Cited by 271Educational Strategies and EpistemologiesLinguistics and Education ResearchInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of Oral Discussion on Written Argument

Reznitskaya, Alina, Anderson, Richard C., McNurlen, Brian, Nguyen-Jahiel, Kim, Archodidou, Anthi, Kim, So-young·2001·Discourse Processes

DOI 10.1080/0163853x.2001.9651596

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article examines the effects of participation in oral argumentation on the development of individual reasoning as expressed in persuasive essays. Engagement in oral argumentation is the essential feature of a classroom discussion method called collaborative reasoning. A premise of this method is that reasoning is fundamentally dialogical and, hence, the development of reasoning is best nurtured in supportive dialogical settings such as group discussion. Students from 3 classrooms participated in collaborative reasoning discussions for a period of 5 weeks. Then, these students and students from 3 comparable classrooms who had not engaged in collaborative reasoning wrote persuasive essays. The essays of collaborative reasoning students contained a significantly greater number of relevant arguments, counter-arguments, rebuttals, formal argument devices, and uses of text information.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0163853x.2001.9651596

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Speech Genres and Other Late Essays
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986) · University of Texas Press eBooks · doi:10.7560/720466 · Cited by 9,079
A power primer.
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771
The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays
Wasiolek, E., Bakhtin, M. M., Holquist, M., & Emerson, C. G. (1982) · Comparative Literature · doi:10.2307/1770763 · Cited by 7,540
Handbook of reading research
Pearson, P. D., Barr, (. E., Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. B., & Barr, R. (1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5764 · Cited by 6,850
Multiple regression in behavioral research
Kerlinger, F. N., & Pedhazur, E. J. (1973) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,919
Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning
Cazden, C. B. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,045
Eliciting Self‐Explanations Improves Understanding
Michelene, T. H., Leeuw, N. D., Chiu, M., & Lavancher, C. (1994) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/0364-0213(94)90016-7 · Cited by 2,492
The Skills of Argument
Kuhn, D. (1991) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571350 · Cited by 2,094
Pragmatic reasoning schemas
Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (1985) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(85)90014-3 · Cited by 1,463
A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension
Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524513.007 · Cited by 1,207
Self-citation

