The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Theory of Emotion, and its Application to Understanding the Neural Basis of Emotion
Abstract
It is shown that emotions can usefully be considered as states produced by reinforcing stimuli. The ways in which a wide variety of emotions can be produced, and the functions of emotion, are considered. There is evidence that the amygdala is involved in the formation of stimulus-reinforcement associations, and the orbitofrontal cortex with correcting behavioural responses when these are no longer appropriate because previous reinforcement contingencies change. This evidence comes from the effects of damage to these structures, and from recording the activity of single neurons in these structures in the monkey during the formation and disconnection of stimulus-reinforcement associations. In so far as emotions can be defined as states produced by reinforcing stimuli, then the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex are seen to be of great importance for emotions, in that they are involved respectively in the elicitation of learned emotional responses, and in the correction or adjustment of these emotional responses as the reinforcing value of environmental stimuli alters. One of the theses advanced is that the changes in emotional behaviour produced by damage to the brain can be analysed and understood by considering how different parts of it function in reinforcement and in the formation and disconnection of stimulus-reinforcement connections. Another thesis is that there is a population of neurons in the amygdala and parts of the temporal lobe visual cortex specialised to respond to faces, and that these neurons may be involved in social and emotional resposes to faces. Some of the outputs of the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex are directed to the hypothalamus, which not only provides one route for these reinforcing environmental events to produce autonomic responses, but also is implicated in the utilisation of such stimuli in motivational responses, such as feeding and drinking, and in emotional behaviour. Other outputs of the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex which may enable them to influence behaviour are directed to the striatum, and also back towards some of the cortical regions from which they receive inputs. It is suggested that these latter projections are important in the effects which mood states have on cognitive processing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state.
Schachter, S., & Singer, J. (1962) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0046234 · Cited by 6,223
Blaney, P. H. (1986) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.99.2.229 · Cited by 1,773
Preliminary analysis of functions of the temporal lobes in monkeys
KLÜVER, H. (1939) · Archives of Neurology And Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archneurpsyc.1939.02270240017001 · Cited by 1,696 · cited 1×
“These behavioural changes comprise much of the Kluver-Bucy syndrome which is produced in monkeys by bilateral anterior temporal lobectomy (Kluver & Bucy, 1939).”
BackgroundInsula of the old world monkey. III: Efferent cortical output and comments on function
Mesulam, M. ‐., & Mufson, E. J. (1982) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902120104 · Cited by 1,013
The orbitofrontal cortex: Neuronal activity in the behaving monkey
Thorpe, S. J., Rolls, E. T., & Maddison, S. (1983) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00235545 · Cited by 836
Self-citationRolls, E. T., Sienkiewicz, Z. J., & Yaxley, S. (1989) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.1989.tb00774.x · Cited by 466
Self-citationButter, C. M. (1969) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/0031-9384(69)90075-4 · Cited by 395
Rolls, E. T., Sanghera, M. K., & Roper-Hall, A. (1979) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(79)90010-6 · Cited by 312
Self-citationNeurophysiological analysis of brain-stimulation reward in the monkey
Rolls, E. T., Burton, M. J., & Mora, F. (1980) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(80)91216-0 · Cited by 193
Self-citation
Cited by
Mayberg, H. S., Liotti, M., Brannan, S. K., McGinnis, S., Mahurin, R. K., Jerabek, P. A., Silva, J. A., Tekell, J. L., Martin, C. C., Lancaster, J. L., et al. (1999) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.156.5.675 · Cited by 2,416
A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition.
Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, A. U. (1999) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.106.3.529 · Cited by 2,270
KRINGELBACH, M. (2004) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.03.006 · Cited by 1,977
Dalgleish, T. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1432 · Cited by 1,849
The Orbitofrontal Cortex and Reward
Rolls, E. T. (2000) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/10.3.284 · Cited by 1,595
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rolls, E. T.
- Venue
- Cognition & Emotion
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1990-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 161-190
- ISSN
- 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0600
- OpenAlex
- W2073275342
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 10.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Theory of Emotion, and its Application to Understanding the Neural Basis of Emotion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02699939008410795
- The paper
- Rolls, E. T. (1990). A Theory of Emotion, and its Application to Understanding the Neural Basis of Emotion. Cognition & Emotion. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939008410795
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.