The DOI matches its Crossref record; 176 of the 178 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The DIVA model: A neural theory of speech acquisition and production
Open accessAbstract
The DIVA model of speech production provides a computationally and neuroanatomically explicit account of the network of brain regions involved in speech acquisition and production. An overview of the model is provided along with descriptions of the computations performed in the different brain regions represented in the model. The latest version of the model, which contains a new right-lateralised feedback control map in ventral premotor cortex, will be described, and experimental results that motivated this new model component will be discussed. Application of the model to the study and treatment of communication disorders will also be briefly described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“These results suggest that inner speech production is associated with a time-locked and content-specific internal forward model, similar to the one that operates in the production of overt speech.”
From Neurophysiological evidence of efference copies to inner speech (2017) · cites this paper as Tourville and Guenther, 2011
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The lack of convergence in L-IFG is of interest as it is invariably a part of the corollary discharge network according to computational and neuroanatomical models of speech production (Chen et al., 2011; Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
From Bridging phenomenology and neural mechanisms of inner speech: ALE meta-analysis on egocentricity and spontaneity in a dual-mechanistic framework (2023) · cites this paper as Tourville & Guenther, 2011
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal
Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., & Oeltermann, A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35084005 · Cited by 6,551
A theory of lexical access in speech production
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99001776 · Cited by 5,295 · cited 2×
“Similarly, comparisons of auditory responses during self-produced speech and while listening to recordings of one’s own speech indicate attenuation of auditory cortex responses during speech production (Curio, Neuloh, Numminen, Jousmaki, & Hari, 2000; Heinks-Maldonado, Mathalon, Gray, & Ford, 2005;…”
Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0 · Cited by 4,870 · cited 1×
“1 Performance of these motor programs relies on contributions from bilateral premotor, motor, and subcortical regions (see below), areas that are active bilaterally during normal speech production.”
Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation.
Kwong, K. K., Belliveau, J. W., Chesler, D. A., Goldberg, I. E., Weisskoff, R. M., Poncelet, B. P., Kennedy, D. N., Hoppel, B. E., Cohen, M. S., & Turner, R. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.12.5675 · Cited by 4,212 · cited 2×
“Blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI; Belliveau et al., 1992; Kwong et al., 1992; Ogawa et al.,”
Editorial Office (1997) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1381/096089297765555359 · Cited by 3,941
Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study
di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00230027 · Cited by 3,539
A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.
Dell, G. S. (1986) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.93.3.283 · Cited by 3,236 · cited 2×
“Similarly, comparisons of auditory responses during self-produced speech and while listening to recordings of one’s own speech indicate attenuation of auditory cortex responses during speech production (Curio, Neuloh, Numminen, Jousmaki, & Hari, 2000; Heinks-Maldonado, Mathalon, Gray, & Ford, 2005;…”
Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01260-0 · Cited by 2,858 · cited 2×
“1 Performance of these motor programs relies on contributions from bilateral premotor, motor, and subcortical regions (see below), areas that are active bilaterally during normal speech production.”
Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.
Kawato, M. (1999) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(99)00028-8 · Cited by 2,685 · cited 5×
“This mapping from desired sensory outcome to the appropriate motor action is an inverse kinematic transformation and is often referred to as an inverse model (e.g., Kawato, 1999; Wolpert & Kawato, 1998).”
InfluentialCortical mechanisms of human imitation
Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5449.2526 · Cited by 2,683 · cited 1×
“Evidence of mirror neurons in humans has implicated left precentral gyrus for grasping actions (Tai, Scherfler, Brooks, Sawamoto, & Castiello, 2004), and left opercular inferior frontal gyrus for finger movements (Iacoboni et al., 1999).”
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- 10.1016/0166-2236(95)93872-U · DOI
- Bays P. M., 2006, Public Library of Science Biology, 4, e28
- Bohland J. W., Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283 · DOI · Paper page
- Ghosh S. S., 2003, Neuroimage, 19, S57
- Lehiste I., 1970, Suprasegmentals
- Maeda S., 1990, Speech production and speech modeling
- McNeil M. R., 2007, Apraxia of speech: Definition and differential diagnosis
- Robin , D. A. , Guenther , F. H. , Narayana , S. , Jacks , A. , Tourville , J. A. , Ramage , A. E. , et al. 2008 . A transcranial magnetic stimulation virtual lesion study of speech . Proceedings of the Conference on Motor Speech, Monterey, California .
