discussion, counterargument, rebuttal, writing development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Influence of Oral Discussion on Written Argument

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks