Cited by 26Menstrual Health and DisordersMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumEndometriosis Research and Treatment

Evaluating the relative efficacy of a self-help and minimal psycho-educational intervention for moderate premenstrual distress conducted from a critical realist standpoint

Ussher, Jane M., Perz, Janette·2006·Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology

Abstract

Previous research suggests that mild to moderate premenstrual symptoms (PMS) can be ameliorated by self‐help psycho‐educational support. However, it is unknown as to whether face‐to‐face contact with a clinician, through a minimal psycho‐educational intervention, can significantly increase the benefits of PMS self‐help packages, or whether self‐help packages can be effective on their own. In this pilot study, 32 women were randomized to one of two groups, self‐help pack alone, or self‐help pack with minimal psycho‐educational intervention. Twenty women completed the pre‐ and post‐intervention measures (11 self‐help group; nine psycho‐education group). Fourteen women, seven in each group, were randomly selected for pre‐ and post‐interviews. Both groups reported reduced anxiety and reduced life interference from PMS post‐intervention. The minimal intervention group reported a broader range of improvements, including significant reductions in depression and the extent to which PMS caused distress, and significant improvements in ability to cope with symptoms. Premenstrual change was still present post‐intervention, however, women reported reductions in distress, improvements in coping, and repositioning of PMS as something that could be ameliorated through changes in behaviour or thought patterns. This confirms the significant role played by the construction, attribution and appraisal of premenstrual changes on the development and course of premenstrual distress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02646830600974147

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ussher, J. M., & Perz, J.
Affiliations
Western Sydney University (AU)
Corresponding author
Ussher, Jane M.
Venue
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology
Published
2006-11
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
347-362
ISSN
  • 0264-6838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-672X
OpenAlex
W2052497742
Cited by
26
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Keywords
premenstrual distress, premenstrual syndrome, self-help intervention, psychoeducational intervention, face-to-face psychotherapy, critical realism, coping, depression, anxiety, life interference, women's health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review