- Shriberg L. D., 1982, Clinical phonetics
- Terband , H. , Maassen , B. , Brumberg , J. & Guenther , F. H. 2008 . A transcranial magnetic stimulation virtual lesion study of speech . Proceedings of the Conference on Motor Speech, Monterey, California .
- Wambaugh J. L., 2006, Journal of Medical Speech–Language Pathology, 14, Xxxv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 747
Structural brain differences in school-age children with residual speech sound errors
Preston, J. L., Molfese, P. J., Mencl, W. E., Frost, S. J., Hoeft, F., Fulbright, R. K., Landi, N., Grigorenko, E. L., Seki, A., Felsenfeld, S., et al. (2013) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.11.001 · Cited by 45
McGettigan, C., Eisner, F., Agnew, Z. K., Manly, T., Wisbey, D., & Scott, S. K. (2013) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00427 · Cited by 39
“Interrogating the neural systems supporting vocal modulation is an important step in understanding human vocal expression, yet this dynamic aspect of the voice is a missing element in existing models of speech production (Hickok, 2012; Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
InfluentialSeparation of trait and state in stuttering
Connally, E. L., Ward, D., Pliatsikas, C., Finnegan, S., Jenkinson, M., Boyles, R., & Watkins, K. E. (2018) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24063 · Cited by 35
“The auditory cortex receives external feedback and is thought to contain target and error maps used to update internal speech plans (Guenther & Ghosh, 2003; Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
A Spatiotemporal Map of Reading Aloud
Woolnough, O., Donos, C., Curtis, A., Rollo, P. S., Roccaforte, Z. J., Dehaene, S., Fischer‐Baum, S., & Tandon, N. (2022) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2324-21.2022 · Cited by 37
Articulatory movements modulate auditory responses to speech.
Agnew, Z. K., McGettigan, C., Banks, B., & Scott, S. K. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.020 · Cited by 36
“In current models of speech production, no such distinction is made within the superior temporal cortex (Hickok, 2012; Tourville and Guenther, 2011).”
BackgroundResultPatel, S. P., Kim, J. H., Larson, C. R., & Losh, M. (2019) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.2156 · Cited by 34
“Any mismatch between the auditory feedback and internal models lead to revision of the motor plan to correct for the error [Guenther, 1994; Guenther et al., 1998; Tourville & Guenther, 2011].”
BackgroundAuditory Attentional Set-Shifting and Inhibition in Children Who Stutter
Eggers, K., & Jansson-Verkasalo, E. M. (2017) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2017_jslhr-s-16-0096 · Cited by 37
Broadfoot, C. K., Abur, D., Hoffmeister, J. D., Stepp, C. E., & Ciucci, M. R. (2019) · Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups · doi:10.1044/2019_pers-sig3-2019-0001 · Cited by 34
“Speech is also affected by the integration of sensory information through auditory feedback (how self-produced speech sounds to a speaker; Houde & Nagarajan, 2011; Tourville & Guenther, 2011; Villacorta, Perkell, & Guenther, 2007), which may also be impacted by PD.”
BackgroundGick, B., & Stavness, I. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00977 · Cited by 33
“Subsequent speech researchers have taken this lead, focusing on developing models of control space (e.g., Kelso et al., 1986a; Tourville and Guenther, 2011), with little or no attention given to modeling the neurophysiology of embod-ied speech.”