Show all 45 references

Sorted by citations

Items 201–271 of 271

Fostering argumentation with online learning systems in higher education
Haro, A. V. (2022) · doi:10.18174/569585 · Cited by 4
Evidence‐based reasoning: Results from an intervention
Du, H., & List, A. (2024) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4238 · Cited by 2
A Dialogic Approach to Enhancing Argumentative Writing From Multiple Texts
Shi, Y., & Iordanou, K. (2025) · ECNU Review of Education · doi:10.1177/20965311241310884 · Cited by 2
“…challenging aspect of integrating arguments both consistent and inconsistent with one ’ s position (Graham & Perin, 2007; Nussbaum & Schraw, 2007; Reznitskaya et al., 2001; Wolfe, 2011) in writing appeared much later and to a lesser extent, continued participation in the AWM curriculum…”
The Effect of Collaborative Reasoning On Indonesian University Students’ Literacy and Argumentation Skills
Parlindungan, F., Mursyidin, Kurniasih, Rahmatillah, R., Nuthihar, R., & Oussou, S. (2023) · JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies) · doi:10.30762/jeels.v10i1.788 · Cited by 7
The Effectiveness of Dialogical Argumentation in Supporting Low-Level EAP Learners’ Evidence-Based Writing: A Longitudinal Study
He, H., & Du, Y. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-63638-7_3 · Cited by 2
Learning Environment for Undergraduates to Enhance Spontaneous Growth of Communication Skills : Effects of group size
Tomida, E., Mizukami, E., Morimoto, I., & Otsuka, H. (2010) · Educational technology research · doi:10.15077/etr.kj00006713272 · Cited by 2
Accelerating writing achievement
Jesson, R. (2013) · set Research Information for Teachers · doi:10.18296/set.0341 · Cited by 2
“We know, for example, from such studies as Collaborative Reasoning (Anderson et al., 1997; Reznitskaya et al., 2001), that students’ oral participation in purpose-based activities builds expertise which can be capitalised on for writing.”
Background
Expert teacher contributions to argumentation quality during inquiry dialogue
Oyler, J. (2015) · Cited by 2
The Role of Dialogue-Based Ethical Inquiry in Educating for a Just Democracy: An Intervention Study
Collins, C. (2007) · Cited by 2
An experiment of audience awareness effects on college students' argumentative writing
Wang, S. (2016) · Lincoln (University of Nebraska) · Cited by 2
Checking, highlighting, adding and ticking off: Year 6 students’ understandings of and responses to the use of goals in the New Zealand writing classroom
Eltringham, K., Hawe, E. M., & Dixon, H. R. (2017) · Education 3-13 · doi:10.1080/03004279.2017.1379549 · Cited by 2
“One way of helping students develop an understanding of this type of writing is through participation in rhetorically similar practices such as collaborative oral argumentation (Reznitskaya et al. 2001).”
Background
Student‐Centered Routines for Analytic Writing Online and “In Person”
Matsumura, L. C., Sandora, C., DeMartino, S., & Zook‐Howell, D. (2021) · The Reading Teacher · doi:10.1002/trtr.2049 · Cited by 3
Leitura argumentativa na escola: propostas didáticas fundadas na perspectiva interacional da argumentação
de Azevedo, I. C. M., Reis, L. R., & Monte, N. S. (2021) · Linha D Água · doi:10.11606/issn.2236-4242.v34i3p108-131 · Cited by 2
Arguing with peers: examining two kinds of discourse and their cognitive benefits
Shaenfield, D. E. (2010) · International Conference of Learning Sciences · Cited by 2
The effect of classroom discourse on high school students' argumentative writing skills
Sineath, K. D. (2014) · Digital Repository Service (Northeastern University) · doi:10.17760/d20005052 · Cited by 2
Fostering Elementary School Students’ Arguments Related to Knowledge Building :
Sakamoto, M., Yamaguchi, E., Inagaki, S., Oshima, J., Oshima, R., Murayama, I., Nakayama, H., Takenaka, M., YAMAMOTO, T., Fujimoto, M., et al. (2010) · The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.5926/jjep.58.95 · Cited by 2
Exploring Pre-University Students’ Construction of Reasoned Argumentation during Computer - Supported Collaborative Discussions Using Sequential Analysis
Selvam, P. P., & Ma’rof, A. M. (2021) · Pertanika journal of science & technology · doi:10.47836/pjssh.29.s1.17 · Cited by 1
The Central Role of Active Learning in University Education: with Special Reference to Content Courses The Central Role of Active Learning in University Education: with Special Reference to Content Courses
