The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of perceived freewill in crises of human-AI interaction: the mediating role of ethical responsibility of AI
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Ahn et al. (2024) found that perceived free will in AI mediates attributions of ethical responsibility to AI versus developers, with accommodative responses proving more effective when high free will is perceived.”
From Artificial Intelligence in Crisis Communication: Investigating Source Effects and Matched Crisis Responses on Stakeholder Perceptions (2026) · cites this paper as Ahn et al. 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person
Frankfurt, H. G. (1971) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2024717 · Cited by 4,663
On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.4.864 · Cited by 4,069 · cited 4×
“…coping mechanism to alleviate this inconvenience, individuals frequently employ the strategy of anthropomorphism, wherein they attribute human-like characteristics to and interpret non-human entities as human beings (Epley, Waytz, and Cacioppo 2007; MacInnis and Folkes 2017; Nowak and Biocca 2003).”
BackgroundInfluentialAI-based chatbots in customer service and their effects on user compliance
Adam, M., Wessel, M., & Benlian, A. (2021) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-020-00414-7 · Cited by 1,195
Smiling AI agents: How anthropomorphism and broad smiles increase charitable giving
Baek, T. H., Bakpayev, M., Yoon, S., & Kim, S. (2022) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2021.2011654 · Cited by 125
Belief in free will affects causal attributions when judging others’ behavior
Genschow, O., Rigoni, D., & Brass, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1701916114 · Cited by 82
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- 10.1080/02650487.2021.1982529 · DOI
- 10.2307/3512389 · DOI
- 10.1080/10510979509368441 · doi:10.1080/10510979509368441
- Buolamwini J. and T. Gebru. 2018. (January). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Conference on fairness accountability and transparency 77–91. PMLR.
- 10.1525/collabra.305 · DOI
- 10.1108/JPBM-05-2020-2907 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/154193120404801110 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.05.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1207/s1532754xjprr1102_02 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/089331802237233 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00374-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4324/9780429500367 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-34103-8_20 · DOI · Paper page
- Fischer, J.M. 1994. The metaphysics of free will. (Vol. 1). Oxford: Blackwell.
- 10.1525/eth.1990.18.2.02a00040 · DOI
- 10.2307/2023833 · DOI · Paper page
- Hayes, A.F. 2017. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Publications.
- 10.2752/089279307780216650 · DOI
- 10.1093/jcr/ucv017 · DOI
- Kane, R. 2005. A contemporary introduction to free will. New York: Oxford University Press.
- 10.1093/jcr/ucw016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/02650487.2021.1963098 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0002597 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4018/978-1-61520-901-9.ch001 · DOI
- 10.1108/EJM-05-2014-0291 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jcps.2016.12.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0146167292185006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1056808.1056988 · DOI
- 10.2501/JAR-51-3-499-510 · DOI
- 10.1162/105474603322761289 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1467-9566.ep10493131 · DOI
- Reider, L. 1998. Toward a new test for the insanity defense: Incorporating the discoveries of neuroscience into moral and legal theories. UCLA L. Rev 46: 289.
- 10.1145/1514095.1514158 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.03.004 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0092976 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/IHTC.2017.8058187 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02045.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1108/09590550910948556 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11199-006-9078-z · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106721 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rstb.2004.1548 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.12.025 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10551-012-1512-2 · DOI
Cited by
Greilich, A., Bremser, K., & Wüst, K. (2025) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.70108 · Cited by 47
AI apology: a critical review of apology in AI systems
Harland, H., Dazeley, R., Senaratne, H., Vamplew, P., Cruz, F., & Nakisa, B. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11305-8 · Cited by 19
Schneider, E., Kyriakopoulos, V., Seo, Y., Hong, N., Lee, M., & Lim, J. S. (2026) · Corporate Reputation Review · doi:10.1057/s41299-026-00254-9 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahn, J., Kim, J., & Sung, Y.
- Venue
- International Journal of Advertising
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2024-01-02
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 847-873
- ISSN
- 0265-0487
- 1759-3948
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea
- National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2021S1A5B5A16075775)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