BackgroundBehavioral, computational, and neuroimaging studies of acquired apraxia of speech
Ballard, K. J., Tourville, J. A., & Robin, D. A. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00892 · Cited by 36
Self-citationRelationships between vocal pitch perception and production: a developmental perspective
Murray, E. S. H., & Stepp, C. E. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-60756-2 · Cited by 33
Speech dysfunction, cognition, and Parkinson's disease
Rohl, A., Gutierrez, S., Johari, K., Greenlee, J. D. W., Tjaden, K., & Roberts, A. (2022) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2022.01.017 · Cited by 39
Martin, C. D., Niziolek, C. A., Duñabeitia, J. A., Pérez, A., Hernández, D., Carreiras, M., & Houde, J. F. (2018) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00091 · Cited by 35
“The predicted feedback is generated internally from the conjunction of an efference copy of the motor command parameters with an internal model of both the motor system and the environment (“forward models,” see Jordan and Rumelhart, 1992; Guenther, 1995; Wolpert et al., 1995; Perkell et al., 1997; Tremblay et al., 20…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTutorial: Speech Motor Chaining Treatment for School-Age Children With Speech Sound Disorders
Preston, J. L., Leece, M. C., & Storto, J. (2019) · Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools · doi:10.1044/2018_lshss-18-0081 · Cited by 32
“Under the assumption that the goals of accurate speech sound production involve an acoustic target and general movement goals (e.g., Tourville & Guenther, 2011), the SMC procedures involve training speech movement patterns with feedback about both the acoustic quality of speech sounds and the…”
A Review on Treatment-Related Brain Changes in Aphasia
Schevenels, K., Price, C. J., Zink, I., Smedt, B. D., & Vandermosten, M. (2020) · Neurobiology of Language · doi:10.1162/nol_a_00019 · Cited by 32
“However, the SFG, the cerebellum, the precentral gyrus, and the insula are implicated in motor speech (Ackermann & Riecker, 2010; Stegemöller, 2017; Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
BackgroundMeekings, S., & Scott, S. K. (2020) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01661 · Cited by 36
“…control processes, an activation likelihood estimation (ALE) metaanalysis looks for convergence in reported coordinates between studies and compares these with the hypothesized location of error correction regions in the DIVA (Tourville & Guenther, 2011) and HSFC ({Formatting Citation}) models.”
BackgroundResultModels Linking Production and Comprehension
Gambi, C., & Pickering, M. J. (2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118829516.ch7 · Cited by 34
“The HSFC model is closely related to the DIVA/GODIVA model proposed by Guenther and colleagues (see Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDistinct neural systems recruited when speech production is modulated by different masking sounds
Meekings, S., Evans, S., Lavan, N., Boebinger, D., Krieger‐Redwood, K., Cooke, M. P., & Scott, S. K. (2016) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4948587 · Cited by 31
Tractography of supplementary motor area projections in progressive speech apraxia and aphasia
Carbó, A. V., Reid, R. I., Tosakulwong, N., Weigand, S. D., Duffy, J. R., Clark, H. M., Utianski, R. L., Botha, H., Machulda, M. M., Strand, E. A., et al. (2022) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2022.102999 · Cited by 32
“Our findings are also in line with current models of speech production (Tourville and Guenther, 2011) in which SMA contains the initiation area for speech, gating the articulatory commands.”
ResultPredicting Which Children Will Normalize Without Intervention for Speech Sound Disorders
To, C. K. S., McLeod, S. L., Sam, K. L., & Law, T. K. T. (2022) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2022_jslhr-21-00444 · Cited by 35
Franich, K., Wong, H. Y., Yu, A. C. L., & To, C. K. S. (2020) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-020-04758-z · Cited by 30
A single exposure to altered auditory feedback causes observable sensorimotor adaptation in speech
Hantzsch, L., Parrell, B., & Niziolek, C. A. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.73694 · Cited by 30
“In the DIVA (Directions Into Velocities of Articulators) model (Tourville & Guenther, 2011), sensory prediction errors lead to feedback-based corrective motor commands (i.e. the compensation response) which are subsequently incorporated into the feedforward motor program used for future productions…”
MethodKell, C. A., Darquea, M., Behrens, M., Cordani, L., Keller, C., & Fuchs, S. I. (2016) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23398 · Cited by 35
“Because online corrections of auditory or somatosensory feedback perturbations activated right-lateralized premotor cortices in addition to the bilateral auditory or somatosensory cortex activations, the DIVA model proposes a right-lateralized error monitoring system for speech production [Golfinopoulos et al., 2011;…”