Al-Balushi, R. (2023) · Journal of Arts and Social Sciences [JASS] · doi:10.53542/jass.v14i1.5944 · Cited by 1
Using the Seminar Format to Explore Pre-service Teachers’ Argumentative Abilities in English as a Foreign Language
Orellana, P. (2015) · GiST Education and Learning Research Journal · doi:10.26817/16925777.267 · Cited by 1
Assessing Argumentative Representation with Bayesian Network Models in Debatable Social Issues
Zhang, Z., & Lu, J. (2014) · International Education Studies · doi:10.5539/ies.v7n11p120 · Cited by 1
“Studies indicate that argumentative skills have not been sufficiently developed in secondary schools (Kuhn, 1991) and that students have difficulty grasping the gist of argumentative structure and skills from argumentative discourse (Reznitskaya et al., 2001; Stein & Bernas, 1999).”
Background
Una teoría balance de la sabiduría
Sternberg, R. J. (2012) · Persona · doi:10.26439/persona2012.n015.125 · Cited by 2
“…la efectividad de las discusiones de los estudiantes para el desarrollo del pensamiento dialógico, demuestran mejora en la habilidad de los estudiantes para resolver problemas mal estructurados después de su participación en las discusiones (Kuhn, Shaw, & Felton, 1997; Reznitskaya et al., 2001).”
Background
Features of dialogic instruction in upper elementary classrooms and their relationships to student reading comprehension
Michener, C. J. (2014) · Cited by 1
Strengthening dialogic argument: What teachers can learn from authentic examples of student dialogue
Sowey, M. (2018) · Journal of Philosophy in Schools · doi:10.21913/jps.v5i2.1526 · Cited by 1
Peer Exclusion: a Social Convention or Moral Decision? Cross-Cultural Insights into Students’ Social Reasoning
Ha, S. Y., Lin, T., Li, W., Kraatz, E., Chiu, Y., Hong, Y.-R., Tsai, C., & Glassman, M. (2020) · Journal of Cognition and Culture · doi:10.1163/15685373-12340078 · Cited by 1
Student uptake of whole class instructional talking points in their writing
Boyd, M. P., & Veenis, J. C. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101890 · Cited by 2
Challenges for Preservice Teachers in Learning to Lead Discussions: Inquiry in Diverse Classrooms
Athanases, S. Z. (2019) · American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting (AERA) · doi:10.3102/1446638 · Cited by 2
La Discusión Grupal y el Marco Mayéutico como Contextos para el Desarrollo de Habilidades Argumentativas
Orellana, P. (2016) · Revista de Estudios y Experiencias en Educación · doi:10.21703/rexe.20162855703 · Cited by 1
“…que se concluye que, cuando los estudiantes participan en discusiones de carácter más dialógico, la calidad de su argumentación en trabajos escritos y la capacidad para identiicar la estructura de la argumentación mejoran de manera importante (Reznitskaya et al., 2001; Reznitskaya et al., 2007).”
Background
Using Backchanneling Technology to Facilitate Dialogic Discussions about Literature
Chisholm, J. S. (2018) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s2048-045820180000009006 · Cited by 1
Elements of Dialogic Teaching and How to Get Them into Classrooms
Šeďová, K., Šalamounová, Z., Švaříček, R., & Sedláček, M. (2020) · Understanding teaching-learning practice · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-9243-0_2 · Cited by 2
Argumentative Thinking: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Psychology and Argumentation
Rips, L. J. (2009) · Informal Logic · doi:10.22329/il.v29i4.2902 · Cited by 1
Elevers lärande i argumentativa diskussioner om hållbar utveckling
Rudsberg, K. (2014) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · Cited by 1
Arguing on the computer in scientific and non-scientific domains
Iordanou, K., & Kuhn, D. (2009) · Computer-supported collaborative learning/The Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference · doi:10.3115/1600053.1600136 · Cited by 1
How Can I Persuade You? The Development of Audience Awareness in Children's Oral and Written Arguments
Samudra, P. G. (2017) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan) · Cited by 1
Retrieval-based argument mapping promotes learning transfer
Liu, Q. (2020) · Summit (Simon Fraser University) · Cited by 1
Argumentation in web-based collaborative inquiry learning: scripts for writing and scripts for talking aren't the same
Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2008) · International Conference of Learning Sciences
