Cited by 41Menstrual Health and DisordersGender and Feminist StudiesMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Women's experience of premenstrual syndrome: a case of silencing the self

Perz, Janette, Ussher, Jane M.·2006·Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between self‐silencing and premenstrual distress in women who position themselves as PMS sufferers. A mixed method design, consisting of multiple regression analyses of 257 questionnaires, and qualitative analysis of two contrasting case studies, was utilized. Externalized self‐perception, silencing the self, and divided self subscales of the Silencing the Self Scale (STSS) were significantly related to premenstrual distress, and externalized self‐perception, divided self and care as self‐sacrifice subscales significantly related to premenstrual coping. In conjunction with the case study accounts of self‐silencing, this confirms previous research findings that women with PMS use hegemonic constructions of femininity against which to judge themselves, and repress feelings and behaviours which deviate from these ideals, or attribute them to the reproductive body. Accounts of the inter‐subjective negotiation of PMS and of reactions to premenstrual distress reinforced previous suggestions that partners play a crucial role in women's experience of premenstrual change. Levels of anxiety were significantly higher than non‐clinical population norms. However, levels of depression were lower than both population norms and previous reports of depression in women with similar STSS scores. This is interpreted as women with PMS directing their anger outwards once a month, rather than internalizing it and becoming depressed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02646830600973883

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perz, J., & Ussher, J. M.
Affiliations
Western Sydney University (AU)
Corresponding author
Perz, Janette
Venue
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology
Published
2006-11
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
289-303
ISSN
  • 0264-6838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-672X
OpenAlex
W2002956261
Cited by
41
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
premenstrual syndrome, premenstrual distress, self-silencing, divided self, self-sacrifice, hegemonic femininity, women's experiences, partner reactions, anxiety, depression, anger, reproductive body

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review