ResultInfluentialSegado, M., Zatorre, R. J., & Penhune, V. B. (2021) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118128 · Cited by 29
Phonological Feature Repetition Suppression in the Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus
Okada, K., Matchin, W., & Hickok, G. S. (2018) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01287 · Cited by 30
Nagle, C. (2020) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12431 · Cited by 29
The Role of Sensory Feedback in Developmental Stuttering: A Review
Bradshaw, A. R., Lametti, D. R., & McGettigan, C. (2021) · Neurobiology of Language · doi:10.1162/nol_a_00036 · Cited by 33
Cerebellar and Cortical Correlates of Internal and External Speech Error Monitoring
Runnqvist, E., Chanoine, V., Strijkers, K., Pattamadilok, C., Bonnard, M., Nazarian, B., Sein, J., Anton, J., Dorokhova, L., Belin, P., et al. (2021) · Cerebral Cortex Communications · doi:10.1093/texcom/tgab038 · Cited by 28
Impairment of speech auditory feedback error detection and motor correction in post-stroke aphasia
Sangtian, S., Wang, Y., Fridriksson, J., & Behroozmand, R. (2021) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2021.106163 · Cited by 29
Callan, D. E., Callan, A. M., & Jones, J. A. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00275 · Cited by 36
“PMvi/Broca’s area and the cerebellum are hypothesized to be regions that instantiate the articulatory—auditory models that are involved with both speech production and perception (Callan et al., 2004a; Tourville and Guenther, 2011; Guenther and Vladusich, 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialNeural integration of language production and comprehension
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1417917111 · Cited by 29
Angrick, M., Herff, C., Johnson, G. D., Shih, J. J., Krusienski, D. J., & Schultz, T. (2019) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2018.10.080 · Cited by 28
Weerathunge, H. R., Alzamendi, G. A., Cler, G. J., Guenther, F. H., Stepp, C. E., & Zañartu, M. (2022) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010159 · Cited by 31
“However, the neuromuscular control of laryngeal function is an important aspect of speech production that is not addressed in the DIVA model [25].”
BackgroundSelf-citationLametti, D. R., Quek, M. Y. M., Prescott, C., Brittain, J., & Watkins, K. E. (2020) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-020-01725-8 · Cited by 28
Dissociable Mechanisms of Verbal Working Memory Revealed through Multivariate Lesion Mapping
Ghaleh, M., Lacey, E. H., Fama, M. E., Anbari, Z., DeMarco, A. T., & Turkeltaub, P. E. (2019) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhz259 · Cited by 30
The time‐course of speech perception revealed by temporally‐sensitive neural measures
Getz, L. M., & Toscano, J. C. (2020) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1541 · Cited by 28
ATYPICAL CAUDATE ANATOMY IN CHILDREN WHO STUTTER1,2
Foundas, A. L., Cindass, R., Mock, J. R., & Corey, D. M. (2013) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/15.10.pms.116.2a · Cited by 28
How the conception of control influences our understanding of actions
Floegel, M., Kasper, J., Perrier, P., & Kell, C. A. (2023) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-023-00691-z · Cited by 36
Low-Frequency Oscillations Code Speech during Verbal Working Memory
Gehrig, J., Michalareas, G., Forster, M.-T., Lei, J., Hok, P., Laufs, H., Senft, C., Seifert, V., Schoffelen, J., Hanslmayr, S., et al. (2019) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0018-19.2019 · Cited by 26
“Yet, lesion data indeed propose a modulatory role of frontal cortical areas in speech perception (Hickok and Poeppel, 2007; Murakami et al., 2015) and an important contribution of temporal cortical areas to speech production (Indefrey and Levelt, 2004; Tourville and Guenther, 2011; Hickok, 2012).”
BackgroundPratts, J., Pobric, G., & Yao, B. (2023) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120399 · Cited by 34
“…map which serves as an repository of speech motor programs for each phonemic, syllabic or multi-syllabic sound a speaker might want to produce (Tourville and Guenther, 2011) - with the motor commands contained within each motor program then representing the efference copies which are passed…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAuditory and Somatosensory Interaction in Speech Perception in Children and Adults
Trudeau-Fisette, P., Ito, T., & Ménard, L. (2019) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00344 · Cited by 27
Franken, M. K., Eisner, F., Acheson, D. J., McQueen, J. M., Peter Hagoort, A., & Schoffelen, J. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.061 · Cited by 27
“These models hypothesize the use of internally generated forward models (Houde and Nagarajan, 2011; Tourville and Guenther, 2011).”
