Cited by 20Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologySexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Time Spent on Mobile Apps Matters: A Latent Class Analysis of Patterns of Smartphone Use among Adolescents

Open access
Fortunato, Lucia, Lo Coco, Gianluca, Teti, Arianna, Bonfanti, Rubinia Celeste, Salerno, Laura·2023·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

The aims of the present study are: (1) to determine classes of adolescents with homogeneous patterns of smartphone or social media use; and (2) to examine the level of distress across the empirically derived profiles. Three hundred and forty adolescents (Mage = 15.61, SD = 1.19; 38.2% females) participated in a cross-sectional survey. Participants provided objective trace data on time spent on smartphones and applications, as well as self-reported social media addiction, social media use intensity, online social comparison, emotion dysregulation, and psychological distress. Latent class analysis (LCA) with total smartphone use categorized participants into three classes. Participants in Class 3 (19%) showed a more impaired functioning profile, with a tendency towards social media addiction and greater levels of distress. LCAs with the amount of time devoted to specific applications are more heterogeneous, and results showed that heavy use of social media apps was not consistently connected to the most impaired psychosocial profiles. Although the amount of mobile screen time can be a characteristic of problematic users, the link between social media usage and an adolescent’s psychological characteristics is mixed. More research is needed to explore the interplay between mobile screen time and social media usage among adolescents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph20156439

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ten studies differentiated the population between active and passive users, while only one conducted a content analysis of posts, hashtags, or videos.

    “Given that, ten studies differentiated the population between active and passive users [42, 67, 70, 72, 74–79], while only one conducted a content analysis of the posts, hashtags, or videos [78].”

    From Scrolling through adolescence: a systematic review of the impact of TikTok on adolescent mental health (2025) · cites this paper as [67]

    The Methods (sections 2.2–2.3; page unavailable) describe measuring adolescents’ app use and using latent class analysis to group participants by usage patterns. The paper distinguishes usage levels, not active from passive users, and describes no content analysis of posts, hashtags, or videos. It therefore does not match the study attributed to this citation. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Eleven studies used self-developed questionnaires for outcome evaluation, of which only six paired it with standardized measures.

    “Eleven studies used self-developed questionnaires for outcome evaluation [42, 67–72, 74, 80–82], of which only six paired it with standardized measures [67–69, 71, 72, 80, 81].”

    From Scrolling through adolescence: a systematic review of the impact of TikTok on adolescent mental health (2025) · cites this paper as [67]

    Section 2.2 (page unavailable) describes questionnaire items on smartphone use alongside established scales, including the YP-CORE measure of psychological distress. The paper therefore supports using study-specific questions together with standardized measures, but it does not establish that the study-specific questions were used for outcome evaluation; §2.3 identifies CORE-YP as the distress outcome measure. The counts of eleven and six are the citing authors’ synthesis, not findings this individual study could establish. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Other studies showed that the variable "time" is not sufficiently sensitive to predict PTU risk as it does not account for individual factors involved in dysfunctional TikTok usage patterns.

    “Conversely, other studies showed that the variable “time” is not sufficiently sensitive to predict PTU risk as it does not account for individual factors (e.g., emotion regulation abilities) involved in dysfunctional TikTok usage patterns [67].”

    From Scrolling through adolescence: a systematic review of the impact of TikTok on adolescent mental health (2025) · cites this paper as [67]

    The TikTok Results (§3.2) identify groups with similar time spent on TikTok but different emotion-dysregulation and social-media-addiction scores, supporting the point that time alone misses relevant individual differences. The Methods (§2.2) measured general social media addiction, not problematic TikTok use specifically, and the study did not test prediction of PTU risk. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Four of the included studies assessed wellbeing indicators, like creativity, innovation, life satisfaction, and health habits, while sixteen assessed mental disorder indicators such as depression, anxiety, stress or body image issues.

    “Four of the studies [68, 75, 79, 80] assessed wellbeing indicators, like creativity, innovation, life satisfaction, and health habits, while sixteen assessed mental disorder indicators such as depression, anxiety, stress or body image issues [42, 67, 68, 70–73, 76–79, 81–85].”
  • Among included studies, only four reported data about total daily screen time, and four detailed the amount of time spent on TikTok.

    “Among the included studies, only four reported data about total daily screen time [67–70], and four detailed the amount the time spent on TikTok [42, 67, 71, 72].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [40]Eisenberg N. Fabes R.A. Emotion, regulation, and the development of social competence Emotion and Social Behavior Sage Publications, Inc. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA 1992

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fortunato, L., Lo Coco, G., Teti, A., Bonfanti, R. C., & Salerno, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Palermo (IT)
  • Department of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Edificio 15, 90128 Palermo, Italy
Corresponding author
Salerno, Laura
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-07-25
Volume
20
Issue
15
Pages
6439
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385278269
Cited by
20
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
8.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
adolescent smartphone use, social media use, social media addiction, psychological distress, emotional dysregulation, problematic media use, user profiles
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Latent Class Analysis, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Time Factors, Behavior, Addictive, Social Media, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review