Cited by 30Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesSport Psychology and PerformanceSports Dynamics and Biomechanics

Brain networks governing the golf swing in professional golfers

Kim, Jin Hyun, Han, Joung Kyue, Kim, Bung-Nyun, Han, Doug Hyun·2015·Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract

Golf, as with most complex motor skills, requires multiple different brain functions, including attention, motor planning, coordination, calculation of timing, and emotional control. In this study we assessed the correlation between swing components and brain connectivity from the cerebellum to the cerebrum. Ten female golf players and 10 age-matched female controls were recruited. In order to determine swing consistency among participants, the standard deviation (SD) of the mean swing speed time and the SD of the mean swing angle were assessed over 30 swings. Functional brain connectivity was assessed by resting state functional MRI. Pro-golfers showed greater positive left cerebellum connectivity to the occipital lobe, temporal lobe, parietal lobe and both frontal lobes compared to controls. The SD of play scores was positively correlated with the SD of the impact angle. Constant swing speed and back swing angle in professional golfers were associated with functional connectivity (FC) between the cerebellum and parietal and frontal lobes. In addition, the constant impact angle in professional golfers was associated with improved golf scores and additional FC of the thalamus.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02640414.2015.1022570

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, J. H., Han, J. K., Kim, B.-N., & Han, D. H.
Affiliations
  • Chung-Ang University Hospital (KR)
  • Seoul National University Hospital (KR)
Corresponding author
Han, Doug Hyun
Venue
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2015-03-12
Volume
33
Issue
19
Pages
1980-1987
ISSN
  • 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-447X
OpenAlex
W2051550093
Cited by
30
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
Keywords
golf swing, professional golfers, cerebellum, brain functional connectivity, resting-state fMRI, cerebellar-cortical connectivity, impact angle, swing speed, thalamus, motor skills, female golfers
MeSH terms
Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Brain, Cerebellum, Female, Frontal Lobe, Golf, Humans, Motor Skills, Movement, Occipital Lobe, Parietal Lobe, Temporal Lobe, Thalamus, Cerebrum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review