InfluentialDegradation of Neuronal Encoding of Speech in the Subthalamic Nucleus in Parkinson's Disease
Tankus, A., & Fried, I. (2018) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1093/neuros/nyy027 · Cited by 26
A Causal Role of the Cerebellum in Auditory Feedback Control of Vocal Production
Peng, D., Lin, Q. M., Chang, Y., Jones, J. A., Jia, G., Chen, X., Liu, P., & Liu, H. (2021) · The Cerebellum · doi:10.1007/s12311-021-01230-1 · Cited by 26
Cross-species parallels in babbling: animals and algorithms
ter Haar, S. M., Fernandez, A. A., Gratier, M., Knörnschild, M., Levelt, C. C., Moore, R. K., Vellema, M., Wang, X., & Oller, D. K. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2020.0239 · Cited by 28
Cummine, J., Cribben, I., Luu, C., Kim, E., Bakhtiari, R., Georgiou, G. K., & Boliek, C. A. (2015) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000236 · Cited by 25
“…contribute to reading processes such as orthography-phonology mapping or speech production processes such as articulatory planning (see e.g., the Directions into Velocities of Articulators [DIVA] model; Guenther, 2006; Guenther & Vladusich, 2012; Tourville & Guenther, 2011) is not entirely clear.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe effects of delayed auditory and visual feedback on speech production
Chesters, J., Baghai-Ravary, L., & Möttönen, R. (2015) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4906266 · Cited by 26
“The auditory state map described by the DIVA model is located in the superior temporal regions (Guenther et al., 2006; Tourville and Guenther, 2011).”
White matter impairment in the speech network of individuals with autism spectrum disorder
Peeva, M. G., Tourville, J. A., Agam, Y., Holland, B., Manoach, D. S., & Guenther, F. H. (2013) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2013.08.011 · Cited by 28
“(DIVA) neurocomputational model of speech production (Golfinopoulos et al., 2010; Guenther et al., 2006; Tourville and Guenther, 2011), left vPMC is the key area involved in translating the phonological content of an intended speech message into articulatory output.”
Self-citationThe Electrophysiology of Basic Phrase Building
Neufeld, C., Kramer, S. E., Lapinskaya, N., Heffner, C. C., Malko, A., & Lau, E. F. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158446 · Cited by 33
Lexical-perceptual integration influences sensorimotor adaptation in speech
Bourguignon, N. J., Baum, S. R., & Shiller, D. M. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00208 · Cited by 28
“…such as the DIVA model Frontiers in Human Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org April 2014 | Volume 8 | Article 208 | 7 (Guenther et al., 2006; Tourville and Guenther, 2011) or the State Feedback Control model of speech motor control (Houde and Nagarajan, 2011), changes in auditory feedback,…”
BackgroundA special role for the right posterior superior temporal sulcus during speech production
Yamamoto, A. K., Jones, Ō. P., Hope, T. M. H., Prejawa, S., Oberhuber, M., Ludersdorfer, P., Yousry, T. A., Green, D. W., & Price, C. J. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116184 · Cited by 25
“RpSTS may therefore serve to ensure that the sounds produced correspond to the sounds intended and to guide the production of subsequent speech (Levelt, 1983; Tourville et al., 2008; Tourville and Guenther, 2011).”
BackgroundSpeech sound categorization: The contribution of non-auditory and auditory cortical regions
Preisig, B. C., Riecke, L., & Hervais‐Adelman, A. (2022) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119375 · Cited by 25
Overby, M. S., Belardi, K., & Schreiber, J. B. (2019) · Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics · doi:10.1080/02699206.2019.1683231 · Cited by 25
“…speech impairment adversely affects an infant’s ability for vocal exploration, the infant then fails to obtain the tactile, proprioceptive, and auditory feedback that create systemic mappings between an articulatory movement and its auditory outcome (Maassen, 2002; Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
BackgroundSpoken Language Development and the Challenge of Skill Integration
Noiray, A., Popescu, A., Killmer, H., Rubertus, E., Krüger, S., & Hintermeier, L. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02777 · Cited by 25
Efficacy of Auditory versus Motor Learning for Skilled and Novice Performers
Brown, R. M., & Penhune, V. B. (2018) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01309 · Cited by 25
Neurological Aspects of Foreign Accent Syndrome in Stroke Patients
Mariën, P., Keulen, S., & Verhoeven, J. (2018) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.12.002 · Cited by 26
Scott, T. L., Haenchen, L., Daliri, A., Chartove, J., Guenther, F. H., & Perrachione, T. K. (2020) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104840 · Cited by 26
“Mismatch between these learned motor representations and auditory feedback is thought to be transformed into compensatory gestures in ventral motor cortex (vMC; Tourville and Guenther, 2011).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationJohnson, L. P., Sangtian, S., Johari, K., Behroozmand, R., & Fridriksson, J. (2020) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2020.106034 · Cited by 24
Musicianship-Related Structural and Functional Cortical Features Are Preserved in Elderly Musicians
Rus-Oswald, O. G., Benner, J., Reinhardt, J., Bürki, C. N., Christiner, M., Hofmann, E., Schneider, P. T., Stippich, C., Kressig, R. W., & Blatow, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2022.807971 · Cited by 25
Moving to the Beat and Singing are Linked in Humans
Bella, S. D., Berkowska, M., & Sowiński, J. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00663 · Cited by 27
“with lyrics and synchronization is that they may both rely on sensorimotor translation mechanisms which are also involved in speech production (Hickok and Poeppel, 2007; Hickok et al., 2011; Tourville and Guenther, 2011).”
