The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals
Abstract
The uniquely human emotion of disgust is intimately connected to morality in many, perhaps all, cultures (Rozin, Lowery, Imada, & Haidt, 1999b). We report two studies suggesting that a predisposition to feel disgust (“disgust sensitivity”) is associated with more conservative political attitudes, especially for issues related to the moral dimension of purity. In the first study, we document a positive correlation between disgust sensitivity and self-reported conservatism in a broad sample of US adults. In Study 2 we show that while disgust sensitivity is associated with more conservative attitudes on a range of political issues, this relationship is strongest for purity-related issues—specifically, abortion and gay marriage.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Results are mixed on this, actually; Inbar et al. (2009) found that conservatives have greater disgust.”
From Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity (2012) · cites this paper as Inbar et al. (2009)
In the citing paper
“empirical evidence reveals that the subjective perception of infection risk causes individuals to be more conformist, to prefer conformity and obedience in others, to respond more negatively toward others who fail to conform, and to endorse more conservative socio-political attitudes [10], [11], [12], [13], [14].”
From Pathogens and Politics: Further Evidence That Parasite Prevalence Predicts Authoritarianism (2013) · cites this paper as [11]
Citations
Cites
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904 · cited 2×
“Sensation Seeking and openness to experience have been linked to a wide variety of conservative attitudes, including a general reluctance to change the established order as well as acceptance of social or economic inequality between groups (see Jost et al., 2003, for a review).”
BackgroundWhen Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize
Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z · Cited by 2,385
Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?
Haidt, J., Koller, S. H., & Dias, M. G. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.613 · Cited by 1,747
Haidt, J., McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (1994) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(94)90212-7 · Cited by 1,632
Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S., & Haidt, J. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.574 · Cited by 1,566
Disgust as Embodied Moral Judgment
Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L., & Jordan, A. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167208317771 · Cited by 1,409
Lewis, M. D., Haviland-Jones, J. M., & Barrett, L. F. (2000) · Cited by 1,304
Miller, W. I. (1997) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv26071fj · Cited by 1,267
Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think
Lakoff, G. P. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,265
Lakoff, G. P. (2002) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226471006.001.0001 · Cited by 1,006
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Bloom P., 2004, The Guardian, UK
- Costa P. T., 1985, The NEO Personality Inventory manual
- Rozin P., 2000, Handbook of emotions, 637
- Schnall S., Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Zuckerman M., 1979, Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimum level of arousal
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities
Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600 · Cited by 2,125
Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S. P., Motyl, M. S., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4 · Cited by 1,966
The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes
Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612449177 · Cited by 928
Disgust: evolved function and structure
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., Kurzban, R., & DeScioli, P. (2013) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0030778 · Cited by 810
Disgust as an adaptive system for disease avoidance behaviour
Curtis, V., de Barra, M., & Aunger, R. (2011) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0117 · Cited by 746
Metadata
- Authors
- Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Inbar, Yoel
- Venue
- Cognition & Emotion
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 714-725
- ISSN
- 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0600
- OpenAlex
- W2142553311
- Cited by
- 574
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 35
- FWCI
- 9.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Keywords
- disgust sensitivity, political conservatism, moral emotions, purity, moral dimensions, abortion, same-sex marriage, political attitudes, liberals and conservatives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review