Improving comprehension instuction of literary texts in an elementary-level enrichment program
Klima, J. H. (2014) · Library, Museums and Press - UDSpace (University of Delaware) · doi:10.58088/9h7f-vh98
Title of Document: USING ARGUMENTATIVE DISCUSSIONS TO ENHANCE THE WRITTEN ARGUMENTS OF MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS IN SOCIAL STUDIES CLASSROOMS
Wissinger, D. R. (2012)
Kan elevstyrte gruppediskusjoner på mellomtrinnet fremme elevers reflekterende ferdigheter og tekstforståelse? Et Systematisk Review av metoden Collaborative Reasoning
Kirkerud, T. (2014) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
The Effect of Audience Type on Written Argumentation
Gibson, C. (2011) · Huskie Commons (Northern Illinois University)
Learning how to use evidence in argumentation
Hemberger, L. (2016) · doi:10.7916/d8qj7h9z
How Construction of a Dialog Influences Argumentive Writing and Epistemological Understanding
Zavala, J. (2016) · doi:10.7916/d8x92b9f
“been found to enhance students’ argumentive writing with respect to addressing their own position in a framework of alternatives (Kuhn & Crowell, 2011; Reznitskaya et al., 2001).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Developing University Students’ Argumentative Discourse: An Ill-Structured Issue Pertaining To Black African Immigrants And African Americans
Olojo-Adeoye, O. O. (2016) · Human Biology
Multiperspectivistic management of discourse in oral argumentation in academic settings / Gestión multiperspectivista del discurso en la argumentación oral en contextos académicos
Hernández, J. A. R., Correa, N., & Vacas, E. M. C. (2016) · Journal for the Study of Education and Development Infancia y Aprendizaje · doi:10.1080/02103702.2016.1189121
“Along similar lines, Gélat (2003) and Reznitskaya et al. (2001) indicated that argumentative texts were notably improved when a previous in-class debate, clearly setting out the perspectives, was held.”
Background
Designing Standards-Driven Curriculum to Support
Goss, M., Min, H. H., & Strohl, C. (2016) · SensePublishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6300-405-3_3
COLL AB OR AT IVE RE AS ON IN G
Zhang, J., & Stahl, K. A. D. (2011)
Text-Based Discussions: Lessons Learned from One Fifth Grade Classroom.
Pendleton, M. (2014) · NCSU Libraries Repository (North Carolina State University Libraries)
The Development of English Learners as Writers of Opinion Pieces
Squire, A. A. (2021) · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) · doi:10.26076/5199-1b6b
"Doing" Close Reading: Investigating Text Complexity and Text Difficulty in the Secondary English Language Arts Context
Budd, J. S. (2015) · doi:10.7916/d8t72gcc
How do children with reading difficulties learn to read in first class
Tierman, B. (2009) · Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology)
Joint Reflection Promotes Students’ Use of Evidence in Argumentive Writing
Shi, Y. (2018) · doi:10.7916/d8ks88b2
Talking to Learn: Investigating the Relationship Between Classroom Discussion and Persuasive Writing
Al‐Adeimi, S. (2018) · Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University)
Examining Longitudinal Change in Student Talk in Small-group Literature Discussions
Hendrick, B. D. (2017) · Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · doi:10.17615/pmd3-1c51
Reflective Practices That Scaffold Teacher Knowledge, Decision Making, and Literacy Leadership
Fullerton, S. K., & Aker, L. D. (2019) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-0206-8.ch010
Promoting Students' Understanding of Argumentation in Multiple Texts
Borlaug, P. M. K. (2019) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
Habilidades de negociación y cálculo de riesgo-beneficio en una muestra de trabajadoras sexuales colombianas
Klimenko, O., Molina, D. M. C., Ospina, A. T., & Ochoa, M. T. (2020) · Revista de Psicología y Ciencias del Comportamiento de la Unidad Académica de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales · doi:10.29059/rpcc.20200617-110
The Effects of Planning Time Conditions and Writing Type on the Metacognitive Strategies of Iranian EFL Learners
Pourghasemian, H., & Mozaheb, M. A. (2020) · doi:10.22034/iepa.2020.239009.1186
“Reznitskaya et al. (2001) also believed that arguments strengthen the ability of the mind to choose between competing views and to generate new ideas and notions.”
Background
A Quasi-experimental Study of the Relationship Between Teaching Intensive Reading Using Novels and Student Skills in English Language Arts