BackgroundNeural Development of Speech Sensorimotor Learning
Ohashi, H., & Ostry, D. J. (2021) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2884-20.2021 · Cited by 26
“, 2002), whereas the activity increases during speech with AAF (Tourville and Guenther, 2011; Johnson et al., 2019; Floegel et al., 2020).”
BackgroundInfluentialLi, T., Zhu, X., Wu, X., Gong, Y.-L., Jones, J. A., Liu, P., Chang, Y., Yan, N., Chen, X., & Liu, H. (2022) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhac049 · Cited by 23
Gastaldon, S., Busan, P., Arcara, G., & Peressotti, F. (2023) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhad004 · Cited by 23
Machine learning for MEG during speech tasks
Kostas, D., Pang, E. W., & Rudzicz, F. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-38612-9 · Cited by 22
Functional Parcellation of the Speech Production Cortex
Tourville, J. A., Nieto-Castañón, A., Heyne, M., & Guenther, F. H. (2019) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2019_jslhr-s-csmc7-18-0442 · Cited by 22
“For instance, the arrowhead labeled b in Figure 4 marks the peak of a distinct cluster of activity in left ventral precentral and adjacent posterior inferior frontal cortex, an area hypothesized to encode speech motor commands (Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
BackgroundSelf-citationGarnett, E. O., Chow, H. M., & Chang, S. (2019) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2019_jslhr-s-csmc7-18-0356 · Cited by 22
“…fluent speech involves four major stages, each of which is associated with anatomical components of the speech motor network (Bohland, Bullock, & Guenther, 2010; Guenther, Ghosh, & Tourville, 2006; Hickok, 2012a, 2012b; Hickok & Poeppel, 2007; Houde & Nagarajan, 2011; Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
BackgroundMorphological Development in Robotic Learning: A Survey
Naya-Varela, M., Faíña, A., & Duro, R. J. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems · doi:10.1109/tcds.2021.3052548 · Cited by 22
Overby, M. S., Caspari, S. S., & Schreiber, J. B. (2019) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2019_jslhr-s-18-0046 · Cited by 22
Cognitive Speech Coding: Examining the Impact of Cognitive Speech Processing on Speech Compression
Cerňak, M., Asaei, A., & Hyafil, A. (2018) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2017.2761895 · Cited by 21
“Speech acquisition and production models such as the Directions Into Velocities of Articulators (DIVA) [38] contain auditory feedback and somatosensory (tactile) feedback, for example, if the tip of the tongue has touched correctly the alveolar ridge during the [t] sound production.”
Adaptation to pitch-altered feedback is independent of one’s own voice pitch sensitivity
Alemi, R., Lehmann, A., & Deroche, M. L. D. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-73932-1 · Cited by 21
The role of visual feedback in detecting and correcting typing errors: A signal detection approach
Pinet, S., & Nozari, N. (2020) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2020.104193 · Cited by 20
Auditory Feedback Is Used for Adaptation and Compensation in Speech Timing
Karlin, R. P., Naber, C., & Parrell, B. (2021) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2021_jslhr-21-00021 · Cited by 21
“For example, speech sounds (syllables) in the DIVA model (Guenther, 1995; Tourville & Guenther, 2011) have a fixed duration, with time-varying trajectories that produce the desired formants and articulatory positions; this model explicitly allows the monitoring of spatial/spectral feedback, but not…”
BackgroundParkinson's disease monitoring by biomechanical instability of phonation
Gómez‐Vilda, P., Alonso, D. P., Rodellar, V., Álvarez-Marquina, A., Nieto‐Lluis, V., & Martínez, R. (2017) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2016.06.092 · Cited by 21
Kittilstved, T., Reilly, K. J., Harkrider, A. W., Casenhiser, D. M., Thornton, D. M., Jenson, D. E., Hedinger, T., Bowers, A. L., & Saltuklaroglu, T. (2018) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00126 · Cited by 22
“In addition, other studies have reported evidence of deficits in forward, motor-to-sensory transformations (Daliri et al., 2014; Daliri and Max, 2015) that are critical to error detection and correction in feedback control of speech (Tourville et al., 2008; Tourville and Guenther, 2011).”
BackgroundInfluentialNiziolek, C. A., & Parrell, B. (2021) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2020_jslhr-20-00263 · Cited by 21
Speech production and sensory impairment in mild Parkinson's disease
Chen, Y.-W., & Watson, P. J. (2017) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4980138 · Cited by 22
Park, Y., Perkell, J. S., Matthies, M. L., & Stepp, C. E. (2019) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2019_jslhr-s-19-0048 · Cited by 20
“According to this explanation, people with more acute perception would have auditory targets for speech sounds that are smaller and further apart from one another than people with less acute perception (Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
BackgroundMollaei, F., Mersov, A., Woodbury, M., Jobst, C., Cheyne, D., & Nil, L. D. (2021) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2021.104921 · Cited by 20
Auditory and somatosensory feedback mechanisms of laryngeal and articulatory speech motor control
Weerathunge, H. R., Voon, T., Tardif, M., Cilento, D., & Stepp, C. E. (2022) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-022-06395-7 · Cited by 22
“These corrective commands are also integrated into subsequent productions for persistent errors through feedforward control mechanisms (Tourville and Guenther 2011).”
BackgroundMethodLi, T., Chang, Y., Zhao, S., Jones, J. A., Chen, X., Gan, C., Wu, X., Dai, G., Li, J., Shen, Y., et al. (2022) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhac447 · Cited by 23
Vuolo, J., & Goffman, L. (2016) · Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics · doi:10.1080/02699206.2016.1261184 · Cited by 20
“Researchers have increasingly acknowledged interactivity across semantic, lexical, phonological and articulatory levels (e.g. Goffman, 2010; Hickok, 2014; Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
BackgroundEtter, N. M., Miller, O. M., & Ballard, K. J. (2017) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2017_ajslp-16-0151 · Cited by 20
Modulation of effective connectivity during vocalization with perturbed auditory feedback
Parkinson, A. L., Korzyukov, O. A., Larson, C. R., Vladimir Litvak, A., & Robin, D. A. (2013) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.05.002 · Cited by 20
Keulen, S., Mariën, P., van Dun, K., Bastiaanse, R., Manto, M. U., & Verhoeven, J. (2017) · The Cerebellum · doi:10.1007/s12311-017-0849-6 · Cited by 20
“, Directions into Velocity of Articulators) [62, 63].”
Treatment for Childhood Apraxia of Speech: Past, Present, and Future
Maas, E. (2024) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2024_jslhr-23-00233 · Cited by 30
Asymmetry of Auditory-Motor Speech Processing is Determined by Language Experience
Tang, D.-L., Möttönen, R., Asaridou, S. S., & Watkins, K. E. (2020) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1977-20.2020 · Cited by 21
“According to theory, during speech production, an efference copy is sent from the motor cortex to the auditory cortex to encode the expected auditory consequences of upcoming movements, while corrective commands are also sent from auditory cortex to motor cortex that drive compensatory speech movement (36,37).”
BackgroundDai, G., Wang, M., Li, Y., Guo, Z., Jones, J. A., Li, T., Chang, Y., Wang, E. Q., Chen, L., Liu, P., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2022.948696 · Cited by 20
“In the DIVA model, the SMA is hypothesized to be a central component of the feedforward control system controlling the initiation of speech motor commands (Tourville and Guenther, 2011).”
MethodResultNeurocomputational modeling of speech motor development
Meier, A. M., & Guenther, F. H. (2023) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000923000260 · Cited by 20
“…Velocities of Articulators (DIVA) model is an artificial neural network that provides a quantitative account of the computations underlying speech motor control (Guenther, 1995; Tourville & Guenther, 2011; E. Golfinopoulos, Tourville, & Guenther, 2010; see Guenther, 2016 for a detailed treatment).”
