Cited by 12Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMental Health via WritingMental Health Research Topics

Social media misuse explained by emotion dysregulation and self-concept: an ecological momentary assessment approach

Rogier, Guyonne, Muzi, Stefania, Pace, Cecilia Serena·2024·Cognition and Emotion

Abstract

Studies suggested that emotion dysregulation and identity processes are involved in social media (SM) misuse, even if their proximal role has not been investigated. Previous studies rarely discriminated between specific activities or between types of SM. We recruited 50 young adults and implemented a momentary ecological assessment measurement. Four times by day, during seven days, we measured SM use, frequency of several activities on SM, emotion dysregulation, distress and clarity of self-concept. Daily time spent on Facebook, Instagram and TikTok were retrieved from devices. Intradaily changes in emotion dysregulation and clarity of self-concept predict changes in SM addiction symptoms and frequency of use according to the type of activity. Daily changes in time spent on SM were not predicted by emotion dysregulation, distress and self-concept clarity. Findings suggest that emotion dysregulation and poor self-concept clarity are proximal risk factors for SM misuse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699931.2024.2363413

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Instagram addiction behaviors are particularly prevalent among adolescents and young adults.

    “These behaviors are particularly prevalent among adolescents and young adults, who are still navigating their identity and social relationships (Albery et al. 2025;Rogier et al. 2024).”

    From The Scrolling Paradox: Analyzing Instagram Addiction Patterns in The Digital Age (2025) · cites this paper as Rogier et al. 2024

  • Instagram's feedback mechanisms can foster narcissistic tendencies, which are associated with increased emotional instability and greater susceptibility to mood disorders.

    “The platform's feedback mechanisms can foster narcissistic tendencies, which are associated with increased emotional instability and greater susceptibility to mood disorders (Rogier et al. 2024).”

    From The Scrolling Paradox: Analyzing Instagram Addiction Patterns in The Digital Age (2025) · cites this paper as Rogier et al. 2024

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rogier, G., Muzi, S., & Pace, C. S.
Affiliations
University of Genoa (IT)
Corresponding author
Rogier, Guyonne
Venue
Cognition and Emotion
Published
2024-06-11
Volume
38
Issue
8
Pages
1261-1270
ISSN
  • 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0600
OpenAlex
W4399594235
Cited by
12
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1
FWCI
8.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
social media misuse, emotional dysregulation, self-concept clarity, social media addiction, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, distress, young adults, proximal risk factors, ecological momentary assessment
MeSH terms
Ecological Momentary Assessment, Emotional Regulation, Internet Addiction Disorder, Adolescent, Adult, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Self Concept, Young Adult, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review