Brevoort, S. (2021) · Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research
OPENING CLASSROOMS: INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICES AND STUDENT EXPERIENCE AS PREDICTORS OF OPEN CLASSROOM CLIMATE FOR DISCUSSION
Siegel-Stechler, K. (2021)
DiaLog – Schüler_innen diskutieren kontroverse Fragen zum Klimawandel. Förderung schriftlicher Argumentationsfähigkeiten in der Erst-, Zweit- und Fremdsprache Deutsch
Reinsperger, V., Ehrig, B.-K., Ehrenmüller, J., Schicker, S., Akbulut, M., & Schmölzer-Eibinger, S. (2022) · ÖDaF-Mitteilungen · doi:10.14220/odaf.2022.38.1.160
Improving Early Adolescents' Argumentative Writing Through Dialogic Inquiry of Socioscientific Issues
Zhang, J. (2019) · American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting (AERA) · doi:10.3102/1443140
مجلة ديسمبر 2013 العدد 27
(2013) · Mağallaẗ Kulliyyaẗ Al-Tarbiyyaẗ - Aswān/Mağallaẗ Kulliyyaẗ Al-Tarbiyyaẗ - Aswān · doi:10.21608/mkts.2013.233842
The Effects of Classroom Participation Strategies on Students’ Learning Outcome in English
Rai, H. (2022) · Contemporary Education and Teaching Research · doi:10.47852/bonviewcetr2022030305 · Cited by 3
فاعلية وحدة مقترحة قائمة على نظرية الذكاء الناجح في تنمية مهارات الحجاج لدى طالبات المرحلة الثانوية
مصطفي, ر. م. ا. (2023) · Maǧallaẗ Kulliyyaẗ Al-Tarbiyyaẗ Bil-Manṣūraẗ · doi:10.21608/maed.2023.352599
Opportunities to Learn and Intersubjectivity
Snow, C. E., & Lawrence, J. F. (2024) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197605424.003.0011
Diyalojik Öğretim Konusunda Yapılan Bilimsel Araştırmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi
Yüceer, D. (2024) · Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.37217/tebd.1450991
Persuasion versus deliberation: discourse patterns in children’s argumentative dialogues
Shi, Y. (2026) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/0163853x.2026.2661242
“The present study extends Shi (2024) by showing that dialogic exchange acts as a bridge to support individual writing (Al-Adeimi, 2025; Kuhn, 2025; Reznitskaya et al., 2001; Shi et al., 2019).”
Culturally Compelling Genre Teaching
Hinchman, K. A., & Boyd, F. B. (2015) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-68123-241-620251016
L'argumentation sur des questions socio-scientifiques : l'influence des contextes culturels dans la prise de décisions
Gutiérrez-Romero, M. F. (2016) · doi:10.70675/02849710z9d93z48eaza501zb5ddd3145a99
“Reznitskaya et al, (2001) ont montré que l'argumentation orale stimule effectivement le raisonnement”
Background
Does Collaborative Discussion About Text Really Improve Students’ Reading Comprehension Abilities? In Search of Transfer
Wilkinson, I. A. G., D’Agostino, J. V., Purwaningrum, D., & Stephany, K. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-5997-8_12
Developing Young Learners’ Talk and Thinking Skills for Group Discussions
Goh, C. C. M. (2026) · English language education · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-7526-8_16
Cross-cultural Study of American and Korean Students’ Reflective Essays and Collaborative Literature Discussions
Kim, I., Anderson, R. C., Miller, B., Jeong, J., & Swim, T. J. (2009) · Opus: Research & Creativity (Indiana University – Purdue University Fort Wayne)
Self-citation

Authors: Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R. C., McNurlen, B., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Archodidou, A., & Kim, S.-Y.
ORCID: Reznitskaya, Alina
Venue: Discourse Processes
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Published: 2001-11
Volume: 32
Issue: 2-3
Pages: 155-175
ISSN: 0163-853X (ISSN-L)
1532-6950
DOI: 10.1080/0163853x.2001.9651596
OpenAlex: W2062614287
Cited by: 271
References: 45
Citations by year: 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
FWCI: 6.07
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Discourse Processes (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Social Sciences › Education › Linguistics and Education Research
Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords: oral argumentation, collaborative reasoning, argumentative writing, argumentation, dialogical reasoning, classroom discussion, counterargument, rebuttal, writing development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Influence of Oral Discussion on Written Argument

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks