CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,051

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for the food sector

Chaudhry, Qasim, Scotter, Michael, Blackburn, James, Ross, Bryony, Boxall, Alistair, Castle, Laurence, Aitken, Robert, Watkins, Richard·2008·Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A
DOI 10.1080/02652030701744538
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02652030701744538

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Akbari Z, 2006, Conference organised by Institute of Nanotechnology
  2. 10.1016/S0927-796X(00)00012-7 · DOI
  3. Ashwood P, 1999, Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) adsorbed into inorganic dietary particles hyperstimulates intestinal mononuclear cells
  4. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.10.024 · DOI
  5. FDA BASF, acknowledges GRAS notification for BASF synthetic lycopene: Nutritional supplement used in tablets or to fortify food and beverages
  6. Berne RM, 2000, Principles of Physiology
  7. Food Production Daily
  8. Chaudhry Q, 2007, Central Science Laboratory
  9. Chaudhry Q, 2005, A scoping study into the manufacture use of nanomaterials in the UK
  10. Chen H, 2006, Food Technology, 603, 30
  11. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.12.021 · DOI
  12. Crisalle L, 2007, Types of Protein Differences in Quality
  13. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.08.013 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1023/A:1016085108889 · DOI
  15. 10.1136/oem.2004.013243 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 2006, A review of potential implications of nanotechnologies for regulations risk assessment in relation to food
  17. 2003, Size Matters! ETC Group: New information provides more evidence for mandatory moratorium on synthetic nanoparticles
  18. 2004, Down on the farm: the impact of nano-scale technologies on food agriculture
  19. 10.1053/gast.2002.36554 · DOI
  20. 2007, Food Chemical News, 2, 13
  21. 2004, Food Marketing Institute
  22. Nanotech discovery promises safer food packaging
  23. 10.1289/ehp.8006 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.tifs.2005.12.009 · DOI
  25. 2004, Study: nanotechnology in food and food processing industry worldwide, 2003–2006–2010–2015
  26. 10.1186/1477-3155-2-12 · DOI
  27. 2006, Institute of Food Science Technology Trust Fund
  28. Institute of Food Science Technology “FSA Draft Report on a Regulatory Review of the Use of Nanotechnologies in Relation to Food”
  29. Joseph T, 2006, Nanotechnology in Agriculture Food: A Nanoforum report published in April 2006
  30. 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.05.070 · DOI
  31. 10.1023/A:1011563521316 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.09.012 · DOI
  33. 10.1289/ehp.6000 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Limpens J, 2006, Journal of Nutrition, 136, 1287, 10.1093/jn/136.5.1287 · DOI
  35. 10.1097/00042737-200503000-00019 · DOI
  36. 10.1097/00042737-200102000-00003 · DOI
  37. 10.1079/PNS2001134 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/444267a · DOI
  39. 10.1002/pi.1287 · DOI
  40. 10.1289/ehp.7021 · DOI
  41. 10.1023/A:1022308705231 · DOI
  42. 10.1002/1439-2054(20020801)287:8<553::AID-MAME553>3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI
  43. 10.1006/jaut.1999.0342 · DOI
  44. 10.1136/gut.39.2.340 · DOI
  45. 10.1021/ma0210731 · DOI
  46. Roco, MC and Bainbridge, WS. 2001. Societal Implications of Nanoscience Nanotechnology , 3–4. Boston: Kluwer Academic. · DOI
  47. 2004, Nanoscience Nanotechnologies: opportunities uncertainties
  48. 10.1073/pnas.0608611104 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.11.023 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/S0168-3659(96)01600-8 · DOI
  51. 2006, Quietly nanotechnology joins the food chain, 5
  52. 10.1016/S0142-9418(02)00126-5 · DOI
  53. 10.1002/app.12358 · DOI
  54. 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00195.x · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.02.069 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,051

Metadata

Authors
Chaudhry, Q., Scotter, M., Blackburn, J., Ross, B., Boxall, A., Castle, L., Aitken, R., & Watkins, R.
Venue
Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2008-03
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
241-258
ISSN
  • 1944-0049
  • 1944-0057
DOI
10.1080/02652030701744538
Cited by
1,051
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review