BackgroundSelf-citationMechanisms of sensorimotor adaptation in a hierarchical state feedback control model of speech
Kim, K. S., Gaines, J. L., Parrell, B., Ramanarayanan, V., Nagarajan, S. S., & Houde, J. F. (2023) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011244 · Cited by 23
“In DIVA, auditory targets are defined as time-varying regions, which allow for articulatory variability within these regions [29].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEcologizing Dimensionality: Prospects for a Modular Theory of Speech Production
Gick, B. (2016) · Ecological Psychology · doi:10.1080/10407413.2016.1195195 · Cited by 18
“…control is crucial for speech, as any viable model of speech motor control must describe the mechanisms by which speech movements may be achieved without immediate access to the feedback information that results from those movements (see, e.g., Perkell, 2012; Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
BackgroundChanges in Resting-State Connectivity following Melody-Based Therapy in a Patient with Aphasia
Bitan, T., Simić, T., Saverino, C., Jones, C., Glazer, J., Colella, B., Wiseman‐Hakes, C., Green, R., & Rochon, E. A. (2018) · Neural Plasticity · doi:10.1155/2018/6214095 · Cited by 18
“Within the speech motor control system, SMA plays a critical role in controlling the initiation of speech motor commands [74, 75] and the insula is implicated in articulatory coordination and control [76, 77].”
BackgroundTang, D.-L., McDaniel, A., & Watkins, K. E. (2021) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2021.09.008 · Cited by 18
An informal logic of feedback-based temporal control
Tilsen, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.851991 · Cited by 18
“Moreover, internal feedback systems are incorporated in a variety of speech production models (Tourville and Guenther, 2011; Hickok, 2012; Guenther and Hickok, 2016).”
BackgroundIndividual differences in attentional control predict working memory capacity in adults who stutter
Tichenor, S. E., Wray, A. H., Ravizza, S. M., & Yaruss, J. S. (2022) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106273 · Cited by 19
Fundamental or forgotten? Is Pierre Paul Broca still relevant in modern neuroscience?
Friedrich, P., Anderson, C., Schmitz, J., Schlüter, C., Lor, S., Stacho, M., Ströckens, F., Grimshaw, G. M., & Ocklenburg, S. (2018) · Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1080/1357650x.2018.1489827 · Cited by 18
“Although details vary according to specific models, current frameworks of language processing thus emphasize that speech is dependent on the dynamic interaction of several brain regions (Friederici, 2011; Hickok & Poeppel, 2007; Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
BackgroundNiziolek, C. A., & Kiran, S. (2018) · International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1080/17549507.2018.1498920 · Cited by 18
“…in which learned speech movements are driven by top-down motor commands, or at the level of feedback control, in which sensory feedback such as the sound of one’s own voice leads speakers to monitor and update their motor commands online while speaking (Perkell, 2012; Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
BackgroundDavis, M., & Redford, M. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02121 · Cited by 19
“Most adult-focused models of speech production assume that these goals are perceptual or auditory in nature and linked in some manner to a limited set of discrete phonological representations, for example, to phonemes or distinctive features (e.g., Houde and Nagarajan, 2011; Tourville and Guenther, 2011; Hickok, 2012).”
BackgroundHeyne, M., Derrick, D., & Al‐Tamimi, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02597 · Cited by 18
Vocal Imitation in Sensorimotor Learning Models: A Comparative Review
Pagliarini, S., Leblois, A., & Hinaut, X. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems · doi:10.1109/tcds.2020.3041179 · Cited by 20
“…Moulin-Frier and Oudeyer [56] and Moulin-Frier et al. [63], Howard and Messum [49]; 4) directions into velocities of articu-lators (DIVAs) [79], [80] has been used by Bailly [41], Moulin-Frier et al. [10], Forestier et al. [81] and Acevedo-Valle et al. [61]; and 5) VTCalcs software proposed by…”
MethodRong, P. (2021) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2021_jslhr-20-00743 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Tourville, J. A., & Guenther, F. H.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Guenther, Frank H.
- Venue
- Language and Cognitive Processes
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 952-981
- ISSN
- 0169-0965 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0732
- PMC
- PMC3650855
- OpenAlex
- W2011934537
- Cited by
- 748
- References
- 178
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Language and Cognitive Processes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC002852)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Keywords
- DIVA model, speech production, speech development, ventral premotor cortex, right lateralization, feedback control, brain regions, computational model, communication disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
