Cited by 56Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismLanguage Development and Disorders

Word retrieval in connected speech in Alzheimer’s disease: A review with meta-analyses

Kavé, Gitit, Goral, Mira·2018·Aphasiology

Abstract

Background: Language assessment in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) demonstrates deficits in single-word production, but rarely includes connected speech.Aims: If Alzheimer’s disease leads to deficits in lexical retrieval, we should find reduced word output in connected speech, limited lexical diversity, an increase in retrieval errors, and an association between scores on tests of single-word production and measures of word retrieval in context. The purpose of this review was to investigate these hypotheses across studies of connected speech in AD.Main Contribution: A search of Medline and PsychNET identified 51 articles (published in 1985–2016) that reported data from 1,114 individuals with AD and 1,280 cognitively healthy individuals. A meta-analysis showed a significant but small reduction in word output in AD. No consistent decrease in the proportion of unique words was documented, but there was indication that individuals with AD produce more frequent words than do controls. An analysis of errors documented a moderate effect size, showing that individuals with AD commit more retrieval errors of all types. A relatively strong association was found between picture-naming scores and measures of word retrieval in connected speech.Conclusions: The review shows that individuals with AD experience significant lexical retrieval difficulties in connected speech.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02687038.2017.1338663

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Systematic reviews show that speech and language studies across neurodegenerative diseases span fewer than 20 languages, most tested in only a handful of papers.

    “Also, as shown by systematic reviews, speech and language studies across neurodegenerative diseases span fewer than 20 languages, most of them tested in only a handful of papers. 4,5,47,81-83”
  • English is predominant in Alzheimer's disease research, accounting for 69% of word retrieval studies and over 40% of ASLA reports.

    “This language is also predominant in Alzheimer's disease research, accounting for 69% of word retrieval studies 83 and over 40% of ASLA reports 47”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kavé, G., & Goral, M.
Affiliations
  • Open University of Israel (IL)
  • Lehman College (US)
Corresponding author
Kavé, Gitit
Venue
Aphasiology
Published
2017-06-13
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
4-26
ISSN
  • 0268-7038 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5041
OpenAlex
W2626281207
Cited by
56
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Aphasiology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, word retrieval, connected speech, lexical diversity, retrieval errors, picture naming, single word production, language assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review